Skip to main content

Introduction: Exploring Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care

Abstract

This book has emerged from our deep and abiding interest in two interrelated questions: How can we further our understandings about early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings as they are experienced by very young children and adults? And, more specifically: What can be gained in this endeavour by bringing together diverse and sometimes seemingly oppositional theoretical and methodological perspectives? We are not alone in these interests. There is now a rich corpus of writing about the lives of infants and toddlers and early years’ practitioners in ECEC settings. Indeed, infant-toddler education and care settings have become increasingly visible and vibrant sites for innovative research, as a growing number of collections illustrate. Moreover, in recent years there has been a groundswell of calls to unsettle the familiar contours of ECEC research and practice landscapes by finding ways to transcend constraining theoretical and methodological divides and dichotomies. Calls to open up thinking in ways that transcend unproductive divides are also beginning to appear in early childhood curriculum frameworks. We recognise the need to relinquish any illusions that bringing together diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives will achieve a consensus view about lived spaces in infant and toddler ECEC settings. Rather, our hope is that this book will provoke conversations about research, practice and policy in ways that will contribute to the lived spaces in infant and toddler settings becoming increasingly pluralist democratic spaces in which different views can be articulated and debated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR]. (2009). Belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/EarlyChildhood/Policy_Agenda/Quality/Documents/A09-057%20EYLF%20Framework%20Report%20WEB.pdf

  • Babich, B., Bergoffen, D., & Glynn, S. (1995). On the idea of continental and postmodern perspectives in the philosophy of science. In B. Babich, D. Bergoffen, & S. Glynn (Eds.), Continental and postmodern perspectives in the philosophy of science (pp. 1–7). Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R., & Wright, H. (1951). One boy’s day: A specimen record of behaviour. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benswanger, E. G. (1979). A contribution to the phenomenology of lived-space in early childhood. In R. Knowles, A. Giorgi, & D. Smith (Eds.), Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 111–121). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthelsen, D., Brownlee, J., & Johansson, E. (Eds.). (2009). Participatory learning in the early years. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, L., & Edwards, S. (2010). Introduction: From challenging to engaging play. In L. Brooker & S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play (pp. 1–10). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos-de-Carvalho, M. I., & Rossetti-Ferreira, M. C. (1993). Importance of spatial arrangements for young children in day care centers. Children’s Environments, 10(1), 19–30. doi:10.2307/41515249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleghorn, A., & Prochner, L. (2012). Looking into early childhood education and development spaces: Visual ethnography’s contribution to thinking about quality. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(2), 276–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datler, W., Datler, M., & Funder, A. (2010). Struggling against a feeling of becoming lost: A young boy’s painful transition to day care. Infant Observation: International Journal of Infant Observation and Its Applications, 13(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Landa, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diack, H. (1962). Boy in a village. Nottingham: Ray Palmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, M. (2011). Play in an adult world: Designing spaces with children. In P. Foley & S. Leverett (Eds.), Children and young people’s spaces: Developing practice (pp. 73–88). Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., Te One, S., & Thomas, M. (2012). Mapping parents’ movements and interaction: Reconceptualizing parent support. In J. Duncan & S. Te One (Eds.), Comparative early childhood education services: International perspectives (pp. 13–31). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, S., & White, E. J. (2013). Philosophy and pedagogy of early childhood. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–12. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.783964.

  • Fenech, M. (2011). An analysis of the conceptualisation of ‘quality’ in early childhood education and care empirical research: Promoting ‘blind spots’ as foci for future research. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12, 102–117. doi:10.2304/ciec.2011.12.2.102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech, M., Sweller, N., & Harrison, L. (2010). Identifying high-quality centre-based childcare using quantitative data-sets: What the numbers do and don’t tell us. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(4), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (2010). A cultural-historical perspective on play: Play as a leading activity across cultural communities. In I. Pramling-Samuelsson & M. Fleer (Eds.), Play and learning in early childhood settings: International perspectives (pp. 5–17). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2007). Psychotherapy of the lived space: A phenomenological and ecological concept. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61(4), 423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, E. (2006). Communication and the semiotics of space. Journal of Creative Communications, 1(2), 173–181. doi:10.1177/097325860600100203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallacher, L. (2005). ‘The terrible twos’: Gaining control in the nursery? Children’s Geographies, 3(2), 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillen, J., Cameron, C. A., Tapanya, S., Pinto, G., Hancock, R., Young, S., & Gamannossi, B. A. (2007). ‘A day in the life’: Advancing a methodology for the cultural study of development and learning in early childhood. Early Child Development and Care, 177(2), 207–218. doi:10.1080/03004430500393763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (2000). Lived spaces, shared spaces, public spaces. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Construction sites: Excavating, race, class and gender among urban youth (pp. 293–303). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulson, K. N., & Symes, C. (Eds.). (2007). Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matters. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, R., & Gillen, J. (2007). Safe places in domestic spaces: Two-year-olds at play in their homes [Article]. Children’s Geographies, 5(4), 337–351. doi:10.1080/14733280701631775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (2006). Infant/toddler environment rating scale (Rev. ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (1979). Children’s experience of place. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E., & White, E. J. (Eds.). (2011). Educational research with our youngest: Voices of infants and toddlers. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, M. (2010). Outdoor affordances in early childhood education and care settings: Adults’ and children’s perspectives. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(1), 152–177. doi:10.7721/chilyoutenvi.20.1.0152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Barko, T. (2012). ‘Answers’, assemblages, and qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(3), 256–265. doi:10.1177/1077800411431562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyttä, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 179–198. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00073-2.

  • Langeveld, M. J. (1983a). The secret place in the life of the child. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 1(2), 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langeveld, M. J. (1983b). The stillness of the secret place. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 1(1), 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, R. L. (1994). Power and emotion in infant-toddler day care. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, A., & Fontaine, A.-M. (1991). The effects of visual boundaries in two-year-olds’ playrooms. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 8(1), 2–16. doi:10.2307/41514764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. (2004). Editorial. Forum, Special Issue: Schools and Space, 46(1), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. Landes, Trans.). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millei, Z., & Cliff, K. (2014). The preschool bathroom: Making ‘problem bodies’ and the limit of the disciplinary regime over children. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(2), 244–262. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.761394.

  • Moore, G. T. (1986). Effects of the spatial definition of behavior settings on children’s behavior: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(3), 205–231. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(86)80023-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (2007). Meeting across the paradigmatic divide. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, R. S. (2007). Reggio Emilia as cultural activity theory in practice. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 5–13. doi:10.1080/00405840709336543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramling-Samuelsson, I., & Fleer, M. (Eds.). (2010). Play and learning in early childhood settings: International perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, E., & Jones, E. (1972). Day care as a child-rearing environment. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, F., & Skattebol, J. (2007). Early childhood activism, minor politics and resuscitating vision: A tentative foray into the use of ‘intersections’ to influence early childhood policy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(3), 180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochner, L., Cleghorn, A., & Green, N. (2008). Space considerations: Materials in the learning environment in three majority world preschool settings. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(3), 189–201. doi:10.1080/09669760802343857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutanen, N. (2012). Socio-spatial practices in a Finnish daycare group for one- to three-year-olds. Early Years, 32(2), 201–214. doi:10.1080/09575146.2011.632364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaṅa, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, E. M. (2008). The child in the world: Embodiment, time and language in early childhood. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (Eds.). (2003). Oxford dictionary of English (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumsion, J., Barnes, S., Cheeseman, S., Harrison, L., Kennedy, A., & Stonehouse, A. (2009). Insider perspectives on developing ‘Belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia’. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2006). Space. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 139–146. doi:10.1177/0263276406063780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1995). Book review: Power and emotion in infant-toddler day care by Robin Leavitt. International Journal of Qualitative Studies In Education, 8(2), 211–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Pavlov, R. (2009). Space in theory: Kristeva, Foucault, Deleuze. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Sumsion .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sumsion, J., Harrison, L.J. (2014). Introduction: Exploring Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care. In: Harrison, L., Sumsion, J. (eds) Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8838-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics