Skip to main content

Abstract

We present a theory and associated algorithms to synthesize controllers that may be used to build robust tunable oscillations in biological networks. As an illustration, we build robust tunable oscillations in the celebrated repressilator synthesized by Elowitz and Leibler. The desired oscillations in a set of mRNA’s and proteins are obtained by injecting an oscillatory input as a reference and by synthesizing a dynamic inversion based tracking controller. This approach ensures that the repressilator can exhibit oscillations irrespective of (1) the maximum number of proteins per cell and (2) the ratio of the protein lifetimes to the mRNA lifetimes. The frequency and the amplitude of at least one output (either mRNA or protein) can now be controlled arbitrarily. In addition, we characterize the \({\fancyscript{L}}_2\) gain stability of this 3-node network and generalize it to the case of \(N\)-node networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atkinson MR, Savageau MA, Meyers J, Ninfa A (2003) Development of a genetic circuitry exhibiting toggle switch or oscillatory behavior in escherichia coli. Cell 113(5)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bart-Stan G, Sepulchre R (2007) Analysis of interconnected oscillators by dissipativity theory. IEEE Trans Autom Control 52(2):256–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung SJ, Slotine JJE (2010) On synchronization of coupled Hopf-Kuramoto oscillators with phase delays. IEEE conference on decision and control. Atlanta, GA, pp 3181–3187

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danino T, Mondragon-Palomino O, Tsimring L, Hasty J (2010), A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks. Nature 463

    Google Scholar 

  5. Desoer C, Vidyasagar M (1975) Feedback systems: input-output properties. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elowitz MB, Leibler S (2000) A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nat Lett 403

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fung E, Wong WW, Suen JK, Bulter T, Lee S, Liao J (2005) A synthetic gene-metabolic oscillator. Lett Nat 435

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Ojalvo J, Elowitz MB, Strogatz SH (2004) Modeling a multicellular clock: repressilators coupled by quorum sensing. Proc National Acad Sci 101

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hamadeh AO, Stan GB, Goncalves JM (2010) Constructive synchronization of networked feedback systems. IEEE conference on decision and control. Atlanta, GA, pp 6710–6715

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamadeh AO, Stan GB, Sepulchre R (2012) Global state synchronization in networks of cyclic feedback systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 57(2)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hovakimyan N, Lavretsky E, Sasane A (2007) Dynamic inversion for nonaffine-in-control systems via time-scale separation. Part i. J Dyn Control Syst 13(4)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kharisov E, Kim K, Wang X, Hovakimyan N (2011) Limiting behavior of \(\cal L_1\) adaptive controllers. In: Proceedings of AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference. Portland, OR

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim J, Shin D, Jung S, Heslop-Harrison P, Cho K (2010) A design principle underlying the synchronization of oscillations in cellular systems. J Cell Sci 123(4)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim J, Winfree E (2011) Synthetic in vitro transcriptional oscillators. Mol Syst Biol 7(465)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kulkarni VV, Pao LY, Safonov MG (2011) On stability analysis of systems featuring a multiplicative combination of nonlinear and linear time-invariant feedback. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 21(18)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kulkarni VV, Pao LY, Safonov MG (2011) Positivity preservation properties of the Rantzer multipliers. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(1)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kulkarni VV, Paranjape AA, Ghusinga KR, Hovakimyan N (2010) Synthesis of robust tunable oscillators using mitogen activated protein kinase cascades. Syst Synth Biol 4

    Google Scholar 

  18. Montagne K, Plasson R, Sakai Y, Rondelez Y (2011) Programming an in vitro DNA oscillator using a molecular networking strategy. Mol Syst Biol 7(466)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paranjape AA (2011) Dynamics and control of robotic aircraft with articulated wings. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paranjape AA, Kim J, Chung SJ (2012) Closed-loop perching of aerial robots with articulated flapping wings. IEEE Trans Robot (Submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Safonov M, Kulkarni V (2000) Zames-Falb multipliers for MIMO nonlinearities. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 10(11/12):1025–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Strelkowa N, Barahona M (2010) Switchable genetic oscillator operating in quasi-stable mode. J Roy Soc Interface 7(48)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tigges M, Marquez-Lago T, Stelling J, Fussenegger M (2009) A tunable synthetic mammalian oscillator. Nature 457(4)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Varigonda S, Georgiou T (2001) Dynamics of relay-relaxation oscillators. IEEE Trans Autom Control 46(4)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vidyasagar M (1993) Nonlinear systems analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  26. Willems J (1971) The analysis of feedback systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zames G, Falb P (1968) Stability conditions for systems with monotone and slope-restricted nonlinearities. SIAM J Control Optim 6:89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Michael Elowitz (California Institute of Technology) for clarifying our doubts on the ODE model of the EL repressilator. This research is supported, in part, by the NSF CAREER Award 0845650, NSF BIO Computing, NSF Computing and Communications Foundationsx, and the U.S. Army Research Office Award W911NF-10-1-0296. Competing Interests: There are none. Author’s Contributions: VVK derived Lemmae 1 and 2, and Theorems 3 and 4. VVK, AAP, and SJC synthesized the dynamic inversion control. AAP simulated the closed loop system using MATLAB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishwesh V. Kulkarni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kulkarni, V.V., Paranjape, A.A., Chung, SJ. (2014). Robust Tunable Transcriptional Oscillators Using Dynamic Inversion. In: Kulkarni, V., Stan, GB., Raman, K. (eds) A Systems Theoretic Approach to Systems and Synthetic Biology I: Models and System Characterizations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9041-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics