Skip to main content

Politics and Ethics in Applied Theatre: Face-to-Face and Disturbing the Fabric of the Sensible

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and the Arts

Abstract

Politics and ethics in Applied Theatre explores how the problem with instrumentality in applied theatre can find an alternative in an affective turn that draws on the notions of the ‘face’ from Levinas and the ‘distribution of the sensible’ taken from Rancière. The concept of the face is used to suggest that intimate meetings between people, the primary ground of much performance practice, can create an ethical demand on a person that is both specific and general. Where the classic conception of the face suggests that this is a call that cannot be ignored, the chapter argues that through sensory or aesthetic encounter with others, we can become more aware of the demand that it makes. Once felt, we are drawn beyond ourselves in such a way that our autonomy is limited—and this can be an energising source of our commitment to social change.

In order for performance projects to encourage individuals to see the face of the other, the chapter suggests that theatre’s common prejudice towards physiognomy needs to be countered. Rather than seeing the face in order to be edified by the story of suffering it reveals, it should make an ethical demand for our responsibility to that person, and therefore, to all people in a similar situation. Participatory performance processes are, then, understood as part of a wider political project—that does not denigrate performance as preparation for the real work of political change, but values it as a purposeful part of an intervention into our sensible world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The reader is referred to (the previous) Chap. 11 where Zarrilli makes a similar point that, for Levinas, this relationship “is profoundly ‘ethical’ in the sense that it is asymmetrical”.

  2. 2.

    I put the word ‘blind’ in inverted commas to echo the previous quotation but also to indicate disquiet about the use of words associated with disability as negative metaphors.

References

  1. Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Critchley, Simon. 2007. Infinitely demanding: Ethics of commitment, politics of resistance. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2004. Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholson, Helen. 2004. Applied drama: The gift of theatre. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Philpott, Simon. 2005. A controversy of faces: Images from Bali and Abu Ghraib. Journal for Cultural Research 9(3): 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pugliese, Joseph. 2002. Penal asylum: Refugees, ethics, hospitality. Borderlands 1.1: e-journal. http://www.borderlands.net.au/issues/vol1no1.html. Accessed March 2014.

  8. Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics. Trans. G. Rockhill. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rockhill, Gabriel. 2004. Translators introduction. In The politics of aesthetics, ed. Jacques Rancière, 1–6. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taussig, Michael. 1999. Defacement: Public secrecy and the labor of the negative. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson, James. 2003. Applied theatre: Bewilderment and beyond. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson, James. 2005. Digging up stories: Applied theatre, performance and war. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson, James. 1998. Ed. Prison theatre: Perspectives and practices. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson, James. 2009. Performance affects: Applied theatre and the end of effect. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson, James, Jenny Hughes, and Michael Balfour. 2009. Performance in place of war. Chicago/Calcutta: University of Chicago/Seagull Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Whitlock, Gillian. 2005. The skin of the Burqa: Recent life narratives from Afghanistan. Biography 28(1): 54–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Thompson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, J. (2014). Politics and Ethics in Applied Theatre: Face-to-Face and Disturbing the Fabric of the Sensible. In: Macneill, P. (eds) Ethics and the Arts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8816-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics