Advertisement

Methods of Implementation

Chapter
  • 564 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)

Abstract

This chapter describes the different methods most commonly used in the implementation of managed realignment. Following the wider definition of managed realignment proposed in Chap. 2, the implementation of managed realignment is more widespread than one might initially anticipate. Many approaches described in the literature reflect different ways in which managed realignment can be implemented. These approaches are grouped into five methods of implementation: removal of defences; breach of defences; realignment of defences; controlled tidal restoration (which includes regulated tidal exchange and controlled reduced tide) and managed retreat. This chapter provides examples of implementation worldwide and describes and contrasts each one of these methods.

Keywords

Flood Risk Tidal Creek Flood Risk Management Intertidal Habitat Compulsory Purchasing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, K. S., Ryan, A., & Measham, T. G. (2012). Managed retreat of coastal communities: Understanding responses to projected sea level rise. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(4), 409–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchard, O., Jacobs, S., Cox, T. J. S., Maris, T., Vrebos, D., Van Braeckel, A., & Meire, P. (2011). A new technique for tidal habitat restoration: Evaluation of its hydrological potentials. Ecological Engineering, 37, 1849–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper, N. J., Wilson, S., & Hanson, T. (2013). Realignment of Littlehaven Sea Wall, South Tyneside, UK. Proceedings of the Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters Conference (Edinburgh, 18-20 September 2013), Institution of Civil Engineers, London 10 p. http://www.ice.org.uk/ICE_Web_Portal/media/Events/Breakwaters%202013/Realignment-of-Littlehaven-Sea-Wall,-South-Tyneside,-UK.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2014.
  4. Cox, T., Maris, T., De Vleeschauwer, P., De Mulder, T., Soetaert, K., & Meire, P. (2006). Flood control areas as an opportunity to restore estuarine habitat. Ecological Engineering, 28, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Esteves, L. S., & Thomas, K. (2014). Managed realignment in practice in the UK: Results from two independent surveys. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 70,407–413.Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, N. L., & Nordstrom, K. F. (2013). Removing shore protection structures to facilitate migration of landforms and habitats on the bayside of a barrier spit. Geomorphology, 199, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobs, S., Beauchard, O., Struyf, E., Cox, T., Maris, T., & Meire, P. (2009). Restoration of tidal freshwater vegetation using controlled reduced tide (CRT) along the Schelde Estuary (Belgium). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 85(3), 368–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maris, T., Cox, T., Temmerman, S., De Vleeschauwer, P., Van Damme, S., De Mulder, T., Van den Bergh, E., & Meire, P. (2007). Tuning the tide: creating ecological conditions for tidal marsh development in a flood control area. Hydrobiologia 588, 31–43.Google Scholar
  9. Nottage, A., & Robertson, P. (2005). The saltmarsh creation handbook: A project manager’s guide to the creation of saltmarsh and intertidal mudflat. London: RSPB.Google Scholar
  10. Reisinger, A., Lawrence, J., Hart, G., & Chapman, R. (2014). From coping to resilience: The role of managed retreat in highly developed coastal regions of New Zealand. In B. Glavovic, R. Kaye, M. Kelly, & A. Travers (Eds.), Climate change and the coast: Building resilient communities. London: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  11. Roca, E., Gamboa, G., & Tàbara, J. D. (2008). Assessing the multidimensionality of coastal erosion risks: Public participation and multicriteria analysis in a Mediterranean Coastal System. Risk Analysis, 28(2), 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Symonds, A. M., & Collins, M. B. (2007). The establishment and degeneration of a temporary creek system in response to managed coastal realignment: The Wash, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32(12), 1783–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Teuchies, J., Beauchard, O., Jacobs, S., & Meire, P. (2012). Evolution of sediment metal concentrations in a tidal marsh restoration project. Science of the Total Environment, 419(1), 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vandenbruwaene, W., Maris, T., Cox, T. J. S., Cahoon, D. R., Meire, P., & Temmerman, S. (2011). Sedimentation and response to sea-level rise of a restored marsh with reduced tidal exchange: Comparison with a natural tidal marsh. Geomorphology, 130, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyBournemouth UniversityPooleUK

Personalised recommendations