Skip to main content

Sustainability Is a Work of Justice: Virtue Not Distribution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Linking Local and Global Sustainability

Abstract

The argument most frequently used to justify the call for sustainability in business and life or society more generally is based on notions of distributive justice. This chapter sees a strong link between sustainability and justice, but in a different way, concerned more with the development and exercise of the virtue of justice by individuals. Sustainability is thus more personal, and is something involving personal effort. It is a work of justice.

Difficulties with the utilitarian and rights approaches to sustainability as just allocation are discussed. Sustainability is seen as a debate about purpose, about what is to be valued, and movement toward sustainability is to be achieved by a work of justice—engaging in that debate both in the local community and between communities, and developing the virtues, including justice, which will facilitate that debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agosto, D. E., Gasson, S., & Atwood, M. (2008). Changing mental models of the IT professions: A theoretical framework. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1953). Nicomachean ethics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (nd). Politics (Trans. Warrington, J.). Publication details not stated: Heron Books Series, published in assoc with JM Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1990). Our common future (Australian ed.). Canberra: World Commission on Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A. (2009). Distributive justice and environmental sustainability. Heythrop Journal, XLI, 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius. (1997). The analects (Trans. Leys, S.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, A. H. (2001). Private thoughts in public spheres: Issues in reflection and reflective practices in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36(4), 512–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and theories of distributive justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2011). Truth, beauty, and goodness reframed: Educating for the virtues in the twenty-first century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI. (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines G3. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. (1961). Introduction to The Republic. In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The collected dialogues of Plato (1st ed., pp. 575–576). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H. (2008). Promoting ethical reflection in the teaching of business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelwood, L. S. (2000). Sustainability as justice: Toward a Christian, ecofeminist ethic of sustainability using the example of sustainable agriculture (PhD). Union Theological Seminary, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1999). Sustainable development as a contested concept. In A. Dobson (Ed.), Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice (pp. 21–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. (2008). The Confucian concept of ren and the feminist ethics of care: A comparative study. In D. A. Bell (Ed.), Confucian political ethics (pp. 175–197). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue (2nd ed.). London: Gerald Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2004). Questions for Confucians. In K.-l. Shun & D. B. Wong (Eds.), Confucian ethics: A comparative study of self, autonomy, and community (pp. 203–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Berhens, W. W. III (1972). The limits to growth: A report to the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. London: Earth Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (2005). The problem of global justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33(2), 113–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosco, P. (2008). Confucian perspectives on civil society and government. In D. A. Bell (Ed.), Confucian political ethics (pp. 20–45). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1993). The nature of rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, O. (2002). Common objects of love. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice (1st ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What’s the right thing to do? London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2004). Why we should preserve the Spotted Owl. London Review of Books, 26(3), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2011). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2012). Consequentialism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/consequentialism/.

  • Slote, M. (2010). Justice as a virtue. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2010 ed., pp. 429–448). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/justice-virtue/.

  • Slote, M. (2011). The impossibility of perfection: Aristotle, feminism, and the complexities of ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A., & Perrini, A. (Eds.). (2011). Business Ethics and Corporate Sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Harris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, H. (2014). Sustainability Is a Work of Justice: Virtue Not Distribution. In: Sandhu, S., McKenzie, S., Harris, H. (eds) Linking Local and Global Sustainability. The International Society of Business, Economics, and Ethics Book Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9008-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics