Skip to main content

Measurement-Based Decisions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measurement and Probability

Abstract

Measurement provides objective and reliable support to decision-making [1, 2]. In manufacturing, for example, it is necessary to check workpieces for conformance to their design [3–5]. In mass production, as occurs, for example, in the automotive field, parts are produced independently and then assembled. In order to assemble properly, it is necessary that critical dimensions and forms are kept under control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A numerical example will be provided in Sect.  11.4.

  2. 2.

    Recall in particular Sects. 5.3, 5.6 and 5.7.

  3. 3.

    In this and in the following numerical examples, we mention some of the results that we extensively presented in Ref. [10]. Readers are referred to that paper for probing this subject further. The basic assumptions for this first example are taken from Ref. [11], a well and informative paper that we also recommend to read in full.

  4. 4.

    See Ref. [12] for a discussion of the interpretation of \(e=\hat{x}-x\) as the measurement error, in particular Sect. 3 and footnote 10 in that paper.

  5. 5.

    The gauging ratio is a parameter that relates measurement uncertainty to the characteristics of the production process, here summarised by parameter \(a\). A high gauging factor is typical of an accurate inspection process.

  6. 6.

    In a more appropriate language, this concept should be expressed as “allowable (measurement) uncertainty”. Otherwise, apart from language subtleties, the metrological requirements are stated in a sound way.

  7. 7.

    Note that here the “product” is a measuring device, so the production process is characterised by the measurement “error” of such devices, as detected in the testing process, and the measurement process is that performed by the testing device(s).

  8. 8.

    Remember footnote 4.

References

  1. BIPM: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement—supplement 2: measurement uncertainty and conformance testing: risk analysis (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pendrill, L.R.: Risk assessment and decision-making. In: Berglund, B., Rossi, G.B., Townsend, J., Pendrill, L. (eds.) Measurement with persons, pp. 353–368. Taylor and Francis, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yano, H.: Metrological control: Industrial measurement menagement. Asian Production Organisation (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO: ISO 14253–1: Geometrical Product Specification (GPS)—Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring instruments—Part I: Decision rules for proving conformance or non-conformance with specifications (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pendrill, L.R.: Optimised measurement uncertainty and decision-making when sampling by variables or by attributes. Measurement 39, 829–840 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Estler, W.T.: Measurement as inference: fundamental ideas. Ann. CIRP 48, 1–22 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lira, I.: A Bayesian approach to consumer’s and user’s risk in measurement. Metrologia 36, 397–402 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. IEC: IEC CISPR/A/204/CD: Accounting for measurement uncertainty when determining compliance with a limit (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. CENELEC: CENELEC—Draft prEN 50222: Standard for the evaluation of measurement results taking measurement uncertainty into account (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rossi, G.B., Crenna, F.: A probabilistic approach to measurement-based decisions. Measurement 39, 101–119 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phillips, S.D., Estler, W.T., Levenson, M.S., Eberhart, K.R.: Calculation of measurement uncertainty using prior information. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 103, 625–632 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, M.G., Rossi, G.B., Harris, P.M., Forbes, A.: A probabilistic approach to the analysis of measurement processes. Metrologia 45, 493–502 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. EURACHEM: EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4: Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. EU; Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 31 March 2004 on measuring instruments, Official Journal of the European Union, L 135 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sommer, K.D., Kochsiek, M., Schultz, W.: Error limits and measurement uncertainty in legal metrology. In: Proceedings of the XVI IMEKO World Congress, Vienna, 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crenna, F., Rossi, G.B.: Probabilistic measurement evaluation for the implementation of the measuring instrument directive. Measurement 42, 1522–1531 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Battista Rossi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rossi, G.B. (2014). Measurement-Based Decisions. In: Measurement and Probability. Springer Series in Measurement Science and Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8825-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics