Advertisement

Subtle Persuasions: The Memory of Bodily Experience as a Rhetorical Device in Francis Bacon’s Parliamentary Speeches

  • Daniel DerrinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind book series (SHPM, volume 15)

Abstract

Francis Bacon’s parliamentary speeches have barely been studied in comparison with his other works. Their rhetorical brilliance, and what that reveals of their creator’s understanding of human psychology, offers an important angle on our wider conceptions of Bacon’s abilities as a communicator and propagator of ideas. I propose to look in particular at the rhetorical uses to which Bacon puts remembered bodily experience in his speeches. How does he evoke memories of bodily experiences to be mentally reconstructed by his audiences? How can we link the purposive context of a speech with the rhetorical skills Bacon deploys on that occasion? In attempting to answer these questions I pursue a rhetorical angle on conjunctions of mind and body in Bacon’s England.

Keywords

Francis Bacon Rhetoric Memory Speeches Parliament 

References

  1. Aquinas, T. (1964–1981). Summa Theologiæ: Latin text and English translation, Introductions, Notes, Appendices, and Glossaries. Cambridge: Blackfriars.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (Ed. J. Barnes). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. (Ed. and Trans. G. A. Kennedy, 2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, F. (1614). The charge of Sir Francis Bacon Knight, his Maiesties Attourney generall, touching duells vpon an information in the Star-chamber against Priest and Wright. With the decree of the Star-chamber in the same cause (2nd ed.). London: STC.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, L. C. (2004). In S. K. Strange & J. Zupko (Eds.), “Stoic Emotion, in Stoicism: Traditions and transformations (pp. 250–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bevir, M. (2002). How to be an intentionalist. History and Theory, 41(2), 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, V. (2002). On some problems with weak intentionalism for intellectual history. History and Theory, 41(2), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carruthers, M. J. (1990). The book of memory: A study of memory in medieval culture. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cicero. (1928). De Re Publica, De Legibus (Ed. and Trans: C. W. Keyes). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Covino, W. (1994). Magic, rhetoric, and literacy: An eccentric history of the composing imagination. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Graver, M. (2007). Stoicism and emotion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hale, D. G. (1971). The body politic: A political metaphor in renaissance English l iterature. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  13. Hannah, R. (1925). Francis Bacon, the political orator. In Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking in Honor of James Albert Winans (pp. 91–132). New York. The Century Co.Google Scholar
  14. Institutio Oratoria (The Orator’s. Education). (2001). In D. A. Russell (Ed. and Trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. James, M. (1986). Society, politics and culture: Studies in early modern England. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James, S. (1997). Passion and action: The emotions in seventeenth-century philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jardine, L., & Stewart, A. (1998). Hostage to fortune: The troubled life of Francis Bacon. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
  18. Lanham, R. A. (1991). A handlist of rhetorical terms (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lisska, A. (1996). Aquinas’s theory of natural law: An analytic reconstruction. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  20. Mack, P. (2002). Elizabethan rhetoric: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quarles, F. (1635). Quarles’ emblems (2nd ed.). London: STC.Google Scholar
  22. Scholz, B. F. (1999). Ekphrasis and Enargeia in Quintilian’s Institutionis Oratoriae Libri XII. In P. L. Oesterreich & T. O. Sloan (Eds.), Rhetorica movet: Studies in historical and modern rhetoric in honor of Heinrich F. Plett (pp. 3–24). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, D. L. (1999). The Stuart parliaments 1603–1689. London. Arnold.Google Scholar
  24. Sonnino, L. A. (1968). A handbook to sixteenth-century rhetoric. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Sontag, S. 1978. Illness as metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  26. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., & Heath, D. D. (1861-1879). The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. III). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  27. Strange, S. K. (2004). The Stoics on the voluntariness of the passions. In S. K. Strange & J. Zupko (Eds.), Stoicism: traditions and transformations (pp. 32–51). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Walker, A. D. (1993). Enargeia and the spectator in Greek historiography. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 123, 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wallace, K. R. (1967). Francis Bacon on the nature of man: The faculties of man’s soul: Understanding, reason, imagination, memory, will, and appetite. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wallace, K. R. (1971). Chief guides for the study of Bacon’s speeches. Studies in the Literary Imagination, 4(1), 173–188.Google Scholar
  31. White, R. S. (1996). Natural law in English renaissance literature. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations