Abstract
Evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-devo) is a loose conglomeration of research programs in the life sciences with two main axes: (a) the evolution of development, or inquiry into the pattern and processes of how ontogeny varies and changes over time; and, (b) the developmental basis of evolution, or inquiry into the causal impact of ontogenetic processes on evolutionary trajectories—both in terms of constraint and facilitation. Philosophical issues are found along both axes surrounding concepts such as evolvability, novelty, and modularity. The developmental basis of evolution has garnered much attention because it speaks to the possibility of revising a standard construal of evolutionary theory, but the evolution of development harbors its own conceptual questions. This article addresses the heterogeneity of Evo-devo’s conglomerate structure (including disagreements over its individuation), as well as the concepts and controversies of philosophical interest pertaining to the evolution of development and the developmental basis of evolution. Future research will benefit from a shift away from global theorizing toward the scientific practices of Evo-devo.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The difference between “diminish” and “complement” can be subtle. Developmental explanations do not necessarily expose adaptive explanations as false and sometimes reveal their incompleteness. But these interpretations turn on whether developmental and adaptive explanations are thought of as belonging to the same type (e.g., causal explanation), and whether they are understood to be explaining the same target phenomenon.
References
Alberch, P., & Alberch, J. (1981). Heterochronic mechanisms of morphological diversification and evolutionary change in the neotropical salamander, Bolitoglossa occidentalis (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). Journal of Morphology, 167, 249–264.
Alberch, P., & Gale, E. A. (1985). A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: Digital reduction in amphibians. Evolution, 39, 8–23.
Amundson, R. (1994). Two concepts of constraint: Adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philosophy of Science, 61, 556–578.
Amundson, R. (1998). Typology reconsidered: Two doctrines on the history of evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy, 13, 153–177.
Amundson, R. (2005). The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: Roots of Evo-devo. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ankeny, R., & Leonelli, S. (2011). What’s so special about model organisms? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42, 313–323.
Arthur, W. (2002). The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature, 415, 757–764.
Arthur, W. (2011). Evolution: A developmental approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bever, G., Gauthier, J., & Wagner, G. (2011). Finding the frame shift: Digit loss, developmental variability, and the origin of the avian hand. Evolution & Development, 13, 269–279.
Bolker, J. A. (1995). Model systems in developmental biology. BioEssays, 17, 451–455.
Brigandt, I. (2007). Typology now: Homology and developmental constraints explain evolvability. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 709–725.
Brigandt, I. (2010). Beyond reduction and pluralism: Toward an epistemology of explanatory integration in biology. Erkenntnis, 73, 295–311.
Brigandt, I., & Love, A. C. (2010). Evolutionary novelty and the Evo-devo synthesis: Field notes. Evolutionary Biology, 37, 93–99.
Brigandt, I., & Love, A. C. (2012). Conceptualizing evolutionary novelty: Moving beyond definitional debates. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 318, 417–427.
Calcott, B. (2009). Lineage explanations: Explaining how biological mechanisms change. British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 60, 51–78.
Carroll, S. B. (2005). Evolution at two levels: On genes and form. PLoS Biology, 3, e245.
Carroll, S. B. (2008). Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: A genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell, 134, 25–36.
Davidson, E. H. (2001). Genomic regulatory systems: Development and evolution. San Diego: Academic.
Davidson, E. H. (2006). The regulatory genome: Gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. San Diego: Academic.
De Robertis, E. M. (2008). Evo-devo: Variations on ancestral themes. Cell, 132, 185–195.
DiTeresi, C. A. (2010). Taming variation: Typological thinking and scientific practice in developmental biology. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Duboule, D. (2010). The Evo-devo comet. EMBO Reports, 11, 489.
Erwin, D. H. (2011). Evolutionary uniformitarianism. Developmental Biology, 357, 27–34.
Gerhart, J., & Kirschner, M. (2007). The theory of facilitated variation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 104, 8582–8589.
Gilbert, S. F., & Epel, D. (2009). Ecological developmental biology: Integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution. Sunderland: Sinauer.
Gompel, N., Prud’homme, B., Wittkopp, P. J., Kassner, V. A., & Carroll, S. B. (2005). Chance caught on the wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila. Nature, 433, 481–487.
Gordon, K., & Ruvinsky, I. (2012). Tempo and mode in evolution of transcriptional regulation. PLoS Genetics, 8, e1002432.
Griesemer, J. (2011). Heuristic reductionism and the relative significance of epigenetic inheritance in evolution. In B. Hallgrímmson & B. K. Hall (Eds.), Epigenetics: Linking genotype and phenotype in development and evolution (pp. 14–40). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hall, B. K. (1997). Phylotypic stage or phantom: Is there a highly conserved embryonic stage in vertebrates? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 461–463.
Hall, B. K. (1999). Evolutionary developmental biology (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hall, B. K. (2002). Palaeontology and evolutionary developmental biology: A science of the nineteenth and twenty-first centuries. Palaeontology, 45, 647–669.
Hallgrímmson, B., & Hall, B. K. (Eds.). (2011). Epigenetics: Linking genotype and phenotype in development and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hendrikse, J. L., Parsons, T. E., & Hallgrímmson, B. (2007). Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology. Evolution & Development, 9, 393–401.
Hinman, V. F., Yankura, K. A., & McCauley, B. S. (2009). Evolution of gene regulatory network architectures: Examples of subcircuit conservation and plasticity between classes of echinoderms. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1789, 326–332.
Hoekstra, H. E., & Coyne, J. A. (2007). The locus of evolution: Evo-devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution, 61, 995–1016.
Hopwood, N. (2007). A history of normal plates, tables and stages in vertebrate embryology. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 51, 1–26.
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jablonski, D. (2005). Evolutionary innovations in the fossil record: The intersection of ecology, development, and macroevolution. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 304, 504–519.
Jenner, R. A. (2006). Unburdening Evo-devo: Ancestral attractions, model organisms, and basal baloney. Development Genes and Evolution, 216, 385–394.
Jenner, R. A., & Wills, M. A. (2007). The choice of model organisms in Evo-devo. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 311–319.
Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. E., & Waters, C. K. (2006). Scientific pluralism (Minnesota studies in philosophy of science, Vol. 19). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B., & Schilling, T. F. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Developmental Dynamics, 203, 253–310.
Kirschner, M., & Gerhart, J. (1998). Evolvability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 95, 8420–8427.
Kuratani, S. (2009). Modularity, comparative embryology and Evo-devo: Developmental dissection of evolving body plans. Developmental Biology, 332, 61–69.
Laubichler, M. D. (2009). Form and function in Evo Devo: Historical and conceptual reflections. In M. D. Laubichler & J. Maienschein (Eds.), Form and function in developmental evolution (pp. 10–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Laubichler, M. (2010). Evolutionary developmental biology offers a significant challenge to the neo-Darwinian paradigm. In F. J. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 199–212). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Laubichler, M. D., & Maienschein, J. (Eds.). (2007). From embryology to Evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewens, T. (2009). What is wrong with typolological thinking? Philosophy of Science, 76, 355–371.
Liem, K. F. (1990). Key evolutionary innovations, differential diversity, and symecomorphosis. In M. H. Nitecki (Ed.), Evolutionary innovations (pp. 147–170). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Love, A. C. (2003a). Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology. Biology and Philosophy, 18, 309–345.
Love, A. C. (2003b). Evolvability, dispositions, and intrinsicality. Philosophy of Science, 70, 1015–1027.
Love, A. C. (2006). Evolutionary morphology and Evo-devo: Hierarchy and novelty. Theory in Biosciences, 124, 317–333.
Love, A. C. (2007a). Functional homology and homology of function: Biological concepts and philosophical consequences. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 691–708.
Love, A. C. (2007b). Morphological and paleontological perspectives for a history of Evo-devo. In M. D. Laubichler & J. Maienschein (Eds.), From embryology to Evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution (pp. 267–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Love, A. C. (2008). Explaining evolutionary innovation and novelty: Criteria of explanatory adequacy and epistemological prerequisites. Philosophy of Science, 75, 874–886.
Love, A. C. (2009a). Marine invertebrates, model organisms, and the modern synthesis: Epistemic values, Evo-devo, and exclusion. Theory in Biosciences, 128, 19–42.
Love, A. C. (2009b). Typology reconfigured: From the metaphysics of essentialism to the epistemology of representation. Acta Biotheoretica, 57, 51–75.
Love, A. C. (2010a). Idealization in evolutionary developmental investigation: A tension between phenotypic plasticity and normal stages. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 365, 679–690.
Love, A. C. (2010b). Rethinking the structure of evolutionary theory for an extended synthesis. In M. Pigliucci & G. B. Müller (Eds.), Evolution—The extended synthesis (pp. 403–441). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Love, A. C. (2011). Darwin’s functional reasoning and homology. In M. Wheeler (Ed.), 150 years of evolution: Darwin’s impact on contemporary thought & culture (pp. 49–67). San Diego: SDSU Press.
Love, A. C., & Raff, R. A. (2003). Knowing your ancestors: Themes in the history of Evo-devo. Evolution & Development, 5, 327–330.
Lynch, M. (2007). The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 104, 8597–8604.
Lynch, V. J., & Wagner, G. P. (2008). Resurrecting the role of transcription factor change in developmental evolution. Evolution, 62, 2131–2154.
Lynch, V. J., May, G., & Wagner, G. P. (2011). Regulatory evolution through divergence of a phosphoswitch in the transcription factor CEBPB. Nature, 480, 383–386.
Maynard Smith, J., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D., & Wolpert, L. (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 60, 265–287.
Mayr, E. (1960). The emergence of evolutionary novelties. In S. Tax (Ed.), Evolution after Darwin. Vol. 1: The evolution of life, its origin, history and future (pp. 349–380). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mikó, I., Friedrich, F., Yoder, M., Hines, H., Deitz, L., Bertone, M., Seltmann, K., Wallace, M., & Deans, A. (2012). On dorsal prothoracic appendages in treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) and the nature of morphological evidence. PLoS ONE, 7, e30137.
Minelli, A. (2003). The development of animal form: Ontogeny, morphology, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minelli, A. (2010). Evolutionary developmental biology does not offer a significant challenge to the neo-Darwinian paradigm. In F. J. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 213–226). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Minelli, A., Brena, C., Deflorian, G., Maruzzo, D., & Fusco, G. (2006). From embryo to adult-beyond the conventional periodization of arthropod development. Development Genes and Evolution, 216, 373–383.
Müller, G. B. (2007). Evo-devo: Extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 943–949.
Müller, G. B., & Newman, S. A. (2005). The innovation triad: An EvoDevo agenda. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 304, 487–503.
Newman, S. A. (1994). Generic physical mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis: A common basis for development and evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 7, 467–488.
Newman, S. A., & Müller, G. B. (2005). Origination and innovation in the vertebrate limb skeleton: An epigenetic perspective. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 304, 593–609.
Newman, S. A., Forgacs, G., & Müller, G. B. (2006). Before programs: The physical origination of multicellular forms. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 50, 289–299.
Niklas, K. J. (2009). Deducing plant function from organic form: Challenges and pitfalls. In M. D. Laubichler & J. Maienschein (Eds.), Form and function in developmental evolution (pp. 47–82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, A. R. (2012). Developmental plasticity and the origin of novel forms: Unveiling cryptic genetic variation via “use and disuse”. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 318, 466–479.
Pavlicev, M., Norgard, E., Fawcett, G., & Cheverud, J. (2011). Evolution of pleiotropy: Epistatic interaction pattern supports a mechanistic model underlying variation in genotype-phenotype map. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 316, 371–385.
Pigliucci, M. (2007). Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution, 61, 2743–2749.
Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. B. (Eds.). (2010). Evolution—The extended synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Posnien, N., Koniszewski, N., Hein, H., & Bucher, G. (2011). Candidate gene screen in the red flour beetle Tribolium reveals Six3 as ancient regulator of anterior median head and central complex development. PLoS Genetics, 7, e1002416.
Prud’homme, B., Minervino, C., Hocine, M., Cande, J. D., Aouane, A., Dufour, H. D., Kassner, V. A., & Gompel, N. (2011). Body plan innovation in treehoppers through the evolution of an extra wing-like appendage. Nature, 473, 83–86.
Raff, R. A. (2000). Evo-Devo: The evolution of a new discipline. Nature Reviews Genetics, 1, 74–79.
Raff, R. A. (2007). Written in stone: Fossils, genes, and evo-devo. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 911–920.
Raff, R. A. (2008). Origins of the other metazoan body plans: The evolution of larval forms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 363, 1473–1479.
Raff, E. C., Popodi, E. M., Kauffman, J. S., Sly, B. J., Turner, F. R., Morris, V. B., & Raff, R. A. (2003). Regulatory punctuated equilibrium and convergence in the evolution of developmental pathways in direct-developing sea urchins. Evolution & Development, 5, 478–493.
Rosenberg, A., & Neander, K. (2009). Are homologies (selected effect or causal role) function free? Philosophy of Science, 76, 307–334.
Salazar-Ciudad, I. (2006). Developmental constraints vs. variational properties: How pattern formation can help to understand evolution and development. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 306, 107–125.
Salazar-Ciudad, I., Newman, S. A., & Solé, R. V. (2001a). Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks I. Emergence of patterns and genotype-phenotype relationships. Evolution & Development, 3, 84–94.
Salazar-Ciudad, I., Solé, R. V., & Newman, S. A. (2001b). Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks II. Application to the evolution of segmentation mechanisms. Evolution & Development, 3, 95–103.
Salinas-Saavedra, M., & Vargas, A. O. (2011). Cortical cytasters: A highly conserved developmental trait of Bilateria with similarities to Ctenophora. EvoDevo, 2, 23.
Salthe, S. N. (1985). Evolving hierarchical systems: Their structure and representation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schwenk, K., & Wagner, G. P. (2003). Constraint. In B. K. Hall & W. M. Olson (Eds.), Keywords and concepts in evolutionary developmental biology (pp. 52–61). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shubin, N., Tabin, C., & Carroll, S. (2009). Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature, 457, 818–823.
Slack, J. M. W. (2006). Essential developmental biology (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Sommer, R. J. (2009). The future of evo-devo: Model systems and evolutionary theory. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 416–422.
Stearns, S. C. (1992). The evolution of life histories. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sterelny, K. (2000). Development, evolution, and adaptation. Philosophy of Science, 67, S369–S387.
Sterelny, K. (2007). What is evolvability? In M. Matthen & C. Stephens (Eds.), Philosophy of biology (Handbook of philosophy of science, pp. 163–178). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
Stern, D. L. (2011). Evolution, development, and the predictable genome. Greenwood Village: Roberts and Company Publishers.
Telford, M. J., & Budd, G. E. (2003). The place of phylogeny and cladistics in Evo-devo research. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47, 479–490.
Wagner, G. P. (2000). What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part I: Why is developmental biology necessary to explain evolutionary innovations? Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 288, 95–98.
Wagner, G. P. (2001). What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part II: A causal explanation of evolutionary innovations may be impossible. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 305–309.
Wagner, A. (2005). Robustness and evolvability in living systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wagner, G. P. (2005). The developmental evolution of avian digit homology: An update. Theory in Biosciences, 124, 165–183.
Wagner, G. P. (2007). The developmental genetics of homology. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 473–479.
Wagner, A. (2011). The origins of evolutionary innovations: A theory of transformative change in living systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wagner, G. P., & Lynch, V. J. (2010). Evolutionary novelties. Current Biology, 20, R48–R52.
Wagner, G. P., & Mezey, J. G. (2004). The role of genetic architecture constraints in the origin of variational modularity. In G. Schlosser & G. P. Wagner (Eds.), Modularity in development and evolution (pp. 338–358). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wagner, G. P., & Misof, B. Y. (1993). How can a character be developmentally constrained despite variation in developmental pathways? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 6, 449–455.
Wagner, G., & Zhang, J. (2011). The pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map: The evolvability of complex organisms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 204–213.
Wagner, G. P., Chiu, C.-H., & Laubichler, M. (2000). Developmental evolution as a mechanistic science: The inference from developmental mechanisms to evolutionary processes. American Zoologist, 40, 819–831.
Wake, D. B. (1991). Homoplasy: The result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations? American Naturalist, 138, 543–567.
Wake, D. B. (2009). What salamanders have taught us about evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 333–352.
Walsh, D. M. (2007). Development: Three grades of ontogenetic involvement. In M. Matthen & C. Stephens (Eds.), Philosophy of biology (Handbook of philosophy of science, pp. 179–199). Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier.
Wang, Z., Young, R., Xue, H., & Wagner, G. (2011). Transcriptomic analysis of avian digits reveals conserved and derived digit identities in birds. Nature, 477, 583–586.
Weisberg, M. (2007). Three kinds of idealization. Journal of Philosophy, 104, 639–659.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1986). Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment and the innate-aquired distinction. In W. Bechtel (Ed.), Integrating scientific disciplines (pp. 185–208). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Wimsatt, W. C., & Schank, J. C. (2004). Generative entrenchment, modularity, and evolvability: When genic selection meets the whole organism. In G. Schlosser & G. P. Wagner (Eds.), Modularity in evolution and development (pp. 359–394). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Winther, R. G. (2001). Varieties of modules: Kinds, levels, origins, and behaviors. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 291, 116–129.
Wittkopp, P. J., & Kalay, G. (2012). Cis-regulatory elements: Molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13, 59–69.
Xu, X., Clark, J. M., Mo, J., Choiniere, J., Forster, C. A., Erickson, G. M., Hone, D. W. E., et al. (2009). A Jurassic ceratosaur from China helps clarify avian digital homologies. Nature, 459, 940–944.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to all of the participants in the graduate seminar on Evolutionary Developmental Biology (University of Minnesota, Fall 2011), where many of these issues were discussed in detail and particular formulations of the philosophical issues were aired (and criticized). Philippe Huneman, Patrick Laine, Molly Paxton, and Jack Powers provided useful feedback on an earlier draft of this essay. This work was supported in part by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation (“Complexity, emergence and reductionism”; ID 24426).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Love, A.C. (2015). Evolutionary Developmental Biology: Philosophical Issues. In: Heams, T., Huneman, P., Lecointre, G., Silberstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9014-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9014-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9013-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9014-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)