Abstract
Diameter distribution of trees is an important stand attribute that describes stand structure in terms of volume, biomass, value, growth and biodiversity factors. Diameter distribution can be characterized using different approaches such as probability density functions, percentile-based distributions or nearest neighbour applications. We review the research related to airborne laser scanning (ALS)-based predictions of diameter distributions. This includes the above-mentioned plot level approaches, as well as predicting the diameter of individual trees and combinations of different approaches. Although ALS does not directly measure tree diameter, there is a strong statistical relationship between ALS metrics and the characteristics of a diameter distribution. The capability of ALS to reproduce different shapes of diameter distribution is the most notable feature of these applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bailey RL, Dell TR (1973) Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. For Sci 19:97–104
Bailey RL, Abernthy NC, Jones EP (1981) Diameter distributions models for repeatedly thinned slash pine plantations. In: Barnett JP (ed) Proceedings of the 1st Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Atlanta, Georgia
Bollandsås OM, Næsset E (2007) Estimating percentile-based diameter distributions in uneven-aged Norway spruce stands using airborne laser scanner data. Scand J For Res 22:33–47
Borders BE, Souter RA, Bailey RL, Ware KD (1987) Percentile-based distributions characterize forest stand tables. For Sci 33:570–576
Breidenbach J, Gläser C, Schmidt M (2008) Estimation of diameter distributions by means of airborne laser scanner data. Can J For Res 38:1611–1620
Breidenbach J, Næsset E, Lien V, Gobakken T, Solberg S (2010) Prediction of species-specific forest inventory attributes using a nonparametric semi-individual tree crown approach based on fused airborne laser scanning and multispectral data. Remote Sens Environ 114:911–924
Cao QV (2004) Predicting parameters of a Weibull function for modelling diameter distribution. For Sci 50:682–685
Deville J-C, Särndal C-E (1992) Calibration estimators in survey sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 87:376–382
Dubey SD (1967) Some percentile estimators for Weibull parameters. Technometrics 9:119–129
Ene L, Næsset E, Gobakken T (2012) Single tree detection in heterogeneous boreal forests using airborne laser scanning and area-based stem number estimates. Int J Remote Sens 33:5171–5193
Eriksson LO, Sallnäs O (1987) A model for predicting log yield from stand characteristics. Scand J For Res 2:253–261
Gobakken T, Næsset E (2004) Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data. Scand J For Res 19:529–542
Gobakken T, Næsset E (2005) Weibull and percentile models for LIDAR-based estimation of basal area distribution. Scand J For Res 20:490–502
Haara A, Maltamo M, Tokola T (1997) The k-nearest-neighbour method for estimating basal-area diameter distribution. Scand J For Res 12:200–208
Holopainen M, Vastaranta M, Rasinmäki J, Kalliovirta J, Mäkinen A, Haapanen R, Melkas T, Yu X, Hyyppä J (2010) Uncertainty in timber assortment predicted from forest inventory data. Eur J For Res 129:1131–1142
Holte A (1993) Diameter distribution functions for even-aged (Picea abies) stands. Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning, Ås
Hyyppä J, Inkinen M (1999) Detecting and estimating attributes for single trees using laser scanner. Photogramm J Finl 16:27–42
Kalliovirta J, Tokola T (2005) Functions for estimating stem diameter and tree age using tree height, crown width and existing stand data bank information. Silva Fenn 39:227–248
Kangas A, Maltamo M (2000) Calibrating predicted diameter distribution with additional information. For Sci 46:390–396
Lindberg E, Holmgren J, Olofsson K, Wallerman J, Olsson H (2010) Estimation of tree lists from airborne laser scanning by combining single-tree and area-based methods. Int J Remote Sens 31:1175–1192
Maltamo M (1997) Comparing basal area diameter distributions estimated by tree species and for the entire growing stock in a mixed stand. Silva Fenn 31:53–65
Maltamo M, Eerikäinen K, Pitkänen J, Hyyppä J, Vehmas M (2004) Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions. Remote Sens Environ 90:319–330
Maltamo M, Eerikäinen K, Packalén P, Hyyppä J (2006) Estimation of stem volume using laser scanning based canopy height metrics. Forestry 79:217–229
Maltamo M, Suvanto A, Packalén P (2007) Comparison of basal area and stem frequency diameter distribution modelling using airborne laser scanner data and calibration estimation. For Ecol Manage 247:26–34
Maltamo M, Næsset E, Bollandsås OM, Gobakken T, Packalén P (2009a) Non-parametric estimation of diameter distributions by using ALS data. Scand J For Res 24:541–553
Maltamo M, Peuhkurinen J, Malinen J, Vauhkonen J, Packalén P, Tokola T (2009b) Predicting tree attributes and quality characteristics of Scots pine using airborne laser scanning data. Silva Fenn 43:507–521
Maltamo M, Mehtätalo L, Vauhkonen J, Packalén P (2012) Predicting and calibrating tree size and quality attributes by means of airborne laser scanning and field measurements. Can J For Res 42:1896–1907
Mehtätalo L (2006) Eliminating the effect of overlapping crowns from aerial inventory estimates. Can J For Res 36:1649–1660
Mehtätalo L, Maltamo M, Packalén P (2007) Recovering plot-specific diameter distribution and height-diameter curve using ALS based stand characteristics. In: Proceedings of ISPRS workshop laser scanning 2007 and Silvilaser 2007, Finland, September 12–14, 2007. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVI:288–293
Packalén P, Maltamo M (2008) The estimation of species-specific diameter distributions using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs. Can J For Res 38:1750–1760
Packalén P, Pitkänen J, Maltamo M (2008) Comparison of individual tree detection and canopy height distribution approaches: a case study in Finland. In: Proceedings of SilviLaser 2008, 8th international conference on LiDAR applications in forest assessment and inventory. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, 17–19 September 2008
Packalén P, Temesgen H, Maltamo M (2012) Variable selection for nearest neighbor imputation in remote sensing based forest inventory. Can J Remote Sens 38:557–569
Päivinen R (1980) Puiden läpimittajakauman estimointi ja siihen perustuva puustotunnusten laskenta. (On the estimation of stem-diameter distribution and stand characteristics). Folia For 442:1–28 (In Finnish with English summary)
Persson A, Holmgren J, Söderman U (2002) Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:925–932
Peuhkurinen J, Maltamo M, Malinen J (2008) Estimating species-specific diameter distributions and saw log recoveries of boreal forests from airborne laser scanning data and aerial photographs: a distribution-based approach. Silva Fenn 42(4):625–641
Peuhkurinen J, Mehtätalo L, Maltamo M (2011) Comparing individual tree detection and the area-based statistical approach for the retrieval of forest stand characteristics using airborne laser scanning in Scots pine stands. Can J For Res 41:583–598
Poudel KP, Cao QV (2013) Evaluation of methods to predict Weibull parameters for characterizing diameter distributions. For Sci 59:243–252
Reynolds MR Jr, Burk TE, Huang W-C (1988) Goodness-of-fit tests and model selection procedures for diameter distribution models. For Sci 34:373–399
Salas C, Ene L, Gregoire TG, Næsset E, Gobakken T (2010) Modelling tree diameter from airborne laser scanning derived variables: a comparison of spatial statistical models. Remote Sens Environ 114:1277–1285
Siipilehto J (1999) Improving the accuracy of predicted basal-area diameter distribution in advanced stands by determining stem number. Silva Fenn 33:281–301
Temesgen H (2003) Estimating tree-lists from aerial information: a comparison of a parametric and most similar neighbor approaches. Scand J For Res 18:279–288
Tham Å (1988) Structure of mixed Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh. stands in South and Middle Sweden. Scand J For Res 3:355–369
Thomas V, Oliver RD, Lim K, Woods M (2008) Lidar and Weibull modeling of diameter and basal area. For Chron 84(6):866–875
Van Deusen PC (1986) Fitting assumed distributions to horizontal point sample diameters. For Sci 32:146–148
Vauhkonen J, Korpela I, Maltamo M, Tokola T (2010) Imputation of single-tree attributes using airborne laser scanning-based height, intensity, and alpha shape metrics. Remote Sens Environ 114:1263–1276
Villikka M, Maltamo M, Packalén P, Vehmas M, Hyyppä J (2007) Alternatives for predicting tree-level stem volume of Norway spruce using airborne laser scanner data. Photogramm J Finl 20:33–42
Yu X, Hyyppä J, Holopainen M, Vastaranta M (2010) Comparison of area based and individual tree based methods for predicting plot level attributes. Remote Sens 2:1481–1495
Zhang L, Gove JH, Liu C, Leak WB (2001) A finite mixture distribution for modeling the diameter distribution of rotated-sigmoid, uneven-aged stands. Can J For Res 31:1654–1659
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maltamo, M., Gobakken, T. (2014). Predicting Tree Diameter Distributions. In: Maltamo, M., Næsset, E., Vauhkonen, J. (eds) Forestry Applications of Airborne Laser Scanning. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8663-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8663-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8662-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8663-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)