Advertisement

Adaptation to Seismic Risk and Climate Change: San Francisco and Berkeley, California, USA

  • William SiembiedaEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.6k Downloads
Part of the Environmental Hazards book series (ENHA)

Abstract

This chapter examines the multi-sector resiliency and climate adaptation approaches undertaken by the San Francisco Bay Area cities of Berkeley and San Francisco. The Paton and Johnston disaster resiliency model is used to assess the adaptive capacity of these two cities. Findings show that “partnering” with civic, business and community based organisations (CBO) is a central element for producing sustainable resiliency and lowering disaster risk. San Francisco adopted a Climate Action Plan in 2004, followed by Berkeley in 2009. Both cities use state government-generated data to assess risk and their own funding to lower risk and adapt to climate change. The key lesson uncovered in this analysis is that it matters less which level of government (local, state, federal) provides guidance; rather it matters more that guidance is based on accepted science that can be easily accessed and used by anyone interested in resiliency and climate change adaptation.

Keywords

Resiliency Mitigation planning Social capital Risk reduction Climate change adaptation San Francisco Berkeley 

References

  1. Alesch, D. J., & Siembieda W. (2011). The role of the built environment in the recovery of cities and communities from extreme events. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 30(2), 197–211.Google Scholar
  2. Alrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Applied Technology Council. (2010a). Here today-here tomorrow: The road to earthquake resilience in San Francisco: A community action plan for seismic safety. ATC 52-2 Redwood City.Google Scholar
  4. Applied Technology Council. (2010b). Here today-here tomorrow: The road to earthquake resilience in San Francisco- earthquake safety for soft story buildings. Seismic safety. ATC 52-3. Redwood City.Google Scholar
  5. Association of Bay Area Governments. (2013). Regional resilience initiative: Policy agenda for recovery. Oakland. March.Google Scholar
  6. CNRA (California Natural Resources Agency). (2009). 2009 California climate adaptation strategy. A report to the Governor of the State of California in response to executive order S-13-2008. http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/adaptation/.
  7. Chakos, A., Schultz, P., & Tobin, L. T. (2002). Making it work in Berkeley: Investing in community sustainability. Natural Hazards Review, 3(2), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. City of Berkeley, CA. (2009). Climate action plan.Google Scholar
  9. Cutter, S., Burton, C. B, & Emrich, C. T. (2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(5), Article 51.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Emergency Management (DEM). (2009). The preparedness movement communications strategy. City and County of San Francisco, September.Google Scholar
  11. Eisner, R. (2010). Building disaster resilient organisations in the non-government (NGO) sector.” Journal of Disaster Research, 5(5), 503–508.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, L. A., & Tam, L. (2012). San Francisco. In Edward J. Blakely & Armando Carbonell. Resilient coastal city regions: Planning for climate change in the United States and Australia (Chap. 5, pp. 117–144). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  13. Leonard, H. B., & Howitt, A. M. (2010). Advance recovery and the development of local hazard mitigation plan. City of Berkeley.Google Scholar
  14. Meyer, S., Henry, E., Wright, R. E., & Palmer, C. A. (2010). Post-disaster redevelopment planning: Local capacity building through pre-event planning. Journal of Disaster Research, 5(5), 552–564.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell, J. K. (2010). Changing knowledge about disaster recovery: Bridging gaps between research and action in light of hurricane Katrina and other policy-forcing events. University of Leipzig Presentation, 600th Anniversary.Google Scholar
  16. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum R. L. (Mar 2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychologist, 41(1–2), 127–150. PMID: 18157631 [PubMed—indexed for MEDLINE].Google Scholar
  17. Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2006). Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Rabinovici, S. J. M. (2012). Motivating Private Precaution with Public Programs: Insights from a Local Earthquake Mitigation Ordinance. PhD. Dissertation, School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley. Fall.Google Scholar
  19. ResilientSF. (2011). http://resilientsf.org/partners. Accessed 20 June 2011.
  20. The ResilientSF Initiative. (2011). Office of the Mayor, City and County of San Francisco.Google Scholar
  21. Siembieda, W. (2010). Towards a concept of disaster resilience: A commentary on behalf of the editorial committee. Journal of Disaster Research, Special issue on “Building Local Capacity for Long-Term Disaster Resilience”, 5(5), 487–493.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, G. (2011). Planning for post disaster recovery: A review of the United States disaster assistance framework. Arlington: Public Entity Research Institute.Google Scholar
  23. SPUR. (2008). file:///Users/wsiembie/Documents/SPUR%20Resilinet%20SF%20part-i-condensed-version.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2011.Google Scholar
  24. Topping, K., & Schwab, J. C. (Eds.). (2010). Hazard mitigation: Integrating best practices into planning. Planning advisory service report no. 560. Chicago: American Planning Association Press. Chap. 7, Case studies in intermediate jurisdictions.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Geological Survey, Field, E. F., and Milner R. F., and the 2007 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. (2007). Forecasting California’s Earthquakes—What Can We Expect in the Next 30 Years? Fact Sheet 2007–3027, version 1.0.Google Scholar
  26. Walter, R., Young, R., & Husain, K. (2012). Technical review of the 2010 community wide GHG inventory for the city and county of San Francisco. San Francisco: ICF International. April 12.Google Scholar
  27. Wisner, B., Gaillard, J. C., & Kelman, I. (2012). The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California Polytechnic State UniversitySan Luis ObispoUSA

Personalised recommendations