Skip to main content

Access to Higher Education for Socio-economically Marginalised Groups: Indicators at Micro-Meso Levels

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lifelong Learning Book Series ((LLLB,volume 21))

Abstract

Some national reports highlight how particular third-level educational institutions place access central to their ethos, strategies and structures. Institutional strategies must also encompass change to the institutional culture itself through proactive outreach and dynamic ‘inreach’ for socio-economically excluded groups. In reconciling a balance between giving increased force to the imperative of widening access to education for marginalised groups, on the one hand, and university autonomy, on the other hand, the discourse tends to focus on incentives for institutions to improve access. It cannot be assumed that institutions are willing or aware of the need to develop outreach targeting underrepresented groups.

Some of the interviewees’ accounts across different countries recognise the limitations of an informational approach that is neither interpersonal nor tailored to the needs and experiences of the traditionally marginalised groups. More imaginative outreach approaches are discussed. A number of examples are highlighted of universities making their campus facilities available to marginalised groups in the evening and summertime to help break down cultural barriers, though across national reports there is little evidence of national level leadership to progress this issue. Some attitudinal resistance towards opening access to the university building is manifested through an argument for institutional autonomy. Yet these institutions usually receive state funding and many are in state ownership; incentives could be provided to facilitate such opening of access, including through performance agreements with Education Ministries. An emerging dimension to good practice in some national reports is university communication with community leaders. A logical expansion of a systems theory approach emphasising the need to foster transition between subsystems is the need for formal links between universities and NGOs representing marginalised groups. A comprehensive access strategy, which tackles deeply ingrained cultural barriers to participation in third-level education and education generally, requires engagement with cohorts of younger learners, even in primary school classes. With the exceptions of Scotland, Norway and Ireland, there is no evidence that this important structural strategic feature is taking place or planned to take place, based on the national reports. A range of preparatory admission courses are observed in a number of reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Similarly in social psychology and in postmodern psychology, Gergen’s (1994) emphasis on clarifying the communicative goals of argument is also to some degree a contextualising of the abstract audience:

    ‘Is argument being carried out so as to sharpen and elaborate opposing positions, yield victory to one side or another, locate areas of compromise, entertain, develop public support, or for other purposes?…by articulating the relational goals, interlocutors may wish to open alternatives to traditional practices of contentiousness’. (p. 63)

  2. 2.

    Hegel (1830–1831) continues with regard to Rome: ‘For Personality constitutes the fundamental condition of legal Right: it appears chiefly in the category of Property, but it is indifferent to the concrete characteristics of the living spirit with whom individuality is concerned’ (p. 279).

  3. 3.

    He refers to the Roma (Balogh et al. 2010).

References

  • Balogh, A., Józan, A., Szöllősi, A., & Róbert, P. (2010). The institutional aspects of adult education in Hungary. Budapest: TARKI Social Research Centre. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1987). The generalized and the concrete other. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp. 77–96). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botelho, A., Costa Pinto, L., Portela, M., & Silva, A. (2001). The determinants of success in university entrance (Working Papers, No 13). Braga: Núcleo de Investigaçãoem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyadjieva, P., Milenkova, V., Gornev, G., Petkova, K., & Nenkova, D. (2010). The role of Bulgarian educational institutions for the promotion of access of adults to formal education. Sofia: Institute of Sociology. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1992). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S., & Amsterdam, A. (2000). Minding the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, J., & Downes, P. (with Byrne, I.). (2009). Is there more than what’s the score? Exploring needs and skills checking for literacy as part of a holistic initial assessment process in a lifelong learning society. Dublin: Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Staff Working Document. {SEC(2006) 1096}. Accompanying document to the communication to the Commission {COM (2006) 481 final}. Efficiency and equity in European education and training systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Staff Working Document. {SEC(2009)1616}. Progress towards the Lisbon objectives in education and training. Indicators and benchmarks 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Staff Working Paper. {SEC (2010)}. Reducing early school leaving. Accompanying document to the Proposal for a Council Recommendation on policies to reduce early school leaving.

