Abstract
Recent electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies showed the possibility to detect command-specific changes in electroencephalography (EEG) or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals independent of any motor pathway. These techniques could help in the improvement of the diagnosis in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC; often suffering severe motor disabilities), providing motor-independent evidence of command following and even, in some cases, permitting communication. We here review the first results obtained by BCI-like applications in patients with DOC and discuss the challenges facing BCI research. One application which has been rarely thought for BCI is the use of these systems as diagnosis tools. Indeed, a BCI may help to detect signs of consciousness and communication in patients lacking the ability to move or speak. In this chapter, we will present the first applications of BCI approaches to detect signs of consciousness in patients with DOC. We will then highlight the main challenges that will need to be overcome in future research and some clues from studies in healthy controls and patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bardin, J.C., J.J. Fins, et al. 2011. Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury. Brain 134(Pt 3): 769–782.
Bianchi, L., S. Sami, et al. 2010. Which physiological components are more suitable for visual ERP based brain-computer interface? A preliminary MEG/EEG study. Brain Topography 23(2): 180–185.
Birbaumer, N. 1997. Slow cortical potentials: Their origin, meaning, and clinical use. In Brain and behavior past, present, and future, ed. G.J.M. van Boxtel and K. Böcker, 25–39. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Birbaumer, N. 2006. Breaking the silence: Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control. Psychophysiology 43(6): 517–532.
Birbaumer, N., N. Ghanayim, et al. 1999. A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 398(6725): 297–298.
Birbaumer, N., A. Kübler, et al. 2000. The thought translation device (TTD) for completely paralyzed patients. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8(2): 190–193.
Bruno, M.A., S. Majerus, et al. 2012. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. Journal of Neurology 259(6):1087–98.
Chatelle, C., S. Chennu, et al. 2012. Brain-computer interfacing in disorders of consciousness. Brain Injury 26(12):1510–22.
Cruse, D., S. Chennu, et al. 2011. Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state. The Lancet 378(9809): 2088–2094.
Cruse, D., S. Chennu, et al. 2012. The relationship between aetiology and covert cognition in the minimally-conscious state. Neurology 78(11): 816–822.
Cruse, D., S. Chennu, et al. 2013. Response to: Reanalysis of ‘Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: A cohort study’. The Lancet 381(9863): 291–292.
Elbert, T., B. Rockstroh, et al. 1980. Biofeedback of slow cortical potentials. I. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 48(3): 293–301.
Giacino, J., S. Ashwal, et al. 2002. The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58(3): 349–353.
Goldfine, A.M., J.D. Victor, et al. 2011. Determination of awareness in patients with severe brain injury using EEG power spectral analysis. Clinical Neurophysiology 122(11):2157–68.
Goldfine, A.M., J.C. Bardin, et al. 2013. Reanalysis of Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: A cohort study. The Lancet 381(9863): 289–291.
Gray, M., A.H. Kemp, et al. 2003. Cortical neurophysiology of anticipatory anxiety: An investigation utilizing steady state probe topography (SSPT). NeuroImage 20(2): 975–986.
Guger, C., G. Edlinger, et al. 2003. How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 11(2): 145–147.
Guger, C., S. Daban, et al. 2009. How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? Neuroscience Letters 462(1): 94–98.
Halder, S., M. Rea, et al. 2010. An auditory oddball brain-computer interface for binary choices. Clinical Neurophysiology 121(4): 516–523.
Hill, N.J., T.N. Lal, et al. 2006. Classifying EEG and ECoG signals without subject training for fast BCI implementation: Comparison of nonparalyzed and completely paralyzed subjects. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 14(2): 183–186.
Hoffmann, U., J.M. Vesin, et al. 2008. An efficient P300-based brain-computer interface for disabled subjects. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 167(1): 115–125.
Kaufmann, T., E. Hammer, et al. 2011. ERPs contributing to classification in the P300 BCI. In Proceedings of the 5th international brain-computer interface conference. Graz: Graz University of Technology.
Kübler, A., B. Kotchoubey, et al. 1999. The thought translation device: A neurophysiological approach to communication in total motor paralysis. Experimental Brain Research 124(2): 223–232.
Kübler, A., V.K. Mushahwar, et al. 2006. BCI meeting 2005–workshop on clinical issues and applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 14(2): 131–134.
Kübler, A., A. Furdea, et al. 2009. A brain-computer interface controlled auditory event-related potential (p300) spelling system for locked-in patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1157: 90–100.
Laureys, S., G.G. Celesia, et al. 2010. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: A new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Medicine 8: 68.
Lesenfants, D., N. Partoune, et al. 2011. Design of a novel covert SSVEP-based BCI. In Proceedings of the 5th international brain-computer interface conference. Graz: University of Technology Publishing House.
Lule, D., Q. Noirhomme, et al. 2013. Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain-computer interface. Clinical Neurophysiology 124: 101–106.
Monti, M.M., M.R. Coleman, et al. 2009. Executive functions in the absence of behavior: Functional imaging of the minimally conscious state. Progress in Brain Research 177: 249–260.
Monti, M.M., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, et al. 2010. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New England Journal of Medicine 362(7): 579–589.
Nakase-Richardson, R., S.A. Yablon, et al. 2009. Emergence from minimally conscious state: Insights from evaluation of posttraumatic confusion. Neurology 73(14): 1120–1126.
Neuper, C., R. Scherer, et al. 2005. Imagery of motor actions: Differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 25(3): 668–677.
Owen, A.M., M.R. Coleman, et al. 2006. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 313(5792): 1402.
Parini, S., L. Maggi, et al. 2009. A robust and self-paced BCI system based on a four class SSVEP paradigm: Algorithms and protocols for a high-transfer-rate direct brain communication. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 864564 doi:10.1155/2009/864564.
Perlstein, W.M., M.A. Cole, et al. 2003. Steady-state visual evoked potentials reveal frontally-mediated working memory activity in humans. Neuroscience Letters 342(3): 191–195.
Pfurtscheller, G., and F.H. Lopes da Silva. 1999. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology 110(11): 1842–1857.
Pfurtscheller, G., C. Neuper, et al. 1997. EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 103(6): 642–651.
Pham, M., T. Hinterberger, et al. 2005. An auditory brain-computer interface based on the self-regulation of slow cortical potentials. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 19(3): 206–218.
Plum, F., and J. Posner. 1966. The diagnosis of stupor and coma. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis & Co.
Regan, D. 1966. Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 20(3): 238–248.
Regan, D. 1989. Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. New York: Elsevier.
Schnakers, C., F. Perrin, et al. 2008. Voluntary brain processing in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 71: 1614–1620.
Schnakers, C., F. Perrin, et al. 2009. Detecting consciousness in a total locked-in syndrome: An active event-related paradigm. Neurocase 4: 1–7.
Vialatte, F.B., M. Maurice, et al. 2010. Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives. Progress in Neurobiology 90(4): 418–438.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse and Martin Monti for their collaboration on the patients’ data information. This work was supported by the Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS), European Commission, Mind Science Foundation, James McDonnell Foundation, French Speaking Community Concerted Research Action, Fondation Léon Fredericq, Public Utility Foundation “Université Européenne du Travail” and “Fondazione Europea di Ricerca Biomedica”. This work is supported by the European ICT Programme Projects FP7-247919 DECODER. The text reflects solely the views of its authors. The European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chatelle, C., Laureys, S., Noirhomme, Q. (2014). Brain-Computer Interfaces and Diagnosis. In: Grübler, G., Hildt, E. (eds) Brain-Computer-Interfaces in their ethical, social and cultural contexts. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8996-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8996-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8995-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8996-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)