Abstract
This paper poses a question on the use of the term “vulnerability.” Is this polysemous word often abused today? Is it an analogical term? Or does it have only one meaning?
The expression “vulnerable groups” is mentioned and used in many fields, often in reference to human rights. It is used particularly in situations of economic marginality, in terms of sexual preference, or most commonly, when referring to women. The term is also used when seeking to protect the terminally ill, subjects of clinical trials, or human embryos. It is, therefore, worth examining the use of this term in different areas. In this paper the author intends to reveal the existence of certain abuses in the use of this term.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Polysemy (from Greek, poli-, many, and σῆμα, meanings) is present when the same word has many meanings.
- 2.
Note that the definition adds an additional component: the notion of damage or harm. It is clear that the expression does not have the sense of “I am vulnerable to winning the lottery,” or “She is vulnerable to being healthy,” etc.
- 3.
Here we mean true human liberation. Man always perceives himself as a contingent being who yearns for the Absolute. Good and Being refer to the same reality. From here is the link between being as perfection and as action.
- 4.
Fragile is defined in many dictionaries as a synonym of weak, inconsistent, slack, feeble, and delicate. Its antonyms are consistent, strong, and solid.
- 5.
The Spanish verb ser indicates to be in a permanent state, while estar means a changeable state. Still there can be many exceptions.
- 6.
- 7.
“The question of corporeality is also decisive in ethical theories in general… Everything changes in ethics, insofar as the person is—based on Kant—considered a free and responsible moral agent… With this perspective, having more freedom, dominating nature, is not only good but is even the ideal of excellence. Derechos de las Mujeres, Normativa, Interpretaciones y Jurisprudencia Internacional. Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores. Oficina en México del Alto Comisionado de las naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos (2006). UNIFEM, p. 220.
References
Aquinas, T. 2010. Summa Theologiae I-II Prologue
Arregui, J. V. 2006. Corporalidad. In Diccionario de Bioética, ed. Vázquez. Monte Carmelo: Burgos.
Bates, I., C. Fenton, and J. Gruber 2004. Vulnerability to malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS infection and disease. Part 1: Determinants operating at individual and household level. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 4 (5).
Barwise, J. K., and J. Perry. 1983. Situations and attitudes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 1994. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beth, E. W. 1961. Semantics of physical theories. In The concept and the role of the model in mathematics and natural and social sciences, ed. Freudentahl. The Netherlands: Reidel.
Beuchot, M. 1992. Introducción a la Filosofía de Santo Tomás de Aquino. Mexico: UNAM.
Burgos, J. M. 2000. El Personalismo. Madrid: Biblioteca palabra.
Ebner, F. 1995. La Palabra y las Realidades Espirituales. Madrid: Carrapos.
Entralgo, L. 1991. Cuerpo y Alma: Estructura Dinámica del Cuerpo Humano. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Feldbaum, H., K. Lee, and P. Patee, et al. 2006. The national security implications of VIH/AIDS. PLoS Medicine 3 (6).
Frich, J., L. Ose, and K. Malterud. 2006. Perceived vulnerability to hearth disease in patients with familiar hypercholesterolemia: A quantitative study. Annals of Family Medicine 4.
Foschiati, A. M. 2007. Vulnerabilidad, Pobreza y Exclusión. Problemas de Gran Impacto en el Nordeste Argentino. Anales de Geografía 27 (2).
Grisez, G. 1977. Dualism and the morality. In Atti del Congresso Internazionale su Settimo Centennario di San Tommaso d’Aquino, 5, ed. L´Agire Morale. Naples: Edizione Domenicane.
Kelly, A., K. Gil, and L. Schamberg. 2003. Brief report: Parental perceptions of child vulnerability in children with chronic illness. Pediatric Psychology 28 (3).
Kierkegard, S. 1944. The concept of anxiety. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Llano, C. 1995. Las Formas Actuales de la Libertad. México: Trillas.
Lobato, O. P. A. 1994. El Ser Personal. Rome: Angelicum Preambulus.
Mahncke, H. W., A. Bronstone, and M. M. Merzenich. 2006. Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: Scientific bases for a novel intervention. Progress in Brain Research 157.
Millán, A. 1985. Fundamentos de Filosofía. Madrid: Rialph.
Nédoncelle, M. 1948. Prosopon et Persona dans l´antiqué Classique. Essai de Bilan Lingüistique. Rev des Sciences 22.
Pérez, M. 2005. Victimización y Vulnerabilidad por Ausencia de Legislación y Otras Medidas en Materia Familiar. Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado 112.
Perrin, E., P. West, and B. Culley March 1989. Is my child normal yet? Correlates of vulnerability. Pediatrics 8 (3).
Prini, P. 1991. Il Corpo che Siamo. Turin: SEI.
Prins, G. 2004. AIDS and global security. International Affairs 80 (5).
Rawls, J. A. 1971. Theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ross, W. D. 1994. The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Salamá, P., A. Fitsum, and L. Talley, et al. 2001. Malnutrition, measles, mortality, and the humanitarian response during a famine in Ethiopia. JAMA 286 (5).
Sánchez-Magallón, S. 2003. El Personalismo Ético de Dietrich Von Hildebrand. Madrid: Rialph.
Schramm, R. 2003. Bioética de la Protección, Vulnerabilidad y Amenaza Desde una Perspectiva Laica. Diálogo Político 20 (1).
Sgreccia, E. 2009. Manual de Bioética. Madrid: B.A.C.
Singer, P. 2002. AIDS and international security. Survival 44 (1).
Singer, P. 1994. Rethinking life and death: The collapse of our traditional ethics. New York: St Martin’s Griffin.
Urdanoz, T. 1991. Historia de la Filosofía IV. Madrid: B.A.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tarasco Michel, M. (2014). Vulnerability: Considerations on the Appropriate Use of the Term in Bioethics. In: Tham, J., Garcia, A., Miranda, G. (eds) Religious Perspectives on Human Vulnerability in Bioethics. Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8736-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8736-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8735-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8736-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)