    Google Scholar 

  • Communication from the Commission. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research, innovation. COM(2006) 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Conclusions on investing in education and training – A response to Rethinking Education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes and the 2013 Annual Growth Survey (15 February 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the 21st century. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1981). Deconstruction and the other. In R. Kearney (Ed.), States of mind: Dialogues with contemporary thinkers in the European mind. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, C., Downes, P., Maunsell, C., & McLoughlin, V. (2010). Promoting social inclusion: The access of adults to formal and non-formal education in Ireland. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, P. (2004a). Psychological support services for Ballyfermot: Present and future. Commissioned research report. Ballyfermot, Dublin: URBAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, P. (2004b). Voices of children: St. Raphael’s Primary School, Ballyfermot. Commissioned research report. Ballyfermot, Dublin: URBAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, P. (2009). Prevention of bullying at a systemic level in schools: Movement from cognitive and spatial narratives of diametric opposition to concentric relation. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of school bullying: An international perspective (pp. 517–533). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, P. (2011). Community based lifelong learning centres: Developing a European strategy informed by international evidence and research. Research paper for European Commission, NESET (Network of Experts on Social Aspects of Education and Training).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, P., & Gilligan, A. L. (2007). Beyond disadvantage: Some conclusions. In P. Downes & A. L. Gilligan (Eds.), Beyond educational disadvantage (pp. 463–491). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, P., & Maunsell, C. (2007). Count us in: Tackling early school leaving in South West Inner City Dublin. An integrated response. Dublin: South Inner City Community Development Association (SICCDA) & South Inner City Drugs Task Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, P., Maunsell, C., & Ivers, J. (2006). A holistic approach to early school leaving and school retention in Blanchardstown current issues and future steps for services and schools. Dublin: Blanchardstown Area Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, G. (2011, February 8). Respondent to presentation. Maunsell, C., & Downes, P. (2011). LLL2010 Subproject 5. Lifelong learning for all? Policies and practices towards underrepresented and socially excluded groups. LLL2010 conference do three sides always make a triangle? Policy, institutions and learners in lifelong formal learning. University of Leuven, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Disadvantage Committee. (2005). Moving beyond educational disadvantage 2002–2005. Dublin: DES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, L., Holford, J., & Mleczko, A. (2010). The access of adults to formal and non-formal adult education. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1994). The limits of pure critique. In H. W. Simons & M. Billig (Eds.), After postmodernism: Reconstructing ideology critique. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1990). Preface. In C. Gilligan, N. P. Lyons, & T. J. Hanmer (Eds.), Making connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S. (2003). Psychological development of girls and women: Rethinking change in time. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures (F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1830/1831). The philosophy of history. New York: Dover Publications (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and time (J. MacQuarrie & E. Robinson, Trans., 1962). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Authority Ireland. (2010). A study of progression in Irish Higher Education. Dublin: HEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivančič, A., Mohorčič Špolar, V. A., & Radovan, M. (2010). The case of Slovenia. Access of adults to formal and non-formal education – Policies and priorities. Ljubljana: Slovenian Institute for Adult Education. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivers, J., & Downes, P. (2012). A phenomenological reinterpretation of Horner’s fear of success in terms of social class. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalisation, lifelong learning and the learning society: Sociological perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlovskiy, V., Khokhlova, A., & Veits, M. (2010). The role of Russian educational institutions in the promotion of access for adults to formal education. St Petersburg: Department of Sociology, Saint Petersburg State University. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. T., & Miller, P. W. (2005). Participation in higher education: Equity and access? The Economic Record, 81(253), 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1991). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, E. (1926/1989). The meaning of education. Oklahoma: Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell, C. (2011, February 8). Lifelong learning for all? Policies and practices towards underrepresented and socially excluded groups. Presentation at LLL 2010 conference. Do three sides always make a triangle? Policy, institutions and learners in lifelong formal learning. Brussels: University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (2001). Drug use prevention: Overview of research. Dublin: National Advisory Committee on Drugs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M., & Slowey, M. (2009). Higher education in the broader landscape: Widening the perspective on equity and access in Ireland. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 15(2), 204–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkerrins, D. (2007). The transformational potential of the Home School Community Liaison Scheme. In P. Downes & A. L. Gilligan (Eds.), Beyond educational disadvantage (pp. 133–143). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormston, R., Dobbie, F., Cleghorn, N., & Davidson, A. (2007). National Adult Learning Survey (NALS) 2005: Scotland report. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammel, S., & Gottwald, R. (2010). Social inclusion in formal and non formal adult education: Findings from Austrian institutions and government representatives. Krems: Danube University. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1946). History of western philosophy and its connection with political and social circumstances from the earliest times to the present. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M. (2003). Review: A new class paradigm? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(4), 535–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, N. (2007). Tracing the language of educational disadvantage. In P. Downes & A. L. Gilligan (Eds.), Beyond educational disadvantage (pp. 3–10). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensen, O.-A., Ure, O.-B. (2010). The access of adults to formal and non-formal education in Norway. Oslo: Fafo – Institute for Labour and Social Research. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studley, R. (2003). Inequality, student achievement, and college admissions: A remedy for underrepresentation (No 1001). Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Centre for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taljunaite, M., Labanauskas, L., Terepaite-Butviliene, J., & Blazeviviene, L. (2010). The access of adults to formal and non-formal adult education. Vilnius: Lithuanian Social Research Centre, Social Research Institute. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamm, A., & Saar, E. (2010). LLL2010 Subproject 5 Estonia country report. Tallinn: Institute of International and Social Studies/Department of Social Stratification.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tett, L., Munn, P., Blair, A., Kay, H., Martin, I., Martin, J., & Ranson, S. (2001). Collaboration between schools and community education agencies in tackling social exclusion. Research Papers in Education, 16, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch, L., & Vandenbrouke, A. (2010). The access of adults to formal and non-formal education in Belgium’s Flemish Community Leuven: KatholiekeUniversiteit. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, E., Riddell, S., Purves, R., & Ahlgren, L. (2010). Social inclusion and adult participation in lifelong learning: Officials’, managers’ and teachers’ perspectives. Edinburgh: University of Scotland. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A., & Cumming, J. (2000). The inside story: The reality of developing an assessment instrument. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Downes, P. (2014). Access to Higher Education for Socio-economically Marginalised Groups: Indicators at Micro-Meso Levels. In: Access to Education in Europe. Lifelong Learning Book Series, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8795-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics