Skip to main content

The Impact of Global Climate Change and Energy Scarcity on Mississippi Delta Restoration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on the Restoration of the Mississippi Delta

Part of the book series: Estuaries of the World ((EOTW))

Abstract

Global climate change and increasing energy cost and scarcity pose significant threats to ecological and social systems of the coastal zone and to the restoration of the Mississippi delta. In coming decades, these two factors will affect how much land can be built and maintained and dictate how sediment is delivered to the delta plain. In this chapter we review climate and energy issues and discuss their significance for coastal restoration. Climate change will likely lead to accelerated sea-level rise, more intense hurricanes, highly variable flow of the Mississippi River with both more large floods and very low water years. Increasing energy scarcity will likely make energy intensive activities such as building and maintaining levees, and pumping slurried sediments much more costly. It will be necessary to come up with energy-efficient projects that require less fossil energy for operation and maintenance so that performance is not hampered by energy scarcity or cost in the future. This argues for river diversions because once built, they are very efficient to operate. The more delta restoration and river management can depend on natural processes, the more cost-effective (from both economic and energy perspectives) restoration will be. Because of escalating climate change impacts and increases in the cost of energy, time is of the essence in terms of jumpstarting a large-scale sediment-reintroduction restoration program.  This evidence indicates that there will be a window of time in the next one to two decades when climate impacts and energy costs are still moderate. This is the time to put resources into improving existing diversions and building new ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) (2008) Oil and Gas Liquids. 2004 Scenario. (5 March 2009; www.peakoil.net/uhdsg)

  • Berman A, Pittinger LF (2011) U.S. shale gas: less abundance, higher cost. http://www.theoildrum.com/node/8212. Accessed Dec. 2012

  • Berman A (2012a) After the gold rush: a perspective on future U.S. natural gas supply and price. An ASPO USA Webinar April 5 2012. Association for the study of peak oil. www.aspo2012.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/.../Berman_aspo2012.pdf. Accessed Dec. 2012

  • Berman A (2012b) Oil–prone shale plays: expectation & experience. An ASPO USA Webinar May 17 2012. Association for the Study of Peak Oil

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley RW (2002) Global oil and gas depletion: an overview. Energy Policy 30:189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum M, Roberts H (2009) Drowning of the Mississippi Delta due to insufficient sediment supply and global sea-level rise. Nat Geosci 2:488–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (2012) Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act. http://www.boemre.gov/offshore/GOMESARevenueSharing.htm. Accessed Dec. 2012

  • Campbell C, Laherrere J (1998) The end of cheap oil. Sci Am March:78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CJ (2005) Net energy from the extraction of oil and gas in the United States. Energy 30:769–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CJ, Costanza R, Hall CAS, Kaufmann R (1984) Energy and the U.S. economy: a biophysical perspective. Science 225:890–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day JW, Hunter R, Keim R, DeLaune R, Shaffer G, Evers E, Reed D, Brantley C, Kemp P, Day JN, Hunter M (2012) Ecological response of forested wetlands with and without large-scale Mississippi River input: implications for management. Ecological Engineering. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.037

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffeyes KS (2001) Hubbert’s peak—the impending world oil shortage. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 208 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffeyes KS (2005) Beyond oil: the view from Hubbert’s peak. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffeyes KS (2010) When oil peaked. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Agency (2011a) Country analysis brief: China. http://205.254.135.24/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=CH#coal. Accessed Dec. 2012

  • Energy Information Agency (2011b) Review of emerging resources: U.S. shale gas and shale oil plays. ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov/natgas/usshaleplays.pdf. Accessed Dec. 2012

  • Energy Information Agency (2012) Tight oil, Gulf of Mexico deepwater drive projected increases in U.S. crude oil production. Today in energy. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=4910. Accessed Dec. 2012

  • Emanuel K (2005) Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the last 30 years. Nature 436:686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FitzGerald D, Fenster M, Argow B, Buynevich I (2008) Coastal impacts due to sea-level rise. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 36:601–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon N, Hall CAS, Brinker L, (2009) A preliminary investigation of the energy return on energy invested for global oil and gas extraction. Energies 2, 490–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg SB, Landsea CW, Mestas-Nunez AM, Gray WM (2001) The recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity: causes and implications. Science 293:474–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS, Cleveland CJ (1981) Petroleum drilling and production in the United States: yield per effort and net energy analysis. Science 211:576–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall C, Day, J (2009) Revisiting limits to growth after peak oil. American Scientist. May-June. 92:230–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS, Tharakan P, Hallock J, Cleveland C, Jefferson M (2003) Hydrocarbons and the evolution of human culture. Nature 426:318–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallock J, Wu W, Hall C, Jefferson M (2014) Forecasting the limits to the availability and diversity of global conventional oil supply: Validation. Energy. 64:130–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (2009) Causes and consequences of the oil shock 2007–2008. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 15002. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15002. Accessed Dec. 2012

  • Hansen JE, Sato M, Reudy R, Lo K, Lea DW, Medina-Elizade M (2006) Global temperature change. PNAS 103:14288–14293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinberg R (2003) The party’s over—oil, war and the fate of industrial societies. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, 275 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos C, Agudelo P, Webster P, Curry J (2006) Deconvolution of the factors contributing to the increase in global hurricane intensity. Science 312:94–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] (2007) Climate change 2007: the scientific basis, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 944 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann RF, Kauppi H, Mann ML, Stock JH (2011) Reconciling anthropogenic climate change with observed temperature 1998–2008. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 108(29):11,790–11,793. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102467108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr RA (1998) The next oil crisis looms large-and perhaps close. Science 281:1128–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp A, Horton B, Donnelly J, Mann M, Vermeer M, Rahmstorf, S (2011) Climate related se-level variations over the past two millennia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1015619108

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson T, McBride J, Chan J, Emanuel K, Holland G, Landsea C, Held I, Kossin J, Srivastava A, Sugi M (2010) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci 3:157–163. doi:10.1038/NGE0779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolker A, Hameed S (2007) Meteorologicall driven trends in sea level rise. Geophys Res Lett 34: doi:10-1029/2007GL031814

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolker A, Allison M, Hameed S (2011) An evaluation of subsidence rates and sea-level variability in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 38. doi:10.1029/2011GL049458

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J (2009) Reflections On: Our Planet and Its Life, Origins, and Futures. Science. 326:1646–1655

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters CD, Root DH, Attanasi ED (1991) Resource constraints in petroleum production potential. Science 253:146–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovica J, Gomez N, Clark P (2009) The sea-level fingerprint of west Antarctic collapse. Science 323:753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao ZC (2007) Global Climate Projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Avery KB, Tignor M, Miller HL. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY Cambridge: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Min ST, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2010) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritis G (2008) “Oil shale promise”. Oil Gas J (3 Nov). (Pennwell Publishing Company, Tulsa, p 16)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DJ, Hall CAS, (2010) Year in review—EROI or energy return on (energy) invested. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1185, Issue Ecological Economics Reviews:102–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DJ, Hall CAS (2011) Energy return on investment, peak oil, and the end of economic growth. Ecol Econ Rev 1219:52–72

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2009) Ocean heat Content (0–700 m).ncdc.noaa.gov.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2012) U.S. Department of Commerce Earth System Research Laboratory | Physical Sciences Division. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/climateindices/index.html. Accessed Dec. 2012

  • Pall P, Aina T, Stone DA, Stott PA, Nozawa T, Hilberts AGJ, Lohmann D, Allen M (2011) Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470:382–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer W, Harper J, O’Neel S (2008) Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st century sea-level rise. Science 321:1340–1343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmstorf S (2007) A semi-empirical approach to predicting sea-level rise. Science 315:368–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skrebowski, C (2004) Oil fields mega projects 2004. Petroleum Review. January:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson J (2010) Gas to displace coal on road to clean energy. Nature 466:19. doi:10.1038/466019a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Oldenborgh G, te Raa L, Dijkstra H, Philip S (2009) Frequency- or amplitude-dependent effects of the Atlantic meridional overturning on the tropical Pacific Ocean. Ocean Sci 5:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer M, Rahmstorf S (2009) Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:21527–21532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Holland GJ, Curry JA, Chang H-R (2005) Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309:1844

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Day .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Day, J., Moerschbaecher, M. (2014). The Impact of Global Climate Change and Energy Scarcity on Mississippi Delta Restoration. In: Day, J., Kemp, G., Freeman, A., Muth, D. (eds) Perspectives on the Restoration of the Mississippi Delta. Estuaries of the World. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8733-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics