Advertisement

Subsidiarity and Federalism: A Case Study of the Australian Constitution and Its Interpretation

  • Michelle EvansEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 37)

Abstract

Since the landmark decision of the Australian High Court in the Engineers case, the Australian federation has become increasingly centralised to the extent that Australia has become less than an authentic federation. This paper evaluates whether the principle of subsidiarity, which is a fundamental characteristic of a federal system of government, could be implemented in Australia to restore legislative and financial powers to the Australian states. The chapter suggests specific constitutional and other reforms.

Keywords

Australian federation Federal balance Subsidiarity Government Decentralisation High Court Constitutional reform 

References

  1. Aroney, Nicholas. 2009. The constitution of a federal commonwealth: The making and meaning of the Australian constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aroney, Nicholas. 2011. Reflections on subsidiarity: European lessons for Australia’s federal balance? Federal Law Review 39: 31.Google Scholar
  3. Blackshield, Tony, and George Williams. 2006. Australian constitutional law and theory: Commentary and materials, 4th ed. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bridge, John W. 1996. Subsidiarity as a principle of constitutional law. In XIV International Congress of Comparative Law, Athens 1994, general reports, ed. K.D. Kerameus, 613. Athens: Sakkoulas.Google Scholar
  5. Bridge, John W. 1999. Constitutions, powers and the doctrine of subsidiarity. The Bracton Law Journal 31: 49–57.Google Scholar
  6. Business Council of Australia. 2006. Reshaping Australia’s federation – A new contract for federal–state relations. Melbourne: Business Council of Australia.Google Scholar
  7. Cramp, K.R. 1913. State and federal constitutions of Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
  8. Craven, Greg. 1995. The High Court and the states. Paper presented at the sixth conference of The Samuel Griffith Society, Townhouse Hotel, Carlton, 17–19 November 1995.Google Scholar
  9. Craven, Greg. 1999. The High Court: A study in the abuse of power. University of New South Wales Law Journal 22(1): 216–242.Google Scholar
  10. Craven, Greg. 2004. Conversations with the constitution. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  11. de Q Walker, Geoffrey. 2002. The seven pillars of centralism: Federalism and the Engineers’ case. The Australian Law Journal 76: 678–715.Google Scholar
  12. Dicey, A.V. 1926. Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution, 8th ed. London: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
  13. Elazar, Daniel J. 1991. Exploring federalism. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gallop, Geoff. 2012. The COAG Reform Council: A view from the inside. In Tomorrow’s federation: Reforming Australian government, ed. Paul Kildea, Andrew Lynch, and George Williams, 43–52. Annandale: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  15. Halberstam, Daniel. 2009. Federal powers and the principle of subsidiarity. In Global perspectives on constitutional law, ed. Vikram David Amar and Mark V. Tushnet, 34–47. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hunnings (ed.). 1998. Encyclopaedia of European law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
  17. Irving, Helen (ed.). 1999. The centenary companion to Australian federation. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. La Nauze, J.A. 1972. The making of the Australian constitution. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lijphart, Arend. 1985. Non-majoritarian democracy: A comparison of federal and consociational themes. Publius 15(2): 3–15.Google Scholar
  20. Longo, Michael. 1999. Subsidiarity and local environmental governance: A comparative and reform perspective. University of Tasmania Law Review 18: 225–246.Google Scholar
  21. Moens, Gabriel A., and John Trone. 2007. Lumb and Moens’ the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia annotated, 7th ed. Netherlands: LexisNexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
  22. Montgomery, John Warwick. 2002. Subsidiarity as a jurisprudential and canonical theory. Law and Justice: The Christian Law Review 148: 46–53.Google Scholar
  23. Murray, Sarah. 2012. State initiation of Section 128 Referenda. In Tomorrow’s federation: Reforming Australian government, ed. Paul Kildea, Andrew Lynch, and George Williams, 332–349. Annandale: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  24. Norris, R. 1981. Deakin, Alfred (1856–1919). Australian dictionary of biography, vol. 8 at http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/deakin-alfred-5927
  25. Productivity Commission. 2005. Productive reform in a federal system. Roundtable proceedings, Canberra, 27–28 October 2005.Google Scholar
  26. Quick, John, and Robert Randolph Garran. 1901, 2002 ed. The annotated constitution of the Australian Commonwealth. Sydney: LexisNexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
  27. Sawer, Geoffrey. 1967. Australian federalism in the courts. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sawer, Geoffrey. 1975. The Australian Constitution. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  29. Turner, Henry Giles. 1911. The first decade of the Australian commonwealth: A chronicle of contemporary politics 1901–1910. Melbourne: Heritage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Twomey, Anne, and Glen Withers. 2007. Federalist paper 1 Australia’s federal future: A report for the Council for the Australian Federation. Melbourne: Council for the Australian Federation.Google Scholar
  31. Vause, W. Gary. 1995. The subsidiarity principle in European Union law – American federalism compared. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 27: 61–82.Google Scholar
  32. Wanna, John., et al. 2009. Common cause: Strengthening Australia’s Cooperative Federalism: Final report to the Council for the Australian Federation. Adelaide: Council for the Australian Federation.Google Scholar
  33. Warren, Neil. 2006. Benchmarking Australia’s intergovernmental fiscal arrangements: Final report. Sydney: New South Wales Government.Google Scholar
  34. Whitlam, E.G. 1983. The cost of federalism. In Australian federalism: Future tense, ed. Allan Patience and Jeffrey Scotts, 28. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Williams, John. 2003. The emergence of the commonwealth constitution. In Australian constitutional landmarks, ed. H.P. Lee and George Winterton, 1–33. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zimmermann, Augusto, and Lorraine Finlay. 2010. Submission to the Select Committee on the Reform of the Australian Federation, 19 August 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin University Law SchoolPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations