Advertisement

BCI and a User’s Judgment of Agency

  • Rutger Vlek
  • Jan-Philip van Acken
  • Evine Beursken
  • Linsey Roijendijk
  • Pim HaselagerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology book series (ELTE, volume 12)

Abstract

Performing an action with the assistance of a BCI may affect a user’s judgment of agency, resulting in an illusion of control, or automatism. We analyze this possibility from a theoretical perspective and discuss various factors that might influence a user’s judgment of agency in a BCI context. We present two pilot experiments that illustrate how this theoretical possibility can be investigated experimentally. We examine potential psychological, ethical, and legal implications of mistaken judgments, and potential benefits of the constructive manipulation of a user’s judgment of agency.

References

  1. Beggan, J.K. 1992. On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(2): 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beursken, E. 2012. Transparency in BCI: The effect of the mapping between an imagined movement and the resulting action on a user’s sense of agency. Bachelor thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence. Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. http://www.ru.nl/artificialintelligence/bachelor/voltooide-bachelor/
  3. Blakemore, S.-J., D.M. Wolpert, and C. Frith. 2002. Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blakemore, S.-J., D.A. Oakley, and C.D. Frith. 2003. Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia 41(8): 1058–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Vignemond, F., and P. Fourneret. 2004. The sense of agency: A philosophical and empirical review of the ‘who’ system. Consciousness and Cognition 13: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frith, C.D. 1987. The positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia reflect impairments in the perception and initiation of action. Psychological Medicine 17(3): 631–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frith, C. 2012. Explaining delusions of control: The comparator model 20 years on. Consciousness and Cognition 21: 52–54. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallagher, S. 2000. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher, S. 2012. Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology 30(1): 15–31. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haselager, W.F.G. 2013. Did I do that? Brain-computer interfacing and the sense of agency. Minds and Machines 23(3): 405–418. doi: 10.1007/s11023-012-9298-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lynn, M.T., C.C. Berger, T.A. Riddle, and E. Morsella. 2010. Mind control? Creating illusory intentions through a phony brain-computer interface. Consciousness and Cognition 19: 1007–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moore, J., and P. Haggard. 2008. Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition 17: 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nijboer, F., J. Clausen, B.Z. Allison, and P. Haselager. 2011. The asilomar survey: Stakeholders’ opinions on ethical issues related to brain-computer interfacing. Neuroethics. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6.Google Scholar
  14. Pacherie, E. 2007. The sense of control and the sense of agency. Psyche 13(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
  15. Synofzik, M., G. Vosgerau, and A. Newen. 2008. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 17(1): 219–239. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tamburrini, G. 2009. Brain to computer communication: Ethical perspectives on interaction models. Neuroethics 2(3): 137–149. doi: 10.1007/s12152-009-9040-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thoman, D.B., J.L. Smith, and P.J. Silvia. 2011. The resource replenishment function of interest. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2(6): 592–599. doi: 10.1177/1948550611402521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tice, D.M., R.F. Baumeister, D. Shmueli, and M. Muraven. 2007. Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(3): 379–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsakiris, M., G. Prabhu, and P. Haggard. 2006. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 15: 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. van Acken, J.-P. 2012. Tracking the sense of agency in BCI application. Bachelor thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence. Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. http://www.ru.nl/artificialintelligence/bachelor/voltooide-bachelor/
  21. van Gerven, M., J. Farquhar, R. Schaefer, R. Vlek, J. Geuze, A. Nijholt, N. Ramsey, et al. 2009. The brain-computer interface cycle. Journal of Neural Engineering 6(4): 041001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/041001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wegner, D.M. 2003a. The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wegner, D.M., and T. Wheatley. 1999. Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 54: 480–492. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wegner, D.M., V.A. Fuller, and B. Sparrow. 2003. Clever hands: Uncontrolled intelligence in facilitated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 5–19. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wegner, D.M., B. Sparrow, and L. Winerman. 2004. Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86: 838–848. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rutger Vlek
    • 1
  • Jan-Philip van Acken
    • 2
  • Evine Beursken
    • 2
  • Linsey Roijendijk
    • 1
  • Pim Haselager
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Artificial IntelligenceRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations