Skip to main content

Abstract

The SYNER-G methodology and tools for the assessment of the systemic vulnerability and performance of harbors are applied in the case of Thessaloniki’s port, a major export and transport harbor of Greece and the European Union’s closest port to the countries of Southeast Europe. Following the methodological framework for the systemic analysis developed in SYNER-G, waterfront structures, cargo handling equipment, power supply system, roadway system and buildings are examined. The systemic vulnerability methodology and software implementation are first described, followed by the description of the system topology and characteristics and the input for the analysis. Characteristic results of the application are provided and commented. Performance Indicators (PIs) are calculated based on the estimated damages and functionality losses of the different components. Apart of the average performance and the Mean Annual Frequency (MAF) of exceedance of the PIs, the distribution of estimated damages and losses for a specific event is also given through thematic maps. The most critical elements for the functionality of the port system are defined through correlation factors to the system PIs. Finally, the epistemic uncertainty related to the use of different fragility functions and functionality definitions is investigated by performing selected sensitivity analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1: 2004. Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A, Yang Z, Parra E, Ragheb A (2001) Cyclic 1D. UCSD

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L, Crowley H, Cotton F, Grünthal G, Pinho R, Valensise G, Akkar S, Arvidsson R, Basili R, Cameelbeeck T, Campos-Costa A, Douglas J, Demircioglu MB, Erdik M, Fonseca J, Glavatovic B, Lindholm C, Makropoulos K, Meletti C, Musson R, Pitilakis K, Sesetyan K, Stromeyer D, Stucchi M, Rovida A (2013) Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE). Online data resource, doi:10.12686/SED-00000001-SHARE

  • Ichii K (2003) Application of performance-based seismic design concept for Caisson-type quay walls. PhD Dissertation, Kyoto University

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K, Yoshimine M (1992) Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes. Soils Found 32(1):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakderi K, Pitilakis K (2010) Seismic analysis and fragility curves of gravity waterfront structures. In: 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics and symposium in Honour of Professor I. M. Idriss, San Diego, CA. Paper no 6.04a

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappos A, Panagopoulos G, Panagiotopoulos C, Penelis G (2006) A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4(4):391–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) (2004) HAZUS-MH: user’s manual and technical manuals. Report prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachakis D, Kiremidjian AS (2005) Estimation of downtime-related revenue losses in Maritime ports due to earthquakes. Blume Center technical report no 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed RB, Cetin KO, Moss RES, Kammerer AM, Wu J, Pestana JM (2003) Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified and consistent frame work. In: 26th annual ASCE Los Angeles geotechnical spring seminar, keynote presentation, H.M.S. Queen Mary, Long Beach, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRMLIFE (2007) Development of a global methodology for the vulnerability assessment and risk management of lifelines, infrastructures and critical facilities. Application to the metropolitan area of Thessaloniki. Research project, General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Liam Finn WD, Harder LF Jr, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Liao SSC, Marcuson WF, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KH (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 127(10):817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalliopi Kakderi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kakderi, K., Selva, J., Pitilakis, K. (2014). Application in the Harbor of Thessaloniki. In: Pitilakis, K., Franchin, P., Khazai, B., Wenzel, H. (eds) SYNER-G: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Complex Urban, Utility, Lifeline Systems and Critical Facilities. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8835-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics