Skip to main content

Murdering Souls and Killing Bodies: Understanding Spiritual and Physical Sin in Late-Medieval English Devotional Works

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Conjunctions of Mind, Soul and Body from Plato to the Enlightenment

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 15))

Abstract

This chapter argues that writers of late-medieval English vernacular literature—medical, scientific, theological, homiletic, dramatic, devotional and didactic—maintained and developed a subtle and complex understanding of the body and the soul as essentially and radically unlike in characteristics and nature, yet simultaneously bound together in indissoluble relationship to create individual human identities. Yet this relationship itself was not seen as unchanging; writers introduced intriguing inversions and anomalies into their accounts of soul-body identities and relationships by posing them in the context of the long and changing histories of individual and human-wide salvation or damnation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the modern fascination with this genre, from a variety of critical perspectives, see, e.g., editions in Conlee (1991); Ackerman (1962); Utley (1972); Bossy (1976); Matsuda (1997); Brent (2001); Raskolnikov (2009), esp. intro and Chap. 2.

  2. 2.

    See, e.g., Langland, (1995), vol. 1, p. 568; B text, Passus XV l. 11: the dreamer is instructed by ‘a sotil thyng withalle–Oon withouten tonge and teeth’, which proves to be the soul.

  3. 3.

    The author claims to be quoting John Damascene.

  4. 4.

    See Books 4–6 for the author’s contrasting treatment of the different parts of the body and their development over the life-cycle.

  5. 5.

    Again allegedly quoting John Damascene.

  6. 6.

    Bynum (1991b p. 151). But note the brilliant succeeding argument on how the feminine might be revalued through association with the incarnate bodily form of Christ.

  7. 7.

    Cf. also Fisher (1876, p. 300).

  8. 8.

    See Raskolnikov (2009, pp. 20–24) for a brief survey of the long history of this association. For more detail, Bynum (1991a).

  9. 9.

    Raskolnikov (2009 pp. 24, 109–110, 117–118, 128).

  10. 10.

    See, e.g., Small (1862, p. 122): ‘A human soul is Christ’s spouse’ [‘mannes sawel ess Cristes spouse’].

  11. 11.

    Seymour (1975, pp. 95, 90); emphasis mine.

  12. 12.

    Seymour (1975)The sailor/ship analogy derives ultimately from Aristotle’s De Anima. For the rider/steed metaphor, see the Middle English Body and Soul debate ‘Als I lay in a winteris nyt’, in Conlee, (1991, pp. 18–39), where Body describes how he ‘bore thee [Soul] on my back’ everywhere (p. 33, l. 266), while Soul alleges that ‘With your teeth you took the bridle’, and ‘ran about and brayed madly’. (p. 31, ll. 219 and 228: ‘Wedir I yede vp or doun,/That I ne bar the on my bac’; ‘With thi teth the bridel thouz lauzt’; ‘renne aboute and breyd wod’). See also the examination of this steed and rider metaphor in Vogel (1948). For an adult/child metaphor, see Halliwell (1855, p. 28), where Body complains that God gave Soul power as if Body were child, obeying its master for fear of a beating; ‘as a chyld his master dothe obbaye/…for feyre he schuld be bete’.

  13. 13.

    Comper (1917, p. 57). Cf. similarly, but without ascription to Plato, in Comper (1917, p. 6).

  14. 14.

    Small (1862, pp. 129–130). See also Rawcliffe (2006), esp. pp. 46 and 49.

  15. 15.

    Chaps 7–16 of Bartolomaeus Book III deal especially with the workings of the soul in the body.

  16. 16.

    See article by Karen Pratt, this volume.

  17. 17.

    See e.g., Bynum (1995); for a particular analysis of the long history of the horse and rider analogy, see Vogel (1948, pp. 31–36).

  18. 18.

    E.g. Matsuda (1997, p. 132), citing Louise Dudley, The Egyptian Elements in the Legend of the Body and Soul (1911). Cf. Utley (1972), esp. p. 691.

  19. 19.

    For another clear account of the apparent transfer of characteristics between Body and Soul in these debates, see Bossy (1976, pp. 144–163, esp. pp. 146–154). For a similar analysis of rationality displayed by the body in the Latin tradition, Brent (2001, pp. 13–18).

  20. 20.

    British Library Additional MS 37049, fol. 40r.

  21. 21.

    For assertions of the homiletic origins of the genre, see, e.g., Utley (1972, p. 691); Matsuda (1997), pp. 130–146 and 257–258); Reichl (2000, p. 228). For the debates and popular devotion, see Ackerman (1962). Ackerman is almost invariably cited in this context—see, e.g., Raskolnikov (2009, p. 110).

  22. 22.

    Raskolnikov (2009, esp. pp. 4–6); Matsuda (1997, p. 254).

  23. 23.

    Ackerman (1962), esp. pp. 549–551.

  24. 24.

    de Irlandia (1926, pp. 62–64); ‘sa was his saule jn sciens and knawlage…tht js richt perfit’. How, when, and on what grounds the transfer from Paradise to Heaven would have occurred in the absence of the Fall is not made clear.

  25. 25.

    In this dispute, unlike most others, the soul is apparently bound for purgatory rather than hell.

  26. 26.

    Fisher (1876), p. 304. Cf. de Irlandia (1965), p. 79.

  27. 27.

    She adds, ‘although they sometimes admitted it was odd.’ The whole of her Chap. 7, “Somatomorphic Soul and Visio Dei: The Beatific Vision Controversy and its Background” is relevant.

Bibliography

Manuscript

Printed primary sources

  • Anonymous. (1992–1995). “The Childe of Bristowe”. In English Poetry: the English Poetry Full-text Database. Cambridge: Chadwick-Healey. Accessed 7 June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine. (1998). The city of God against the pagans (Ed. and trans: R. W. Dyson). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnum, P. H. (Ed.). (1980). Dives and Pauper (Vol. I, Part 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press (for the Early English Text Society No. 280).

    Google Scholar 

  • Comper, F. M. (Ed.). (1917). The book of the craft of dying; and other early English tracts concerning death. London/New York: Longmans Green and Co./Arno Press (reprinted in 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlee, J. W. (1991). Middle English body and soul debates. In J. W. Conlee (Ed.), Middle English debate poetry: A critical anthology (pp. 18–39). East Lansing: Colleagues Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. T. (Ed.). (1972). The Corpus Christi play of the English Middle Ages. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbe, T. (Ed.). (1905). Mirk’s Festial. London/New York: Early English Text Society/Kraus Reprint Co (E.S. xcvi; reprinted in 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. (1876). In J. E. B. Mayor (Ed.), The English works of John Fisher. London: N. Trübner & Co (Early English Text Society, Extra Series, vol. xxvii).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliwell, J. O. (Ed.). (1855). Early English miscellanies in prose and verse. London: Warton Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Irlandia, J. (1926). In C. MacPherson (Ed.), The Meroure of Wyssdome composed for the use of James IV, King of Scots A.D. 1490. Vol. 1. Edinburgh/London: William Blackwood and Sons Ltd. (Scottish Text Society New Series 19).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Irlandia, J. (1965). In F. Quinn (Ed.), The Meroure of Wyssdome composed for the use of James IV, King of Scots A.D. 1490, (Vol. 2). Edinburgh: William Blackwood & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (1939). A study of three Welsh religious plays. Bala: R. Evans & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langland, W., & Schmidt, A. V. C. (Ed.). (1995). Piers plowman: A parallel-text edition of the A, B, C and Z versions. London/New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, M. C. (Ed.). (1975). On the properties of things: John Trevisa’s translation of Bartholomaeus Anglicus De Proprietatibus Rerum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, T. F., & Nolloth, H. E. (Eds.) (1901). The lay folks’ catechism or the English and Latin Versions of Archbishop Thoresby’s instruction for the people. London/Millwood: Kegan Paul, Trench Trübner & Co/Kraus Reprint (for the Early English Text Society, Original Series No. 118; reprinted in 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. (Ed.). (1862). English metrical homilies from manuscripts of the fourteenth century. Edinburgh: William Paterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • William of Conches. (1997). A dialogue on natural philosophy. (Ed. and trans: I. Ronca & M. Curr). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary sources

  • Ackerman, R. W. (1962). The debate of the body and soul and parochial Christianity. Speculum, 37(4), 541–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossy, M.-A. (1976). Medieval debates of soul and body. Comparative Literature, 28(2), 144–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brent, J. J. (2001). From address to debate: generic considerations in the debate between soul and body. Comitatus, 32(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, C. W. (1991a). Fragmentation and redemption: Essays on gender and the human body in medieval religion. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, C. W. (1991b). “And Woman His Humanity”: Female imagery in the religious writing of the Later Middle Ages. In C. W. Bynum (Ed.), Fragmentation and redemption: Essays on gender and the human body in medieval religion (pp. 151–179). New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, C. W. (1995). The resurrection of the body in western Christianity, 200-1336. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, T. (1997). Death and purgatory in Middle English didactic poetry. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskolnikov, M. (2009). Body against soul: Gender and sowlehele in Middle English allegory. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawcliffe, C. (2006). Leprosy in medieval England. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichl, K. (2000). Debate Verse. In S. Fein (Ed.), Studies in the Harley manuscript: The scribes, contents and social contexts of British Library MS Harley 2253 (pp. 219–239). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utley, F. L. (1972). Dialogues, Debates and Catechisms. In A. E. Hartung, et al. (Eds.), A manual of the writings in Middle English 1050-1500 (pp. 691–696). New Haven: The Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, M. U. (1948). Some aspects of the horse and rider analogy in the debate between the body and the soul. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wopke de Boer, S. (2011). Soul and Body in the Middle Ages: A study of the transformations of the scientia de anima, c. 1260-1360. Doctoral thesis, Nijmegen, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippa Maddern .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maddern, P. (2014). Murdering Souls and Killing Bodies: Understanding Spiritual and Physical Sin in Late-Medieval English Devotional Works. In: Kambaskovic, D. (eds) Conjunctions of Mind, Soul and Body from Plato to the Enlightenment. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9072-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics