Advertisement

Philosophical Reflections on Brain–Computer Interfaces

  • Guglielmo TamburriniEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology book series (ELTE, volume 12)

Abstract

BCI systems are prime examples of the actual and potential changes that novel information and communication technologies are impressing on human–machine interactions, on public debate about the promotion and regulation of technological innovation, and on rational and irrational attitudes towards technological development. This contribution examines the impact that BCI systems are having on these aspects of human life from the distinctive philosophical perspectives of epistemology and scientific method, ethics, philosophy of mind, and philosophical psychology.

Keywords

Minimally Conscious State Phenomenal Consciousness Minimally Conscious State Patient Access Consciousness Irrational Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bauby, J.-D. 1997. Le scaphandre et le papillon. Paris: Éditions Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
  2. Bermudez, I., S. Badia, A. Garcia Morgade, H. Samaha, and P. Verschure. 2013. Using a hybrid brain computer interface and virtual reality system to monitor and promote cortical reorganization through motor activity and motor imagery training. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 21(2): 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birbaumer, N. 2006a. Breaking the silence: Brain-computer interfaces for communication and motor control. Psychophysiology 43: 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birbaumer, N. 2006b. Brain-computer interface research: Coming of age. Clinical Neurophysiology 117: 479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, N. 1995. On a confusion about the function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18: 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brian, A.W. 2009. The nature of technology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clausen, J. 2008. Moving minds: Ethical aspects of neural motor prostheses. Biotechnology Journal 3(12): 1493–1501. doi: 10.1002/biot.200800244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clausen, J. 2009. Man, machine, and in between. Nature 457(7233): 1080–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly, J.J., and R. Sitaram. 2012. BCI therapeutic applications for improving brain function. In Brain-computer interfaces: Principles and practice, ed. J.R. Wolpaw and E.W. Wolpaw, 351–362. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dobkin, B.H. 2007. Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. Journal of Physiology 579: 637–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freud, S. 1964. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, ed. James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  12. Galán, F., M. Nuttin, E. Lew, P.W. Ferrez, G. Vanacker, J. Philips, and J.del.R. Millán. 2008. A brain-actuated wheelchair: Asynchronous and non-invasive brain-computer interfaces for continuous control of robots. Clinical Neurophysiology 119: 2159–2169.Google Scholar
  13. Grosse-Wentrup, M., D. Mattia, and K. Oweiss. 2011. Using brain-computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function. Journal of Neural Engineering 8: 025004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grübler, G. 2011. Beyond the responsibility gap. Discussion note on responsibility and liability in the use of brain-computer interfaces. AI and Society 26: 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haselager, P., R. Vlek, J. Hill, and F. Nijboer. 2009. A note on ethical aspects of BCI. Neural Networks 22: 1352–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holm, S., and C.V. Teck. 2011. Brain-machine interfaces and personal responsibility for action – Maybe not as complicated after all. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4(3), Article 7.Google Scholar
  17. IASP. 1986. Pain terms: A list with definitions and notes on pain. Pain 3(Suppl): 216–221.Google Scholar
  18. Mattia, D., F. Pichiorri, M. Molinari, and R. Rupp. 2012. Brain computer interface for hand motor function restoration and rehabilitation. In Towards practical brain-computer interfaces, ed. B.Z. Allison et al., 131–153. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merkel, R., G. Boer, J. Fegert, T. Galert, D. Hartmann, B. Nuttin, and S. Rosahl. 2007. Intervening in the brain. Changing psyche and society. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Millán, J.del.R., F. Renkens, J. Mouriño, and W. Gerstner. 2004. Brain-actuated interaction. Artificial Intelligence 159: 241–259.Google Scholar
  21. Millán, J.del.R., P.W. Ferrez, and A. Buttfield. 2006. Non-invasive brain-computer interfaces. ESA, European Space Agency Report: ID 05/6402.Google Scholar
  22. Millán, J.del.R., R. Rupp, G.R. Müller-Putz, R. Murray-Smith, C. Giugliemma, M. Tangermann, C. Vidaurre, F. Cincotti, A. Kübler, R. Leeb, C. Neuper, K.-R. Müller, and D. Mattia. 2011. Combining BCI and assistive technologies: State-of-art and challenges. Frontiers in Neuroscience 4: 161–168.Google Scholar
  23. Monti, M.M., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, M.R. Coleman, M. Boly, J.D. Pickard, L. Tshibanda, A.M. Owen, and S. Laureys. 2010. Wilful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New England Journal of Medicine 362: 579–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moran, D. 2010. Evolution of brain-computer interface: Action potentials, local field potentials and electrocorticograms. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 20: 741–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Müller, K.R., M. Tangermann, G. Dornhege, M. Krauledat, G. Curio, and B. Blankertz. 2008. Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From brain-computer interfacing to mental state monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 167: 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nachev, P., and M. Husain. 2007. Comment on “Detecting awareness in the vegetative state”. Science 315: 1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagel, Th. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 83: 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nehmzow, U. 2006. Scientific methods in mobile robotics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Nussbaum, M.C. 2006. Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Owen, A.M., M.R. Coleman, M. Boly, M.H. Davis, S. Laureys, and J.D. Pickard. 2006. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 313: 1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Owen, A.M., N.D. Schiff, and S. Laureys. 2009. The assessment of conscious awareness in the vegetative state. In The neurology of consciousness, ed. S. Laureys and G. Tononi, 163–172. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pichiorri, F., F. De Vico Fallani, F. Cincotti, F. Babiloni, M. Molinari, S.C. Kleih, C. Neuper, A. Kübler, and D. Mattia. 2011. Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface training: The impact on motor cortical responsiveness. Journal of Neural Engineering 8: 025020. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ricoeur, P. 1990. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Edition du Seuil.Google Scholar
  34. Ropper, A.H. 2010. Cogito ergo sum by MRI. New England Journal of Medicine 362: 648–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rothaar, M. 2010. Human dignity and human rights in bioethics: The Kantian approach. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 13: 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Santoro, M., D. Marino, and G. Tamburrini. 2008. Robots interacting with humans. From epistemic risk to responsibility. AI and Society 22: 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scalzone, F., and G. Tamburrini. 2012. Human-robot interaction and psychoanalysis. AI and Society 27: 297–307. doi: 10.1007/s00146-012-0413-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schneider, M.-J., J.J. Fins, and J.R. Wolpaw. 2012. Ethical issues in BCI research. In Brain-computer interfaces: Principles and practice, ed. J.R. Wolpaw and E.W. Wolpaw, 373–383. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Seligman, M.E.P. 1975. Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  40. Shih, J.J., D.J. Krusienski, and J.R. Wolpaw. 2012. Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 87: 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tamburrini, G. 2009. Brain to computer communication: Ethical perspectives on interaction models. Neuroethics 2: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tamburrini, G. 2013. Menschenwürde und Gehirnkommunikation und -steuerung. In Menschenwürde und Medizin. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, ed. J.C. Joerden, E. Hilgendorf, and F. Thiele, 895–904. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt.Google Scholar
  43. Tamburrini, G., and D. Mattia. 2011. Disorders of consciousness and communication: Ethical motivations and communication-enabling attributes of consciousness. Functional Neurology 21: 51–54.Google Scholar
  44. Vapnik, V. 2000. The nature of statistical learning theory, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Várkuti, B., C. Guan, Y. Pan, K.S. Phua, K.K. Ang, C.W. Kuah, K. Chua, B.T. Ang, N. Birbaumer, and R. Sitaram. 2013. Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for BCI and robot-assisted upper-extremity training after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 27: 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vidaurre, C., and B. Blankertz. 2010. Towards a cure for BCI illiteracy. Brain Topography 23: 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vlek, R.J., D. Steines, D. Szibbo, A. Kübler, M.-J. Schneider, P. Haselager, and F. Nijboer. 2012. Ethical issues in brain-computer interface research, development, and dissemination. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 36: 94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolpaw, J.R., and E.W. Wolpaw. 2012. Brain-computer interfaces: Principles and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wolpaw, J.R., N. Birbaumer, D.J. McFarland, G. Purtscheller, and T.M. Vaughan. 2002. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology 113: 767–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e delle Tecnologie dell’InformazioneUniversity of NaplesNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations