Current Perceptions About Managed Realignment

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)


Despite the diversity of managed realignment approaches adopted in different countries, there are certain elements of commonality that provide relevant lessons that can be applicable to facilitate and improve the implementation of managed realignment in general. Public perception and stakeholders’ engagement are often cited as a factor limiting the wider implementation of managed realignment. Considering the scale and importance of managed realignment in national and regional strategies in many countries, gaining wider public acceptance is fundamental. To take adequate actions that can improve social uptake of managed realignment, it is first necessary to understand the differences between public perception and the current knowledge of practitioners and researchers. This chapter describes the current thinking of researchers and practitioners about the potential, performance and limitations of managed realignment and contrasts these with the perception of stakeholders. Critical differences are identified and ways to address these with the aim to increase the social acceptance of managed realignment are suggested.


Flood Risk Project Design Suitable Land Social Perception Public Acceptance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adams, C. A., Andrews, J. E., & Jickells, T. (2012). Nitrous oxide and methane fluxes vs. carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous burial in new intertidal and saltmarsh sediments. Science of the Total Environment, 434, 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, K. S., Ryan, A., & Measham, T. G. (2012). Managed retreat of coastal communities: Understanding responses to projected sea level rise. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(4), 409–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida, D., Neto, C., Esteves, L. S., & Costa, J. C. (2014). The impacts of land-use changes on the recovery of saltmarshes in Portugal. Ocean and Coastal Management, 92, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burden, A., Garbutt, R. A., Evans, C. D., Jones, D. L., & Cooper, D. M. (2013). Carbon sequestration and biogeochemical cycling in a saltmarsh subject to coastal managed realignment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 120, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cearreta, A., García-Artola, A., Leorri, E., Irabien, M. J., & Masque, P. (2013). Recent environmental evolution of regenerated salt marshes in the southern Bay of Biscay: Anthropogenic evidences in their sedimentary record. Journal of Marine Systems, 109–110, 203–S212.Google Scholar
  6. Committee on Climate Change. (2013). Chapter 5: Regulating services—coastal habitats (pp. 92–107).
  7. Craft, C., Megonigal, P., Broome, S., Stevenson, J., Freese, R., Cornell, J., Zheng, L., Sacco, J. (2003). The pace of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora marshes. Ecological Applications, 13, 1417–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davy, A. J., Brown, M. J. H., Mossman, H. L., & Grant, A. (2011). Colonization of a newly developing salt marsh: Disentangling independent effects of elevation and redox potential on halophytes. Journal of Ecology, 99, 1350–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esteves, L. S. (2013). Is managed realignment a sustainable long-term coastal management approach? Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 65(1), 933–938.Google Scholar
  10. Esteves, L. S., & Thomas, K. (2014). Managed realignment in practice in the UK: results from two independent surveys. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 70, 407–413.Google Scholar
  11. French, P. W. (2006). Managed realignment—The developing story of a comparatively new approach to soft engineering. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 67(3), 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garbutt, A., & Wolters, M. (2008). The natural regeneration of salt marsh on formerly reclaimed land. Applied Vegetation Science, 11, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goeldner-Gianella, L. (2007). Perceptions and attitudes toward de-polderisation in Europe: A comparison of five opinion surveys in France and the UK. Journal of Coastal Research, 23(5), 1218–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harman, B. P., Heyenga, S., Taylor, B. M., & Fletcher, C. S. (2014). Global lessons for adapting coastal communities to protect against storm surge inundation. Journal of Coastal Research (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Ledoux, L., Cornell, S., O’Riordan, T., Harvey, R., & Banyard, L. (2005). Towards sustainable flood and coastal management: Identifying drivers of, and obstacles to, managed realignment. Land Use Policy, 22(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luisetti, T., Turner, R. K., Bateman, I. J., Morse-Jones, S., Adams, C. & Fonseca, L. (2011). Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England. Ocean & Coastal Management, 54(3), 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marquiegui, M. A., & Aguirrezabalaga, F. (2009). Colonization process by macrobenthic infauna after a managed coastal realignment in the Bidasoa estuary (Bay of Biscay, NE Atlantic). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 84, 598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGlashan, D. J. (2003). Managed relocation: An assessment of its feasibility as a coastal management option. The Geographical Journal, 169(1), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Midgley, S., & McGlashan, D. J. (2004). Planning and management of a proposed managed realignment project: Bothkennar, Forth Estuary, Scotland. Marine Policy, 28, 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morris, R. K. A. (2012). Managed realignment: A sediment management perspective. Ocean & Coastal Management, 65, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mossman, H. L., Davy, A. J., & Grant, A. (2012). Does managed coastal realignment create saltmarshes with ‘equivalent biological characteristics’ to natural reference sites? Journal of Applied Ecology, 49(6), 1446–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Myatt-Bell, L. B., Scrimshaw, M. D., Lester, J. N., & Potts, J. S. (2002). Public perception of managed realignment: Brancaster West Marsh, North Norfolk, UK. Marine Policy, 26(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Myatt, L. B., Scrimshaw, M. D., & Lester, J. N. (2003a). Public perceptions and attitudes towards a forthcoming managed realignment scheme: Freiston Shore, Lincolnshire, UK. Ocean & Coastal Management, 46(6–7), 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myatt, L. B., Scrimshaw, M. D., & Lester, J. N. (2003b). Public perceptions and attitudes towards an established managed realignment scheme: Orplands, Essex, UK. Journal of Environmental Management, 68(2), 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niven, R. J., & Bardsley, D. K. (2013). Planned retreat as a management response to coastal risk: A case study from the Fleurieu Peninsula, South Australia. Regional Environmental Change, 13, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parrott, A., & Burningham, H. (2008). Opportunities of, and constraints to, the use of intertidal agri-environment schemes for sustainable coastal defence: A case study of the Blackwater Estuary, southeast England. Ocean & Coastal Management, 51(4), 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pethick, J. (2002). Estuarine and tidal wetland restoration in the United Kingdom: Policy versus practice. Restoration Ecology, 10(3), 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reisinger, A., Lawrence, J., Hart, G., & Chapman, R. (2014). From coping to resilience: The role of managed retreat in highly developed coastal regions of New Zealand. In B. Glavovic, R. Kaye, M. Kelly, & A. Travers (Eds.), Climate change and the coast: Building resilient communities. CRC Press: London.Google Scholar
  29. RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors). (2013). Rural Land Market Survey H1.
  30. Roca, E., & Villares, M. (2012). Public perceptions of managed realignment strategies: The case study of the Ebro Delta in the Mediterranean basin. Ocean & Coastal Management, 60, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santín, C., de la Rosa, J. M., Knicker, H., Otero, X. L., Álvarez, M. Á, González-Vila, F. J. (2009). Effects of reclamation and regeneration processes on organic matter from estuarine soils and sediments. Organic Geochemistry, 40, 931–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. SOGREAH. (2011). Etude de Faisabilite – Depolderisation partielle et eventuelle des Bas-Champs du Vimeu – La recherché d’un avenir sur un territoire perenne. Phase 1: Etat des lieux – diagnostic du territoire. Chapitre 8: Approche géographie sociale – perceptions.Google Scholar
  33. Spencer, K. L., Cundy, A. B., Davies-Hearn, S., Hughes, R., Turner, S. & MacLeod, C. L. (2008). Physicochemical changes in sediments at Orplands Farm, Essex, UK following 8 years of managed realignment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 76(3), 608–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spencer, K. L., & Harvey, G. L. (2012). Understanding system disturbance and ecosystem services in restored saltmarshes: Integrating physical and biogeochemical processes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 106, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, B. M., & McAllister, R. R. J. (2013). Bringing it all together: Researcher dialogue to improve synthesis in regional climate adaptation in South-East Queensland, Australia. Regional environmental change. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0517-4.Google Scholar
  36. Wolters, M., Garbutt, A., & Bakker, J. P. (2005). Salt-marsh restoration: Evaluating the success of de-embankments in north-west Europe. Biological Conservation, 123, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zedler, J. B., & Adam, P. (2002). Salt marshes. In M. R. Perrow & A. J. Davy (Eds.), Handbook of ecological restoration. Restoration in practice (Vol. 2, pp. 238–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyBournemouth UniversityPooleUK

Personalised recommendations