Brain-Computer Interfaces as an Emerging Assistive Technology (AT): The AT Professionals’ Perspective

  • Evert-Jan HoogerwerfEmail author
  • Lorenzo Desideri
  • Massimiliano Malavasi
  • Matteo Rimondini
  • Mick Donegan
Part of the The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology book series (ELTE, volume 12)


Ever since scientists have started to think about controlling a computer with the human brain, there has been a debate on possible fields of application. Developing applications for people with no or very little muscle control has been an obvious field of attention. BCI technology has thus become a field of interest for Assistive Technology (AT) professionals, who for many years now have been working on enabling solutions for people with disabilities. Nevertheless, BCI research is very specific and so far most experiments have been run in research laboratories by specialized BCI teams. In recent years they have started sharing their knowledge with AT professionals, and experiments outside the lab have led to the first practical applications. In this article we will discuss aspects of this process seen from the point of view of AT professionals. We will explain to the reader who these AT experts are and where they typically work, as well as their aims and methodologies. The final sub-sections deal more specifically with the challenging process of taking BCI technology out of the laboratory and into AT centers and the end user’s own environment.


Assistive Technology Universal Design Mainstream Technology Preliminary Prototype Special Input Modality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. AAATE. 2009. Strategic development. Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe. Accessed 4 Jan 2013.
  2. Batavia, A.I., and G.S. Hammer. 1990. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 27(4): 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Centre for Excellence in Universal Design. 2013. What is Universal Design. Accessed 5 May 2014.
  4. Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demers, L., R. Weiss-Lambrou, and B. Ska. 2002. The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability 14: 101–105.Google Scholar
  6. Donegan, M., P. Majaranta, J.P. Hansen, et al. 2011. Chapter 25: Conclusion and a look to the future. In Gaze interaction and applications of eye tracking: Advances in assistive technologies, ed. P. Majaranta, H. Aoki, M. Donegan, D.W. Hansen, J.P. Hansen, A. Hyrskykari, and K.J. Räihä, 365–376. Hershey: IGI Global.
  7. Federici, S., M.J. Scherer, F. Meloni, M. Corradi, D. Adya, M. Samant, M. Morris, and A. Stella. 2012. Assessing individual functioning and disability. In Assistive technology assessment handbook, 1st ed, ed. S. Federici and M.J. Scherer, 11–24. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fuhrer, M.J., J.W. Jutai, M.J. Scherer, and F. DeRuyter. 2003. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation 25: 1243–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gresswell, A., and E.J. Hoogerwerf. 2007. Guidelines for lifelong learning in assistive technology. Communication, computer access and environmental control. KPT Consortium. AIAS Bologna onlus. Accessed 5 Jan 2013.
  10. Holtz, E., T. Kaufmann, L. Desideri, M. Malavasi, E.J. Hoogerwerf, and A. Kübler. 2013. User centred design in BCI development. In Towards practical brain-computer interfaces, ed. B.Z. Allison, S. Dunne, R. Leeb, J.R. Millán, and A. Nijholt, 155–172. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Hoogerwerf, E.J., A. Lysley, and M. Clarke. 2002. BRIDGE. Assistive technology against social exclusion. BRIDGE Consortium. AIAS Bologna onlus. Accessed 5 Jan 2013.
  12. Hoogerwerf, E.J., S. Mongardi, P. Staiger-Sälzer, and C. Zickler. 2010. BCI research and user involvement: The role of independent AT centres in the TOBI Project. In Proceedings of the AAATE workshop Paper presented at the AAATE workshop 2010: AT Technology Transfer, 33–36. Sheffield 2010.
  13. ISO-9241-210. 2010. Human-centred design for interactive systems. Licensed to Dr. Hoogerwerf, ISO Store order #: 10-1173179/Downloaded: 2010-12-20.Google Scholar
  14. Pullin, G. 2011. Design meets disability. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Scherer, M.J. 1998. Matching person and technology: A series of assessments for evaluating predispositions to and outcomes of technology use in rehabilitation, education, the workplace and other settings. Rev. ed. Webster: Institute for Matching Person and Technology.Google Scholar
  17. Steel, E., G.J. Gelderblom, and L.P. de Witte. 2011. Development of an AT selection tool using the ICF model. Technology and Disability 23: 1–6.Google Scholar
  18. Sudsawad, P. 2007. Knowledge translation: Introduction to models, strategies, and measures. The University of Wisconsin-Madison/The National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research at the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Available at Http:// def. Accessed 15 Dec 2012.
  19. Vanhove, J.M. 2011. Ethical framework for the implementation and use of person centred technology for persons with disabilities. Impact-in-Europe Project. Accessed 29 Dec 2012.
  20. World Health Organization (WHO). 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO. Available via WHO. Accessed 3 Jan 2013.
  21. Zickler, C., A. Riccio, F. Leotta, S. Hillian-Tress, S. Halder, E. Holz, P. Staiger-Sälzer, et al. 2011. A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 42(4): 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lorenzo Desideri
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Malavasi
    • 1
  • Matteo Rimondini
    • 1
  • Mick Donegan
    • 2
  1. 1.AIAS Bologna onlus – Ausilioteca Living LabBolognaItaly
  2. 2.The SpecialEffect CharityCharlburyUK

Personalised recommendations