Skip to main content

Basins of Attraction for Generative Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chaos Theory in Politics

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

It has long been known that dynamic systems typically tend towards some state – an “attractor” – into which they finally settle. The introduction of chaos theory has modified our understanding of these attractors: we no longer think of the final “resting state” as necessarily being at rest. In this essay we consider the attractors of social ecologies: the networks of people, technologies and natural resources that makeup our built environments. Following the work of “communitarians” we posit that basins of attraction could be created for social ecologies that foster both environmental sustainability and social justice. We refer to this confluence as “generative justice”; a phrase which references both the “bottom-up”, self-generating source of its adaptive meta stability, as well as its grounding in the ethics of egalitarian political theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is some confusion over the term “fork”. Originally this referred to a new version of the project, but the source code repository Github now uses the term for any pull request, including those adopted.

References

  1. Agyeman, J., & Ogneva-Himmelberger, Y. (2009). Environmental justice and sustainability in the former Soviet Union. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Benkler, Y. (2011). Penguin and the Leviathan: How cooperation triumphs over self interest. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chertow, M. R. (2004). Industrial symbiosis. Encyclopedia of Energy, 3, 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chertow, M. R. (2007). ‘Uncovering’ industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(1), 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chertow, M. R., & Ehrenfeld, J. (2012). Organizing self-organizing systems: Toward a theory of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(1), 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coleman, E. G. (2012). Coding freedom: The ethics and aesthetics of hacking. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeSerio, R. (2003). Chaotic pendulum: The complete attractor. American Journal of Physics, 71(3), 250–257.

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Eglash, R. (1999). African fractals. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Eglash, R. (2013, August). Generative justice versus distributive justice. Paper delivered at the 9th annual engineering, social justice, and peace conference, Rensselaer NY. Online at http://www.ccd.rpi.edu/eglash/papers/generative%20justice2.ppt

  10. Eglash, R. (2014, April). Generative justice: The revolution will be self-organized. Tikkun.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrenfeld, J., & Gertler, N. (1997). Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(1), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frosch, R., & Gallopoulos, N. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(3), 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberger, A. L. (1991). Is the normal heartbeat chaotic or homeostatic? News in Physiological Sciences, 6, 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobsen, N. (2006). Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1–2), 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janssen, M. A. (2007). Coordination in irrigation systems: An analysis of the Lansing-Kremer model of Bali. Agricultural Systems, 93(1–3), 170–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual aid: A factor of evolution. New York: McClure, Phillips & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lansing, J. S., & Kremer, J. N. (1993). Emergent properties of Balinese water temples. American Anthropologist, 95(1), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lansing, J. S., & Miller, J. H. (2005). Cooperation games and ecological feedback: Some insights from Bali. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 328–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matthews, J., & Tan, H. (2011). Progress toward a circular economy in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(3), 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1993). Chaos and the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 5091–5094.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ochea, M. (2013). Evolution of repeated prisoner’s dilemma play under logit dynamics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(12), 2483–2499.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Odenbaugh, J. (2011). Complex ecological systems. In H. Cliff (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems (Handbook of the philosophy of science, Vol. 11). Oxford: North Holland (North Holland is an imprint of Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422.

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Park, H. S., et~al. (2008). Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea – From spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Salleh, A. (1991). Eco-socialism/ecofeminism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 2(1), 129–134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Sneath, D. (1998). State policy and pasture degradation in inner Asia. Science, 281(5380), 1147–1148.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Suzuki, S., & Akiyama, E. (2008). Chaos, oscillation and the evolution of indirect reciprocity in n-person games. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 252(4), 686–693.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. van Berkel, R., et~al. (2009). Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), 1544–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Eglash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eglash, R., Garvey, C. (2014). Basins of Attraction for Generative Justice. In: Banerjee, S., Erçetin, Ş., Tekin, A. (eds) Chaos Theory in Politics. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8691-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8691-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8690-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8691-1

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics