Abstract
Estimating biodiversity in complex habitats, particularly in forests, is still a major challenge for ecologists and conservationists. In ground-breaking work, Robert MacArthur and his colleagues quantified relationships between bird and vertical vegetation diversity, and found that the diversity of vegetation structure strongly influenced bird species diversity. However, they were limited in spatial extent when describing vertical vegetation structure due to the labor-intensive nature of data collection. Current remote sensing techniques, such as LiDAR, can describe ecologically relevant measurements of forest structure across broad extents, and thus, there are increasing efforts to examine relationships between LiDAR-derived data and patterns of animal biodiversity. LiDAR-based data have been utilized for silvicultural assessments for over a decade, but LiDAR use in biodiversity studies is more recent. LiDAR data can assist in the assessment of local animal diversity across taxa, and might assist in larger scale biodiversity assessments in remote and rugged environments. In the following chapter, we first briefly discuss the role of vegetation structure in biodiversity studies, followed by a description of the variables that are most commonly used in biodiversity studies. We then give an overview of biodiversity studies that have utilized LiDAR in forests to date. Although there is a growing body of literature relating LiDAR-derived variables to single species distributions and habitat quality, we focus this chapter solely on studies that address animal species diversity in forested landscapes. We conclude with a discussion of future directions concerning biodiversity assessments in forested systems that might benefit from the use of LiDAR-based data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manage 259:660–684
Bässler C, Müller J, Dziock F, Brandl R (2010) Microclimate and especially resource availability are more important than macroclimate for assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi. J Ecol 98:822–832
Bergen KM, Goetz SJ, Dubayah RO, Henebry GM, Hunsaker CT, Imhoff ML, Nelson RF, Parker GG, Radeloff VC (2009) Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions. J Geophys Res 114:G00E06
Blakely TJ, Didham RK (2010) Disentangling the mechanistic drivers of ecosystem-size effects on species diversity. J Anim Ecol 79:1204–1214
Blanc LA, Walters JR (2008) Cavity-nest webs in a longleaf pine ecosystem. Condor 110:80–92
Böhner J, McCloy KR, Strobl J (2006) SAGA-analysis and modelling applications. Göttinger Geographische Abhandlungen 115:1–130
Brändle M, Brandl R (2001) Species richness of insects and mites on trees: expanding Southwood. J Anim Ecol 70:491–504
Clawges R, Vierling L, Calhoon M, Toomey M (2007) Use of a ground-based scanning lidar for estimation of biophysical properties of western larch (Larix occidentalis). J Remote Sens 28:4331–4344
Clawges R, Vierling K, Vierling L, Rowell E (2008) The use of airborne lidar to assess avian species diversity, density, and occurrence in a pine/aspen forest. Remote Sens Environ 112:2064–2073
Cooke HA, Hannon SJ (2011) Do aggregated harvests with structural retention conserve the cavity web of old upland forest in the boreal plains. For Ecol Manage 261:662–674
Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Haddad NM (1993) Double keystone bird in a keystone species complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90:592–594
Didham RK, Fagan LL (2004) Forest canopies. In: Burley J, Evans J, Youngquist J (eds) Encyclopaedia of forest sciences. Academic Press/Elsevier Science, London, pp 68–80
Eitel JUH, Vierling LA, Long DS (2010) Simultaneous measurements of plant structure and chlorophyll content in broadleaf saplings with a terrestrial laser scanner. Remote Sens Environ 114:2229–2237
Erwin TL (1982) Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. Coleopt Bull 36:74–75
Ferster CJ, Coops NC, Trofymow JA (2009) Aboveground large tree mass estimation in a coastal forest in British Columbia using plot-level metrics and individual tree detection from LiDAR. Can J Remote Sens 35:270–275
Ferster CJ, Trofymow JA, Coops NC, Chen BZ, Black TA, Gougeon FA (2011) Determination of ecosystem carbon-stock distributions in the flux footprint of an eddy-covariance tower in a coastal forest in British Columbia. Can J For Res 41:138–1393
Finch S, Vierling LA, Vierling KT, Hudak AT (2012) A case study using field surveys and LiDAR to quantify aboveground carbon, bird diversity, and tree species richness to prioritize conservation based on multiple ecosystem services. In: Proceedings of SilviLaser 2012 conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 16–19
Flashpoler DJ, Giardina CP, Asner GP, Hart P, Price JT, Lyons CK, Castaneda X (2010) Long-term effects of fragmentation and fragment properties on bird species richness in Hawaiian forests. Biol Conserv 143:280–288
Fleishman E, Mac Nally R (2006) Patterns of spatial autocorrelation of assemblages of birds, floristics, physiognomy, and primary productivity in the central Great Basin, USA. Divers Distrib 12:236–243
Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405(6783):220–227
Gentry DJ, Vierling KT (2008) Reuse of cavities during the breeding and nonbreeding season in old burns in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Am Midl Nat 160:413–429
Goetz S, Steinberg D, Dubayah R, Blair B (2007) Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA. Remote Sens Environ 108:254–263
Gossner MM, Lachat T, Brunet J, Isacsson G, Bouget C, Brustel H, Brandl R, Weisser WW, Müller J (2013) Current “near-to-nature” forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests. Conserv Biol 27:605–614. doi:10.1111/cobi.12023
Grimbacher PS, Stork NE (2009) How do beetle assemblages respond to cyclonic disturbance of fragmented tropical rainforest landscape? Oecologia 161:591–599
Harding D, Carabajal C (2005) ICESat waveform measurements of within-footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure. Geophys Res Lett 32:L21S10
Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community response to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513
Hof C, Araujo MB, Jetz W, Rahbek C (2011a) Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity. Nature 480:516–519
Hof C, Levinsky I, Araujo MB, Rahbek C (2011b) Rethinking species’ ability to cope with climate change. Glob Change Biol 17:2987–2990
Hudak AT, Crookston NL, Evans JS, Hall DE, Falkowski MJ (2008) Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data. Remote Sens Environ 112:2232–2245
Imbeau L, Monkkonen M, Desrochers A (2001) Long-term effects of forestry on birds of the eastern Canadian boreal forests: a comparison with Fennoscandia. Conserv Biol 15:1151–1162
Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386
Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957
Jones CG, Gutierrez JL, Byers JE, Crooks JA, Lambrinos JG, Talley TS (2010) A framework for understanding physical ecosystem engineering by organisms. Oikos 119:1862–1869
Jung K, Kaiser S, Böhm S, Nieschulze J, Kalko EKV (2012) Moving in three dimensions: effects of structural complexity on occurrence and activity of insectivorous bats in managed forest stands. J Appl Ecol 49:523–531
Kim Y, Yang Z, Cohen WB, Pflugmacher D, Lauver CL, Vankat JL (2009) Distinguishing between live and dead standing tree biomass on the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, USA using small-footprint lidar data. Remote Sens Environ 113:2499–2510
Körner C (2007) The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol 22:569–574
Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2008) Testing predictions of beetle community patterns derived empirically using remote sensing. Divers Distrib 14:138–147
Lassau SA, Cassis G, Flemons PKJ, Wilkie L, Hochuli DF (2005a) Using high-resolution multi-spectral imagery to estimate habitat complexity in open-canopy forests: can we predict ant community patterns? Ecography 28:495–504
Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005b) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Divers Distrib 11:73–82
Lefsky M (2010) A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System. Geophys Res Lett 37:L15401
Lefsky M, Harding D, Keller M, Cohen W, Carabajal C (2005) Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat. Geophys Res Lett 32:L22S02
Lesak AA, Radeloff VC, Hawbaker TJ, Pidgeon AM, Gobakken T, Contrucci K (2011) Modeling forest song bird species richness using LiDAR-derived measures of forest structure. Remote Sens Environ 115:2823–2835
Leutner BF, Reineking B, Müller J, Bachmann M, Beierkuhnlein C, Dech S, Wegmann M (2012) Modelling forest α-diversity and floristic composition – on the added value of LiDAR plus hyperspectral remote sensing. Remote Sens 4:2818–2845
Lindo Z, Winchester NN (2008) Scale dependent diversity patterns in arboreal and terrestrial oribatid mite (Acari: Oribatida) communities. Ecography 31:53–60
Lucas KL, Raber GT, Carter GA (2010) Estimating vascular plant species richness of Horn Island, Mississippi using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. J Appl Remote Sens 4:033545
MacArthur RH, MacArthur J (1961) On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598
Martin K, Aitken KEH, Wiebe KL (2004) Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: nest characteristics and niche partitioning. Condor 106:5–19
Martinuzzi S, Vierling LA, Gould WA, Falkowski MJ, Evans JS, Hudak AT, Vierling KT (2009) Mapping snags and understory shrubs for a LiDAR-based assessment of wildlife habitat suitability. Remote Sens Environ 113:2533–2546
McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178:719–739
MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Moning C, Müller J (2008) Environmental key factors and their thresholds for the avifauna of temperate montane forests. For Ecol Manag 256:1198–1208
Müller J, Brandl R (2009) Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing and ground survey in mountainous terrain: the potential of LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages. J Appl Ecol 46:897–905
Müller J, Moning C, Bässler C, Heurich M, Brandl R (2009) Using airborne laser scanning to model potential abundance and assemblages of forest passerines. Basic Appl Ecol 10:671–681
Müller J, Stadler J, Brandl R (2010) Composition versus physiognomy of vegetation as predictors of bird assemblages: the role of lidar. Remote Sens Environ 114:490–495
Müller J, Mehr M, Bässler C, Fenton MB, Hothorn T, Pretzsch H, Klemmt H-J, Brandl R (2012) Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat. Oecologia 169:673–684
Ohlson M, Söderström L, Hörnberg G, Zackrisson O, Hermansson J (1997) Habitat qualities versus long-term continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biol Conserv 81:221–231
Parker GG, Harding DJ, Berger ML (2004) A portable LIDAR system for rapid determination of forest canopy structure. J Appl Ecol 41:755–767
Pausas JG, Verdu M (2010) The jungle of methods for evaluating phenotypic and phylogenetic structure of communities. Bioscience 60(8):614–625
Remm J, Lohmus A (2012) Tree cavities in forests: the broad distribution of a keystone structure for biodiversity. For Ecol Manag 262:579–585
Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
Schaffers AP, Raemakers IP, Sýkora KV, ter Braak CJF (2008) Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition. Ecology 89:782–794
Scherrer D, Schmid S, Körner C (2011) Elevational species shifts in a warmer climate are overestimated when based on weather station data. Int J Biometeorol 55:645–654
Schuldt A, Assmann T (2010) Invertebrate diversity and national responsibility for species conservation across Europe – a multi-taxon approach. Biol Conserv 143:2747–2756
Seavy NE, Viers JH, Wood JK (2009) Riparian bird response to vegetation structure: a multiscale analysis using LiDAR measurements of canopy height. Ecol Appl 19:1848–1857
Sendtner O (1860) Die Vegetations-Verhältnisse des Bayerischen Waldes nach den Grundsätzen der Pflanzengeographie. Literarisch-artistische Anstalt, München, p 505
Siitonen J, Martikainen P (1994) Occurrence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Populus tremula: a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scand J For Res 9:89–95
Simonson WD, Allen HD, Coomes DA (2012) Use of an airborne Lidar system to model plant species composition and diversity of Mediterranean oak forests. Conserv Biol 26:840–850
Ter Braak CJF, Schaffers AP (2004) Co-correspondence analysis: a new ordination method to relate two community compositions. Ecology 85(3):834–846
Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92
Tilman D, Knops J, Weldin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Sieman E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1302
Turner WR, Brandon K, Brooks TM, Costanza R, da Fonseca GAB, Portela R (2007) Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 57:868–873
Unterseher M, Otto P, Morawetz W (2005) Species richness and substrate specificity of lignicolous fungi in the canopy of a temperate, mixed deciduous forest. Mycol Prog 42:117–132
Vierling KT, Vierling LA, Gould WA, Martinuzzi S, Clawges RM (2008) Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Front Ecol Environ 6:90–98
Vierling KT, Bässler C, Brandl B, Vierling LA, Weiß I, Müller I (2011) Spinning a laser web: predicting spider distributions using lidar. Ecol Appl 21:577–588
Vierling LA, Vierling KT, Adam P, Hudak AT (2013) Using satellite and airborne LiDAR to model woodpecker habitat occupancy at the landscape scale. PLoS ONE 8(12):e80988
Vogeler JC, Hudak AT, Vierling LA, Evans J, Green P, Vierling KT (2014) Terrain and vegetation structural influences on local avian species richness in two mixed-conifer forests. Remote Sens Environ (in press)
Wei Y, Krzystek P, Heurich M (2012) Tree species classification and estimation of stem volume and DBH based on single tree extraction by exploiting airborne full-waveform LiDAR data. Remote Sens Environ 123:368–380
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338
Wilson EO (1987) An urgent need to map biodiversity. Scientist 1:11
Wünsche A (2012) Erfassung der lichtökologischen Situation im Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald. Technical University Dresden, Dresden
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Müller, J., Vierling, K. (2014). Assessing Biodiversity by Airborne Laser Scanning. In: Maltamo, M., Næsset, E., Vauhkonen, J. (eds) Forestry Applications of Airborne Laser Scanning. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8663-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8663-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8662-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8663-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)