Skip to main content

Culture, Time, and the Development of Talent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Systems Model of Creativity

Abstract

The literature on giftedness gives the impression that most authors conceive of talent (talent, giftedness and prodigious performance will be used interchangeably) as a stable trait that belongs to a person. Although some writers have warned us not “to view giftedness as an absolute concept—something that exists in and of itself, without relation to anything else” (Renzulli 1980, p. 4), most people consider giftedness as an objective fact, something you either have or don’t have, like green eyes or a mole on the nose.

Reproduced with permission from Conception of Giftedness (Eds. R.J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson), pp. 264–284, New York, USA. Copyright © 1988, Cambridge University Press.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, J. (1982). Growing up prodigies: The midlife crisis. New Directions for Child Development, 17, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Englchart, M. D., Furst, E. D., Hill, W. H., & Graghwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook. I. Cognitive domain. Makay: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, A. (1981). The social basis of scientific discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. R., & Ormrod, J. E. (1982). Acquisition of formal operations by intellectually gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(3), 110–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delisle, J. R., & Renzulli, J. S. (1980). The revolving door identification and programming model: Correlates of creative production. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(2), 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, L., & Sperry, R. W. (1977). Hemisphere localization for cognitive processing of geometry. Neuropsychologia, 15, 107–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. G. (1980). The social and the biological: A necessary unity. Zygon, 15(2), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W. (1964). Creative thinking, problem solving, and instruction. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction. The sixty-third yearbook of the national society of the study of education, Part 1 (pp. 240–267). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Cskiszentmilialyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havighurst, R. J. (1951). Developmental tasks and education. New York: Longhmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form: A theory of art. New York: Seribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J., & Ferguson, T. J. (1983). Gifted adolescents: An analysis of their psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12(1), 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oden, M. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: 40-years follow-up of the Terman gifted group. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 77, 3–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1980). Will the gifted child movement be alive and well in 1990? Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1965). Gifted children in the classroom. New York: MacMillan. (Quoted in Barge, V. S. & Renzulli, J. S. (Eds.). (1975) Psychology and education of the gifted (2nd ed., pp. 48–55). New York: Wiley.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Robinson, R.E. (2014). Culture, Time, and the Development of Talent. In: The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics