Advertisement

The Artistic Personality: A Systems Perspective

Chapter

Abstract

When considering the relationship between personality and a given occupation or vocation, we usually assume the relationship remains invariant over time. One might assume, for instance, that the temperament and traits that distinguished military leaders in the 5th century BCE would be the same traits as those belonging to warriors in the Middle Ages, or in our own times. Yet the changes throughout history in the social and economic status of soldiers, and in the technology of warfare, suggest that the personalities of men (or women) attracted to a military career will be quite different in each period.

Keywords

Artistic Creativity Artistic Style Artistic Process Successful Artist Military Career 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barron, F. (1972). Artists in the making. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, K., & Cattell, H. (1972). Personality characteristics of female psychology, science and art majors. Psychological Reports, 31, 807–813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1973). The personality of young artists: an empirical and theoretical exploration. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 91–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Getzels, J. W., & Kahn, S. P. (1984). Talent and achievement (Report). Chicago: Spencer and MacArthur Foundations.Google Scholar
  6. Cupchik, G. C. (1974). An experimental investigation of perceptual and stylistic dimensions of paintings suggested by art history. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics (pp. 235–257). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Danto, A. (1998). After the end of art: Contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dudek, S. Z., & Marchand, P. (1983). Artistic style and personality in creative painters. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47(2), 139–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman, M. (1993). Finding the muse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fromm, E. (1978). Primary and secondary process in waking and in altered states of consciousness. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 4, 115–128.Google Scholar
  11. Getzels, U. J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Greenberg, C. (1940). Towards a newer Laocoon. Partisan Review, 3, 296–310.Google Scholar
  13. Gruber, H. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: a psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143–169). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Hauser, A. (1951). The social history of art. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  16. Kimmelman, M. (1998). Portraits: talking with artists at the met, the modern, the louvre, and elsewhere. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  17. Kubler, G. (1962). The shape of time. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Loomis, M., & Saltz, E. (1984). Cognitive styles as predictors of artistic styles. Journal of Personality, 52(1), 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lucie-Smith, E. (1999). Lives of the great twentieth century artists. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  20. Ludwig, A. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyons, L., & Storr, R. (1987). Chuck close. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  22. Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse. New York: Basic Boob.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, H. (1972). The de-definition of art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Seuphor, M. (1961). Abstract painting: 50 years of accomplishment, from Kandinsky to the present (Chevalier H, Trans.). New York: Harry Abrams.Google Scholar
  25. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: what do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simonton, D. K. (1990). Political pathology and societal creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 3(2), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simpson, C. R. (1981). SoHo: the artist in the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Solomon, D. (1987). Jackson Pollock: A biography. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  29. Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. J Psychol, 36, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stein, M. I. (1963). A transactional approach to creativity. In C. W. Taylor &. F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity (pp. 217–227). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Storr, A. (1988). Solitude: A return to the self. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Vasari, G. (1959). Lives of the artists, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, (Original work published 1550).Google Scholar
  33. Vollard, A. (1986). Degas, an intimate portrait. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  34. Walker, A. M., Koestner, R., & Hum, A. (1995). Personality correlates of depressive style in autobiographies of creative achievers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(2), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolrffin, H. (1929). Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art (7th rev ed.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations