Skip to main content

Video-Surveillance and the Production of Space in Urban Nightlife Districts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsible Innovation 1

Abstract

This chapter is based on a research project that examines if and how technologically mediated forms of surveillance and policing improve the safety and wellbeing of nightlife consumers whilst at the same time also contributing to processes of socio-spatial exclusion of particular groups. By interrogating the triad of surveillance and policing, wellbeing and exclusion in nightlife districts in Dutch city centers we found that the effects of video-surveillance on the production of space are complex and ambiguous. Storylines used by local policy-makers with regard to CCTV differ considerably between cities and tend to overestimate the benefits of CCTV surveillance. Moreover, consumers’ awareness and knowledge of CCTV tends to be limited and only a few experiences a real sense of enhanced safety and wellbeing because of the presence of technology alone. At the same time, the effects of surveillance and policing on the exclusion of certain groups from nightlife districts are not equivocally supported by our initial findings either.

Contribution on the basis of the research project: ‘Surveillance in Urban Nightscapes: The Socio-Spatial Effects of Video-Surveillance in Urban Nightlife Districts’

Grant 313-99-140; Responsible Innovation Programme; Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Dutch word ‘stadsmarinier’ has been invented by a Dutch psychologist, Diekstra, who argued that when policing unsafe areas the City Council should deploy the best people who should be given authority, power and financial support. He made the comparison with the military which also sends its best people to the front.

References

  • Armitage, R. 2002. To CCTV or Not to CCTV? – A review of current research into the effectiveness of CCTV systems in reducing crime. London: Nacro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S., S. Fuller, and J. Painter. 2012. Wellbeing and place. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard-Wills, D. 2011. UK news media discourses of surveillance. The Sociological Quarterly 52: 548–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brands, J., T. Schwanen, and I. van Aalst. 2014. What are you looking at? A visitors’ perspective on CCTV in the night-time economy. European Urban and Regional Research, doi:10.1177/0969776413481369.

  • Chatterton, P., and R. Hollands. 2003. Urban nightscapes: Youth cultures, pleasure spaces and corporate power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conradson, D. 2005. Landscape, care and the relational self: Therapeutic encounters in rural England. Health & Place 11: 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delanda, M. 2006. A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brain Massumi. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. 2009. The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleuret, S., and S. Atkinson. 2007. Wellbeing, health and geography: A critical review and research agenda. New Zealand Geographer 63: 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flight, S., and P. Hulshof. 2010. Roadmap Beeldtechnologie Veiligheidsdomein. Behoefte en Gewenste Innovaties voor ‘Veilig door Innovatie’. Amsterdam: DSP groep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2002. The Archeology of Knowledge. Trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. Abingdon: Routledge Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemeente Groningen. 2011. Evaluatie Agressiedetectie. Groningen: Gemeente Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemeente Utrecht. 2002. Convenant Veilig Uitgaan Binnenstad Utrecht 2002–2006. Utrecht: Gemeente Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S.D.N. 2005. Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography 29(5): 562–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K.D., and R.V. Ericsson. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. 2005. Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: From acid rain to BSE. In Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance, ed. D. Howarth and J. Torfing, 297–315. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T., and P. Hubbard (eds.). 1998. The entrepreneurial city. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 71: 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, G. 2008. Towards safe city centres? Remaking the spaces of an old-industrial city. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, L., and E. Töpfer. 2004. CCTV in Europe; final report. Urbaneye Working Paper no. 15. Berlin: Centre for technology and Society, Technical University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P. 2005. The geographies of ‘going out’: Emotion and embodiment in the evening economy. In Emotional geographies, ed. L. Bondi, M. Smith, and J. Davidson, 117–137. Ashgate: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayne, M., G. Valentine, and S.L. Holloway. 2011. Alcohol, drinking, drunkenness: (Dis)orderly spaces. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, D., and S. Fainstein (eds.). 1999. The tourist city. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauser, F.R. 2007. Difficulties in revitalizing public space by CCTV: Street prostitution surveillance in the Swiss city of Olten. European Urban and Regional Studies 14: 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, H. 2002. Video surveillance, gender, and the safety of public urban space: “Peeping Tom” goes high tech? Urban Geography 23: 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, H. 2003. A two-edged sword – Public attitudes towards video surveillance in Helsinki. In The European group conference paper. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. (ed.). 2003. Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and digital discrimination. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., J. Nolan, and B. Wellman. 2003. Sousveillance: Inventing and using wearable computing devices as data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance & Society 1: 331–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCahill, M. 2002. The surveillance web: The rise of visual surveillance in an English city. Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCahill, M., and C. Norris. 2002. CCTV in Britain. Urbaneye Working Paper no. 3. Berlin: Centre for technology and Society, Technical University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Measham, F., and P. Hadfield. 2009. Everything starts with an ‘E’: Exclusion, ethnicity and elite formation in contemporary English clubland. Addiciones 21: 362–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S., and R. Paddison. 2005. Introduction: The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban Studies 42: 833–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C., and G. Armstrong. 1999. The maximum surveillance society: The rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nouwt, S., B.R. de Vries, and D. Van der Burgt. 2005. Camera surveillance and privacy in the Netherlands. In Reasonable expectations of privacy? Eleven country reports on camera surveillance and workplace privacy, ed. S. Nouwt, B.R. de Vries, and C. Prins, 115–165. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., and A. Eldridge. 2009. Planning the night-time city. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H., W.D. Sahr, and J. Urry (eds.). 2011. Cities and fascination. Beyond the surplus of meaning. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreijenberg, A., J. Koffijberg, and S. Dekkers. 2009. Evaluatie Cameratoezicht op Openbare Plaatsen, Driemeting, Eindrapport. Amsterdam: Regioplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., I. van Aalst, J. Brands, and T. Timan. 2012. Rhythms of the night: Spatiotemporal inequalities in the night-time economy. Environment and Planning A 44(9): 2064–2085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. 2010. Neoliberal subjectivities and the development of the night-time economy in British cities. Geography Compass 4: 893–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, D. 2007. Regulating the night: Race, culture ad exclusion in the making of the night-time economy. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, D., and M. Böse. 2007. Racism, criminalization and the development of night-time economies: Two case studies in London and Manchester. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30: 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timan, T., and N. Oudshoorn. 2012. New technologies of surveillance? How citizens experience the use of mobile cameras in public nightscapes. Surveillance and Society 10(2): 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tops, P. 2007. Regime Veranderingen in Rotterdam. Hoe een Stadsbestuur Zichzelf Opnieuw Uitvond. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Aalst, I., and I. van Liempt. 2011. Uitgaansstad onder spanning. Justitiële Verkenningen 37: 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Aalst, I., and T. Schwanen. 2009. Omstreden nachten; angstgevoelens van jongeren in de uitgaansgebieden van Arnhem en Apeldoorn. In Omstreden Ruimte; over de Organisatie van Spontaniteit en Veiligheid, ed. H. Boutellier, N. Boonstra, and M. Ham, 157–175. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liempt, I., and I. van Aalst. 2012. Urban surveillance the struggle between safe and exciting nightlife districts. Surveillance & Society 9(3): 280–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noije, L., and K. Wittebrood. 2009. Overlast en verloedering ontsleuteld: veronderstelde en werkelijke effecten van veiligheidsbeleid. Den Haag: SCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Schijndel, A., A. Schreijenberg, and G. Homburg. 2010. Evaluatie Cameratoezicht Gemeente Rotterdam. Amsterdam: Regioplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W. 2009. CCTV policy in the UK: Reconsidering the evidence base. Surveillance & Society 6: 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, B.C., and D.P. Farrington. 2003. The effects of closed-circuit television on crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587: 110–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, B.C., and D.P. Farrington. 2009. Making public places safer, surveillance and crime prevention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. 2008. Night spaces: Darkness, deterrioralization and social control. Space and Culture 11: 514–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winlow, S., and S. Hall. 2006. Violent night: Urban leisure and contemporary culture. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina van Aalst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Aalst, I., Schwanen, T., van Liempt, I. (2014). Video-Surveillance and the Production of Space in Urban Nightlife Districts. In: van den Hoven, J., Doorn, N., Swierstra, T., Koops, BJ., Romijn, H. (eds) Responsible Innovation 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics