Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Professional Work and Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of some influential perspectives on the relationships between professional work and professional knowledge. We build upon a number of recent developments in theories of knowledge, skill, expertise, capability and action to help reframe understandings of professional knowledge as culturally and socially situated and materially grounded. We draw on ideas from cognitive ecology and developmental psychology to argue that effective professional action often depends upon tools and resources that come to hand in the workplace – it is the accomplishment of an “extended mind”. We also use recent research on the active nature of perception to argue that professional expertise is often highly dependent on “conceptual perception” and “sensory intelligence”. We suggest that employers and providers of professional education, and quite possibly students themselves, expect too much from the kinds of knowledge that can most readily be acquired in formal education settings: explicit, conceptual and principles-based knowledge. When employers comment negatively on the sharp contrast between the practical capabilities of new graduates and the capabilities of their more experienced workers, part of what they are noticing is – we argue – emergent from, and constitutively entangled with, the workplace setting. A richer understanding of how effective and innovative professional practitioners do what they do is needed, to make progress in the design and evaluation of professional education programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, I., & Kraus, V. (1985). Components of occupational prestige evaluations. Work and Occupations, 12, 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Situating concepts. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 236–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L., Breazeal, C., & Smith, L. (2007). Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing, 8(2), 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (Ed.). (2010). Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Saunders, A., & Wilson, P. (1933). The professions. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers’ classroom images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15, 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C. (2008). Building expertise: Cognitive methods for training and performance improvement (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning to be professionals. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 679–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. (2005). Thinking for a living: How to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Mar, M. (2010, March 29–30). Thinking with the senses in legal playgrounds: A sketch towards multisensory legal education. Paper presented at the BILETA conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Mar, M. (2011). Legal understanding and the affective imagination. In P. Maharg & C. Maughan (Eds.), Affect and legal education: Emotion in learning and teaching the law (pp. 177–193). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S. J., Schunn, C. D., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.). (2005). Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. C. (2005). Legal reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 685–704). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2012). Concept formation in the wild. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1985). Knowledge creation and knowledge use in professional contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 10(2), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2010). Knowledge, working practices and learning. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (pp. 37–58). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2009). Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects’. Organization Studies, 30(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2009). Representing models of practice. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennet, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects (pp. 20–40). Hershey: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, L. (2006). Making knowledge common: Literacy & knowledge at work. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, N. (1974). Schools of the minor professions. Minerva, 12(3), 346–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). The development of epistemic fluency: Learning to think for a living. In A. Brew & J. Sachs (Eds.), Transforming a university: The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice (pp. 57–68). Sydney: University of Sydney Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2009, July 6–9). Teachers’ design knowledge, epistemic fluency and reflections on students’ experiences. In H. Wozniak & S. Bartoluzzi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd HERDSA annual conference: The student experience, Darwin, Australia: HERDSA (pp. 154–162).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Steeples, C. (1998). Creating shareable representations of practice. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 6, 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Zenios, M. (2007). Discussion, collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (1987). Working knowledge: Skill and community in a small shop. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh, J., & Pilnick, A. (2007). Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1395–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). What you should know to survive in knowledge societies: On a semiotic understanding of ‘knowledge’. Semiotica, 157(1/4), 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K., & Morrison, R. (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, A. W., & Murphy, P. K. (2001). Teaching educational psychology to the implicit mind. In B. Torff & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning (pp. 145–186). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (2012). Changing practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (forthcoming). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and working knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization, 12(3), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 107–119). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D. (2011). Teacher professional becoming: A practice-based, actor network theory perspective. In L. Scanlon (Ed.), ‘Becoming’ a professional: An interdisciplinary analysis of professional learning (pp. 219–244). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and changing beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 305–324). Mahwah: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2010). Objectual practice and learning in professional work. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice (pp. 82–103). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N. J. (2012). Engineering concepts: The interplay between concept formation and modeling practices in bioengineering sciences. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 222–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (2004). The knowledge creating company. In H. Takeuchi & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Hitotsubashi on knowledge creation (pp. 29–46). Singapore: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Why do firms differ? The theory of the knowledge creating firm. In K. Ichijo & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Knowledge creation and management: New challenges for managers (pp. 13–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G., Eva, K., Brooks, L., & Hamstra, S. (2006). Expertise in medicine and surgery. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 339–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (1995). Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modelling. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 37–62). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. In D. Shils (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 536–547). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Arocha, J. F., & Zhang, J. (2005). Thinking and reasoning in medicine. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 727–750). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, L. (Ed.). (2011). ‘Becoming’ a professional: An interdisciplinary analysis of professional learning. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (2002). From technical rationality to reflection-in-action. In R. Harrison, F. Reeve, A. Hanson, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Supporting lifelong learning: Perspectives on learning (Vol. 1, pp. 40–61). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review, 25(3–4), 278–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B., & Sheya, A. (2010). Is cognition enough to explain cognitive development? Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 725–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8), 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S., Sinatra, G., & Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 37–54). Pitman: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(4), 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, M. H., & Whalen, J. (Eds.). (2011). Making work visible: Ethnographically grounded case studies of work practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi-Grohn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, D. (2000). Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, R., Bryant, I., & Johnston, R. (1997). Adult education and the postmodern challenge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virkkunen, J., & Ristimäki, P. (2012). Double stimulation in strategic concept formation: An activity-theoretical analysis of business planning in a small technology firm. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (1993). Working knowledge in teaching. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp. 100–123). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Lina Markauskaite & Peter Goodyear

Authors
  1. Lina Markauskaite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Goodyear
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina Markauskaite .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education and Professional Studies, Adult and Vocational Education, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Stephen Billett

  2. Institute of Educational Science, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany

    Christian Harteis

  3. Institute of Educational Science, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Hans Gruber

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Markauskaite, L., Goodyear, P. (2014). Professional Work and Knowledge. In: Billett, S., Harteis, C., Gruber, H. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation