Abstract
In classrooms and lecture halls around the world, motion pictures have proven to be excellent platforms from which to ignite enthusiasm, illustrate clinical signs and symptoms of illness, recount medical history and scientific progress, and enhance understanding of research and medical practices. They provide instruments for highlighting contemporary social issues and society’s perception of health care, disease and medical ethics, as well as to initiate thought-experiments that advance philosophical knowledge. By portraying relationship webs that influence moral behaviours, films are able to turn us inwards, as we experience the cinematic narrative using both the emotive and cognitive parts of our being. By virtue of a visual, aural, and imaginative medium, film draws on our sensitivities and intellect; challenging us to interpretations that promote debates of complex moral issues or bioethical claims. In a sense, film might be viewed as a nexus where art, science, philosophy, behavioural sciences, and medicine join to enable and enrich our understanding. This chapter provides examples of how feature films and their specific scenes can be used to promote reflection on a variety of medical ethics issues, and showcases some of the techniques and hazards of using cinematic storytelling for this purpose.
Keywords
- Motion Picture
- Unwanted Pregnancy
- Borderline Personality Disorder
- Feature Film
- Dissociative Identity Disorder
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In parentheses the year of film’s release is followed by the name of the film’s director.
- 2.
Adrenaline (probably epinephrine), is a stress hormone that stimulates heart rate and accelerates respiration. Such an injection is completely contrary to acceptable practices with well established protocols of physician-assisted death by removal from mechanical ventilation where anxiolytics and sedatives are used to avoid suffering from air hunger.
References
Battlin, M.P., L.P. Francis, J.A. Jacobson, and C.B. Smith. 2009. Pandemic planning: What is ethically justified. In The patient as victim and vector: Ethics and infectious disease, 329–358. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Byrne, P. 2000. The stigma of mental illness and ways of diminishing it. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 6: 65–72.
Clark, S.B. 2004. Medical monsters in classic horror films. In Cultural sutures: Medicine and media, ed. Lester Friedman, 132–133. Durham: Duke University Press.
Custen, George. 1992. Bio/pics: How Hollywood constructed public history. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Isaacs, B. 2006. Film cool: Towards a new film aesthetic. Thesis for degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kael, P. 2011. The age of movies: Selected writings of Pauline Kael, ed. Sanford Swartz. Kindle edition location 15639. Penguin Group, Library of the Americas.
Keller, D. 2012. For video: Make it short, make it punchy and get to the point. http://www.storyguide.net/archives/769. Accessed March 2014.
Latham, S.R. 2011. Reproductive cloning: Multiplicity. In The picture of health: Medical ethics and the movies, ed. H.G. Colt, S. Quadrelli, and L. Friedman, 357–361. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lyall, S. 2007. In Stetson or wig, he’s hard to pin down. New York Times, November 4. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/movies/moviesspecial/04lyal.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&. Accessed March 2014.
Mitry, J. 1990 (Original 1963). Aesthetics and Psychology of the Cinema. Trans. C. King. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Percy, W. 1998. The moviegoer. Location 3475, Kindle edition. Vintage International Press.
Quadrelli, S., H.G. Colt, and G. Semeniuk. 2009. Appreciation of the aesthetic: A new dimension for a medicine and movies program. Family Medicine 41: 316–319.
Shapshay, S. 2009. Introduction. In Bioethics at the movies, ed. Sandra Shapshay, 7–12. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Steinbock, B., J.D. Arras, and A.J. London. 2003. Ethical issues in modern medicine, 6th ed, 35. London: McGraw Hill.
Williams, S. 2011. Justice, autonomy, and transhumanism: Yesterday. In The picture of health: Medical ethics and the movies, ed. H.G. Colt, S. Quadrelli, and L. Friedman, 86–89. New York: Oxford University Press.
Winter, R.O., and B.A. Birnberg. 2009. Million dollar baby: Murder or mercy. Family Medicine 41: 164–166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colt, H. (2014). Movies and Medical Ethics. In: Macneill, P. (eds) Ethics and the Arts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8816-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8816-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8815-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8816-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)