Skip to main content

Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Systems Model of Creativity

Abstract

It is customary to date the renewal of interest in creativity among psychologists to Guillord’s presidential address to the APA more than 30 years ago (Guilford 1950). Ever since that date, an increasing tide of publications on the subject has been appearing in our journals. Many of these books and articles have tried to answer what has been thought to be the most fundamental question: What is creativity? But no one has raised the simple question that should precede attempts at defining, measuring, or enhancing, namely: Where is creativity?

Reproduced with permission from Conception of Giftedness (Eds. R.J. Sternberg and J. E. Davisdon), pages 325−339, New York, USA. Copyright © 1988, Cambridge University Press.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabite, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, J. (1986). Cognitive issues in ihe development of musically gifted children. In: R. J. Stemberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 388–416). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (1985). Developing talent in young children. New York: Bailantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghero, G. (1986). Thyssen-Bornemisza collection. Catalogue raisonne. Milano: Edizioni Electa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, A. (1981). The social basis of scientific discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1965). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In: H. R. Borringer, G. I. Blankston, & R. W. Monk (Eds.), Social change in developing areas (pp. 9–42). Cambridge: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1976). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), The library of living philosophers (pp. 413–463). La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyney, E. P. (1936). The dawn of a new era: 12501453. New York: Harper & Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Attention and the holistic approach to behavior. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness (pp. 335–358). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1979). Art and problem finding. Paper presented at the 87th annual convention of the APA, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1986) Motivation and creativity: Towards a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New ideas in psychology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 47–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1973). The personality of young artists: An empirical and theoretical exploration. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 91–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csiksientmihalyi, M. & Getzels, J. W. (1988). Creativity and problem finding in art. In F. H. Farley, & R. W. Neperud (Eds.) The foundations of aesthetics, art, and art education. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csiksientmihalyi, M., Gelzels, J. W. & Kahn, S. (1984). Talent and achievement: A longitudinal study with artists. Chicago: University of Chicago (Unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihaiyi, M., & Massimini, R. (1985). On the psychological selection of bio-cultural information. New Ideas in Psychology, 3(2), 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish game. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. (1986). Nature’s gambit. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1986). Freud in three frames. Daedalus, 115, 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1968). On the rules, values, and performance of future artists: A conceptual and empirical exploration. Sociological Quarterly, 9, 516–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartt, F. (1979). History of Italian renaissance art. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, A. (1951). The social history of art (Vol. 2). New York: Vinlage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydenreich, L. H. (1974). II primo Rinaseimento. Milano: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermode, P. (1985). Forms of attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.) The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecourt, D. (1977). Proletarian science. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, Z. (1971). The rise and fail of Dr. Lysenko. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1981). The mind’s best work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, A. (1946). The personality of artists. Education and Personality Measure, 6, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. & Shrager, J. (1984). A model of strategic choice. In: C. Sophian (Ed.) Origins of cognitive skills. Hilisdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1985). Psychology of scientific discovery. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual APA Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1978). History and the eminent person. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 269–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallers, J. & Gardner, H. (1986). The crystallizing experience. In: R. Stemberg, & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 306–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity. In: The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics