Skip to main content

Sustainability, Integrity and Judgment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Linking Local and Global Sustainability

Abstract

This paper considers the situation of individuals in corporations whose social responsibilities include sustainable policies and practices. It notes that to enable corporations to fulfil their responsibilities, individuals often have to deal with multiple conflicting ethical demands. In matters of sustainability, these often include matters of difficult judgment, giving attention to new and sometimes unwelcome information. Resolution of conflicting moral demands may be possible through decisions that allow individuals to construct coherent personal narratives, but to do so involves reflection on beliefs and judgments as well as on words and actions. Personal integrity requires consistency amongst all those, even when such consistency requires us to assimilate unpalatable new information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, W. M. (2006). The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century, report of the IUCN renowned thinkers meeting, 29–31 January 2006. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2012.

  • Alleman, J. E., & Mossman, B. T. (1997). Asbestos revisited. Scientific American, 277(1), 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, J. L., Jr. (1997). Defining moments: When managers must choose between right and right. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BHP Billiton. (2012). Working with integrity: Code of business conduct. http://www.bhpbilliton.com/home/aboutus/ourcompany/Pages/codeofbusconduct.aspx. Accessed 7 July 2012.

  • Dawson, D. F. (2004). Report of the special commission of inquiry into the medical research and compensation foundation, NSW Government. http://www.dpc.nsw.gov.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0020/11387/01PartA.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2012.

  • Dower, N. (2011). Climate change and the cosmopolitan responsibility of individuals: Policy vanguards. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), Ethics and global environmental policy (pp. 42–65). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edley, C. F., Jr., & Weiler, P. C. (1993). Asbestos: A multi-billion-dollar crisis. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 30, 383–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P. A. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H. (2008). Promoting ethical reflection in the teaching of business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (1996). An introduction to business ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan-Narasimhan, R., & Lawrence, B. S. (2012). Behavioural integrity: How leader referents and trust matter to workplace outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N. M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G. C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N. S., Kasperson, R. E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore, B. III., O’Riordan, T., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(27 April), 641–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment, 47(3), 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, J. (2011). Individual responsibility and voluntary action on climate change: Activating agency. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), Ethics and global environmental policy (pp. 66–88). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, R. M. (1995). How good people make tough choices. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, J. (2009). How we decide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J., & Briscoe, F. (1997). There’s money in the air: The CFC ban and DuPont’s regulatory strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(5), 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (Eds.). (1996). Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, L., & Lorek, S. (2004). Consumption and the environment in Europe: Trends and futures. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Project No. 904. http://www.mst.dk/Publikationer/Publications/2004/03/87-7614-193-4.htm. Accessed 16 July 2012

  • Mullin, R. P. (2002). What can be learned from DuPont and the Freon ban: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(3), 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and leadership: Clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provis, C. (2011). Individuals, groups and business ethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J., Owens, B. P., & Rubenstein, A. L. (2012). Moral stress: Considering the nature and effects of managerial moral uncertainty. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotary International. (2012). Guiding principles. http://www.rotary.org/en/aboutus/rotaryinternational/guidingprinciples/pages/ridefault.aspx. Accessed 6 July 2012.

  • Simons, T. (2002). ‘Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1997). It’s good business: Ethics and free enterprise for the new millennium. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA. (1975). ‘DDT regulatory history: A brief survey (to 1975). http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/history/topics/ddt/. Accessed 7 Dec 2012.

  • Waters, J. A., & Bird, F. (1987). The moral dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(1), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Provis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Provis, C. (2014). Sustainability, Integrity and Judgment. In: Sandhu, S., McKenzie, S., Harris, H. (eds) Linking Local and Global Sustainability. The International Society of Business, Economics, and Ethics Book Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9008-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics