Skip to main content
  • 1866 Accesses

Abstract

Humanist organisations and individuals have been some of the most vocal critics of both new and existing state-funded ‘faith schools’ in England. This chapter explores the main criticisms of law and practice that have been made of selective admissions, of selective employment criteria, and of the curriculum and examine the source of these criticisms. These sources include human rights discourse, assumptions about the state and society, and humanist philosophies of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Successive government policies have created many different types of schools in England which may be religious. ‘Voluntary aided’ and ‘Voluntary Controlled’ are the two traditional types; added to these in 2002 was a type of school called an ‘Academy’, sponsored by a private organisation such as a church, and outside of local government control. Under the present government, some Academies have been re-branded as ‘Free Schools’, the range of organisations that might set them up increased, and their public accountability further attenuated.

  2. 2.

    Although it is worth observing that even English state-funded schools without a ‘religious character’ are required by law to have a daily act of religious worship.

  3. 3.

     This effect is also held by some to be the main contributor to faith schools’ higher success in exam and test league tables than schools without a religious character. The fact that, although they are higher in league tables, they are lower in value-added tables strongly supports this proposition.

  4. 4.

     E.g. most recently http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/interactive/2012/mar/05/faith-schools-free-school-meals and http://www.schoolsadjudicator.gov.uk/RMS_upload/Annual%20Report%202009-103.pdf and (West et al. 2009).

  5. 5.

     See e.g. Howson (2007) which showed over half of Roman Catholic schools had to re-advertise the post.

  6. 6.

     ‘Academy Schools’, including so-called ‘Free Schools’ are exempt en bloc from teaching the National Curriculum.

  7. 7.

     CRC, Article 2, 2.

  8. 8.

     HRA, First Protocol, Article 2.

  9. 9.

     CRC, Article 3, 1.

  10. 10.

     CRC, Article 13, 1.

  11. 11.

     CRC, Article 29, 1d.

  12. 12.

     HRA, Article 9, 1.

References

  • Benn, M., & Millar, F. (2006). A comprehensive future: Quality and equality for all our children. London: Compass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby, C. (1959). Children who want religion. In M. Knight (Ed.), Religion and your child: A symposium on problems of humanist parents (pp. 11–14). London: Rationalist Press Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackham, H. J. (1968). Humanism. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copson, A. (2006). Humanism and faith schools. In D. Cummins (Ed.), Debating humanism (pp. 75–83). Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. (1999). Humanism: Beliefs and practices. Brighton: Sussex Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1928). The future of an illusion. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawton, H. (1963). Humanist revolution. London: Pemberton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming, J. (1968). Moral education. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), The humanist outlook (pp. 115–127). London: Pemberton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming, J. (1969). Individuality morality. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, J. (2009). Humanism. London: Rationalist Press Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, J. (2007). 22nd survey of senior staff appointments in maintained schools in England and Wales. London: Data Surveys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humanist Philosophers’ Group. (2001). Religious schools: The case against. London: British Humanist Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, M. (1954). Morals without religion and other essays. London: Dennis Dobson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2006). A better way forward. London: British Humanist Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. (Ed.). (2007). The case for secularism: A neutral state in an open society. London: British Humanist Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. N. (1953). Practice of new humanism. Calcutta: Renaissance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1944). On education. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, A., Barham, E., & Hind, A. (2009). Secondary school admissions in England: Policy and practice. London: RISE and LSE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Copson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Copson, A. (2014). ‘Faith Schools’ in England: The Humanist Critique. In: Chapman, J., McNamara, S., Reiss, M., Waghid, Y. (eds) International Handbook of Learning, Teaching and Leading in Faith-Based Schools. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8972-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics