Skip to main content

The Net Undercount of Children in the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Techniques in Applied Demography

Part of the book series: Applied Demography Series ((ADS,volume 4))

Abstract

Despite the fact that there has been a persistent and significant net undercount of children in the U.S. Decennial Census for many decades, this problem has received little systematic attention in the demographic literature. This study begins to fill that gap by providing detailed documentation of the net undercount of children in the 2010 Decennial Census based on demographic analysis.

In 2010, there was a net overcount for adults (people age 18 +) of 0.7 %, or 1.7 million people, compared to a net undercount for children (people age 0–17) of 1.7 %, or about 1.3 million people. With a net undercount rate of 4.6 %, young children (age 0–4) have the highest net undercount rate of any age group. Moreover, young Black and young Hispanic children (age 0–4) have higher than average net undercount rates, and these two groups account for about two-thirds of the net undercount of nearly 1 million children under age 5. There was a net overcount of people age 14–17 in the 2010 Census. The net overcount of people age 14–17 is completely accounted for by the high net overcount of Blacks and Hispanics in this age group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. A. (2004). Undercount in China’s 2000 census in comparative perspective. PSC research report, no. 04-565, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. A., & Silver, B. D. (1985). Estimating census undercount from school enrollment data: An application to the Soviet Censuses on 1959 and 1970. Demography, 22(2), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aries, E., Schauman, W. S., Eschbach, K., Sorlie, P. D., & Backlund, E. (2008). The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States, National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics 2(148).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R., Scopilliti, M., Hollman, F., & Armstrong, D. (2010). Plans for producing estimates of net international migration for the 2010 demographic analysis estimates. Census Bureau working paper no. 90. http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0090/twps0090.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2011.

  • Coale, A. J. (1955). The population of the United States in 1950 classified by age, sex and color—a revision of census figures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 16–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daponte, B. O., & Wolfson, L. J. (2003). How many American children are poor? Considering census undercount by comparing census to administrative data. Carnegie Mellon University, February 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, J., Sink, L., DeSalvo, B., & Cortes, R. (2010). The use of vital statistics in the 2010 demographic analysis estimates. Census Bureau working paper no. 88. http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0088/twps0088.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2011.

  • Edmonston, B. (2001). Effects of census undercoverage on analyses of school enrollments: A case study of Portland public schools. U.S. Census Monitoring Board, Report series report no. 05, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodkind, D. (2011). Child underreporting, fertility and sex ratio imbalance in China. Demography, 48, 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, D., & Denton, N. (2001). Decennial Census Affects Children in Poverty, U.S. Decennial Census Monitoring Board, Presidential Members.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., et al. (2011). Births: Final data for 2009. National Vital Statistics System, Vol. 60, No. 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (1999). The overlooked undercount: Children missed in the decennial census. Baltimore: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Accessed 12 Dec 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (2009). Why are young children missed so often in the census. KIDS COUNT working paper, December. http://www.aecf.org/~/media/Pubs/Other/W/WhoAreYoungChildrenMissedSoOftenintheCensus/final%20census%20undercount%20paper.pdf.

  • Ortman, J. M. (2012). Estimating multiple-race births for the 2010 demographic analysis estimates. Paper presented at the Applied Demography Conference, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, J., & Park, J. (2005). The gap between births and decennial census counts of children born in California: Undercount or transnational movement? Paper presented at the Population Association of America Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. O. (1947). A check on the underenumeration in the 1940 census. American Sociological Review, 12, 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G. (2000). Accuracy and coverage evaluation: Demographic analysis results. U.S. Census Bureau, DSSD Census 2000 procedures for operations Memorandum Series B-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G. (2010). Coverage of population in census 2000 based on demographic analysis: The history behind the numbers. Census Bureau working paper no. 91. http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0091/twps0091.pdf.

  • Siegel, J. S., & Zelnik, M. (1966). An evaluation of coverage in the 1960 census of population by techniques of demographic analysis and by composite methods. In Proceedings of the social statistics section of the American Statistical Association (pp. 71–85). Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2004). 2001 census technical report: Coverage. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-394-X. Ottawa, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2010). 2006 census technical report: Coverage. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-567-X Ottawa Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2012). Data snapshot on high poverty communities. Baltimore: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. http://www.aecf.org/Newsroom/NewsReleases/HTML/2012Releases/DataSnapshotHig hPovertyCommunities.aspx. Accessed 5 Dec 2011.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). DA tables released at census bureau’s December 6th, 2010 Conference. http://www.census.gov/coverage_measurement/demographic_analysis/.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). 2010 American Community Survey, Table B 06001. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?ref=top&refresh=t#none. (Available on Factfinder).

  • U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1997). Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity. Statistical Policy Directive 15, Federal Register Notice October 30, 1997. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards. Accessed 12 Dec 2011.

  • Wang, W. (2012). The rise of intermarriage, Pew Social and Demographic Trends, February, 16. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/2197/intermarriage-race-ethnicity-asians-whites-hispanics-Blacks. Accessed 12 Sept 2012.

  • West, K. (2012). Using medicare enrollment file for the DA 2010 estimates. Paper presented at the Applied Demography Conference at The University of Texas at San Antonio, Texas, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, K., & Robinson, J. G. (1999). What do we know about the undercount or children? U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, A. (2006). Inconsistency between accuracy and coverage evaluation revision II and demographic analysis estimates for children 0 to 9 years of age. Paper delivered at the American Statistical Association annual conference, available in conference proceedings, p. 3201. http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2006f.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William P. O’ Hare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’ Hare, W. (2015). The Net Undercount of Children in the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. In: Hoque, M., B. Potter, L. (eds) Emerging Techniques in Applied Demography. Applied Demography Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8990-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics