Factors Influencing the Long-Term Sustainability of Managed Realignment

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)


Managed realignment can offer a sustainable long-term management option for coasts and estuaries by reducing the pressures on flood defences and compensating for habitat lost due to developments or coastal squeeze. This chapter discusses some of the factors influencing the long-term sustainability of managed realignment taking into consideration the UK context and experience. The sustainability of managed realignment at the local level depends on the availability and suitability of land to deliver set objectives and greatly on stakeholder support. The implementation of more than 50 schemes in the last two decades in the UK indicates that these factors have not hindered the implementation of managed realignment at the national scale. However, managed realignment is not the best option for all coastal areas. It is certain that managed realignment schemes will continue to be built in the UK. However, managed realignment is not a universal panacea, it is not possible to implement this policy everywhere, and schemes are unlikely to be viewed as a success from all perspectives. External funding sources and extensive stakeholder consultation are required to support the scale of managed realignment implementation planned in the future.


Local Stakeholder Coastal Habitat Flood Risk Management Intertidal Habitat Flood Defence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ABP Research and Consultancy Ltd. (1998). Review of coastal habitat creation, restoration and recharge schemes (Report No. R 909), p. 78. Southampton: ABP Research & Consultancy Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Adaptation Sub-Committee. (2013). Progress report 2013—managing the land in a changing climate. Committee on Climate Change, p. 136. Accessed 29 Dec 2013.
  3. Atkinson, P. W., Crooks, S., Grant, A., & Rehfisch, M. M. (2001). The success of creation and restoration schemes in producing intertidal habitat suitable for waterbirds. English Nature Research (Report No. 425). English Nature, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  4. Burgess, K., Pontee, N., Wilson, T., Lee, S. C., & Cox, R. (2013). Steart Coastal management project: Engineering challenges in a hyper-tidal environment. Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters 2013, Aberdeen, 17–20 September 2013.Google Scholar
  5. Canning, P., & Pontee, N. (2013). Assessing habitat compensation requirements in estuary environments. Coasts, Marine structures and breakwaters 2013, Aberdeen, 17–20 September 2013. Institution of Civil Engineering. Accessed 8 June 2014.
  6. Defra. (2003). Managed realignment review. Defra/Environment Agency Policy Theme R&D Project FD2008, Defra Publications, Defra-Flood Management Division, Ergon House, London SW1P, 2003, 2AL. p. 222 + App.Google Scholar
  7. Defra. (2006). Shoreline management plan guidance. Volume 1: Aims and requirements, March 2006. Accessed 29 Dec 2013.
  8. Defra/EA. (2006). National evaluation of the costs of meeting coastal environmental requirements NEoCOMER). R&D technical report FD2017/TR Joint Defra/EA flood and Coastal erosion risk management R&D programme. Report produced by Risk and Policy Analysts Ltd, Royal Haskoning UK Ltd and ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd for Defra/EA, April 2006, p. 2.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (1992). ‘Habitats Directive’—Council directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. European community directive adopted in 1992.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2009). Council Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds (the codified and consolidated version of council directive 79/409/EEC as amended).Google Scholar
  11. Latham, D., Pontee, N., Monroe, B., & Bond, I. (2013). Reconstructing habitats in a heavily industrialised estuary: From brine wells to salt marsh. Coasts, Marine structures and breakwaters 2013, Aberdeen, 17–20 September 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Mazik, K., Musk, W., Dawes, O., Solyanko, K., Brown, Su., Mander, L., & Elliott, M., (2010). Managed realignment as compensation for the loss of intertidal mudflat: A short term solution to a long term problem? Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 90(1), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morris, R. K. A. (2012). Managed realignment: A sediment management perspective. Ocean & Coastal Management, 65, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mossman, H. L., Davy, A. J., & Grant, A. (2012). Does managed coastal realignment create saltmarshes with ‘equivalent biological characteristics’ to natural reference sites? Journal of Applied Ecology, 49(6), 1446–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nottage, A., & Robinson, P. (2005). The saltmarsh creation handbook: A project manager’s guide to the creation of saltmarsh and intertidal mudflat. London: RSPB, Sandy and CIWEM.Google Scholar
  16. Park, R. (2013). Challenges in Wales. Presentation given at the ABPmer Habitat Creation Conference, 20th November, 2013. London: Institution of Civil Engineers. Accessed 29 Dec 2013.
  17. Pontee, N. (2014). Accounting for siltation in the design of intertidal creation schemes. Ocean and Coastal management, 88, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pontee, N. I. (2003). Designing sustainable estuarine intertidal habitats. Engineering sustainability. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 156(Issue ES3), 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pontee N. I., & Parsons, A. (2010). A review of coastal risk management in the UK. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers. Maritime Engineering Journal, 163(MA1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pontee, N. I., & Parsons, A. (2012). Adaptation as part of sustainable shoreline management in England and Wales. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers. Maritime Engineering Journal, 165(MA3), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pontee, N. I., Hamer, B. A., & Turney, P. D. (2005). Sustainable flood risk management in European estuaries. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on coastal management and engineering in Middle East (ARABIAN COAST 2005), Dubai, 27th–29th November 2005. Theme D: COASTAL RISK MANAGEMENT. Accessed 4 Jan 2014.
  22. Pontee, N. I., Parsons, A., & Ashby Crane, R. (2011). Local empowerment: A barrier to strategic flood and coastal risk management. Abstract for presentation at: Water & Environment 2011: CIWEM’s annual conference, big society—future environment, 06 Apr 11–07 Apr 11, Olympia, London.Google Scholar
  23. Pontee, N., Ashby Crane, R., & Batty, L. (2013). A fresh look at managed realignment: Estuary wide and long term sustainability. Coasts, Marine structures and breakwaters 2013, Aberdeen, 17–20 September 2013. Accessed 1 Feb 2014.
  24. Roberts, T. H. (1991). Habitat value of man-made coastal marshes in Florida. US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, 1991, Wetlands Research Programme Technical Report WRP-RE-2, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  25. Rowlands, O. E. (2011). Current trends in the costs of managed realignment and regulated tidal exchange. Schemes in the UK. Unpublished MSc thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, p. 81.Google Scholar
  26. RSPB. (2002). Seas of change—the potential area for inter-tidal habitat creation around the coast of mainland Britain. Authors: Pilcher, R., Burston, P., Kindleysides, D., & Davis., R. October 2002, p. 35.Google Scholar
  27. Toft, A. R., & Madrell, R. J. A. (1995). Guide to the understanding and management of saltmarshes. National Rivers Authority, Project 444, pp. 1–213.Google Scholar
  28. Tovey, E. L., Pontee, N. I., & Harvey, R. (2009). Award winning managed realignment: Hesketh out Marsh West. Target Journal: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Sustainable Engineering, 162(4), 223–228.Google Scholar
  29. Walsh, K. (2008). Food fight. New civil engineer, 2008. Issue dated 109th April 2008 ‘Food fight’, pp. 14–15. Accessed 13 Jan 2014.
  30. Wheeler, D., Tan, S., Pontee, N., & Pygott, J. (2008). Alkborough scheme reduces extreme water levels in the Humber Estuary and creates new habitat. FLOODrisk 2008—the European conference on flood risk management research in to practice 30 September–2 October 2008 Keble College, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Technology Leader Coastal Planning & Engineering, CH2M HILLSwindonUK

Personalised recommendations