Recovering from the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami: Lessons for Climate Change Response

  • Ahana Lakshmi
  • Purvaja R.
  • Ramesh R.Email author
Part of the Environmental Hazards book series (ENHA)


The impact, relief and recovery processes after the devastation caused by the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami offer a number of lessons for building the resilience of the coast and coastal communities to overcome challenges associated with climate change. This chapter focuses on the response and recovery undertaken in the coastal state of Tamil Nadu, the worst affected state on the Indian mainland. These lessons are useful for facing climate change-related challenges, especially since India’s long coastline is subject to a variety of hazards such as cyclones and storm surges apart from sea-level rise which, on an annual basis, cause extensive damage to coastal areas, and which are expected to increase in intensity in the future. Thus the reduction of vulnerability has to be done in a planned and phased manner. Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into development activities requires conducting a needs assessment to inform capacity building and livelihood enhancement initiatives and improving the horizontal and vertical coordination of activities that are likely to enable adaptation to various impacts due to climate change along the coast. Integrated coastal management offers opportunities to achieve these objectives.


Tsunami Tamil Nadu Vulnerability Resilience Risk reduction 



The authors thank V. Vivekanandan, Annie George and Satish Babu for many useful discussions.


  1. Anon. (12 April 2012). How official machinery reacted to the tremors. The Hindu, Chennai.Google Scholar
  2. Babu, S., George, A., Lakshmi, A., Katticaren, R., & Sukumaran, S. (2008). Building local capacities for disaster response and risk reduction. An Oxfam-BEDROC study. BEDROC.
  3. BMTPC. (2008). Vulnerability atlas for India. Building Materials Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Census of India. (2011). Provisional population totals: Tamil Nadu. Accessed 26 Oct 2012.
  5. Cicin-Sain, B., & Knecht, R. W. (1998). Integrated coastal and ocean management—Concepts and practices. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  6. CIESIN. (2007). Columbia University. Centre for International Earth Science Information Network. Accessed 24 Oct 2012.
  7. Danielsen, F., Sørensen, M. K., Olwig, M. F., Selvam, V., Parish, F., Burgess, N. D., Hiraishi, T., Karunagaran, V. M., Rasmussen, M. S., Hansen, L. B., Quarto, A., & Suryadiputra, N. (2005, October 28). The Asian tsunami: A protective role for coastal vegetation. Science, 310, 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Das, S., & Vincent, J. R. (2009, May 5). Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cyclone. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 106(18), 7357–7360. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810440106. (Published online before print April 20, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DoF (Department of Fisheries). (2004). Fisheries department policy note 2004–2005. Animal husbandry and fisheries department, government of Tamil Nadu. Accessed 26 Oct 2012.
  10. DoF (Department of Fisheries). (2005). Census of Marine Fisherfolk 2000. Department of Fisheries, Government of Tamil Nadu. FIMSUL, Vivekanandan, V., & Kasim, H. M. (2011a). Fisheries management options for Tamil Nadu & Puducherry. A report prepared for the fisheries management for sustainable livelihoods (FIMSUL) Project, undertaken by the UN FAO in association with the World Bank, the Government of Tamil Nadu and the Government of Puducherry. Report No. FIMSUL/R20.FAO/UTF/IND/180/IND. New Delhi, Chennai and Puducherry, India.Google Scholar
  11. FIMSUL. (2011b). Fisheries management for sustainable livelihoods (FIMSUL) Project in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, India. FINAL REPORT. Delhi: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. FAO Office, Lodi Estate, Delhi, India. FAO/UTF/IND/180/IND. (Vol. I—Key Findings and Recommendations; and Vol. II—Summary of FIMSUL Process and Outcomes under each Work Package).Google Scholar
  12. George, A., & Lakshmi, A. (2012, February). Cyclone Thane: Disaster preparedness and response. TRINet Newsletter. The Resource and Information Network for the Coast.
  13. Gomathy, N. B. (2006, January 18–19). The role of traditional panchayats in coastal fishing communities in Tamil Nadu, with special reference to their role in mediating tsunami relief and rehabilitation. Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Post-Tsunami Rehabilitation of Fishing Communities and Fisheries-based livelihoods. Chennai, India. International Collective in Support of Fishworkers (ICSF) (pp. 211–244).Google Scholar
  14. GoTN. (2005, December). Tiding over tsunami—Part I. State Relief Commissioner, Revenue Administration, Disaster Management and Mitigation Department, Government of Tamil Nadu.Google Scholar
  15. GoTN. (2008, October). Tiding over tsunami—Part II. State Relief Commissioner, Revenue Administration, Disaster Management and Mitigation Department, Government of Tamil Nadu.Google Scholar
  16. GoTN. (2011). Action taken on World Bank funded ETRP (Emergency Tsunami Reconstruction Project (as on 21–12–2011) and Action Taken on ADB (Asian Development Bank) funded TEAP (Tsunami Emergency Action Project). Accessed 23 Oct 2012.
  17. Hedao, P. (2006, June 12). “Natural ecosystems along the Coromandel coast”. Presentation at the TRINet Workshop on “Post Tsunami Coastal Protection Projects. Chennai. Tsunami Rehab Information Network. Accessed 15 June 2006.
  18. IMD. (2011). Very severe cyclonic storm “THANE” over the Bay of Bengal, (25–31 December, 2011): A report. Accessed 15 Oct 2012.
  19. INCCA. (2010, November). Climate change and India: A 4 by 4 assessment. Indian network for climate change assessment. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
  20. Kathiresan, K., & Rajendran, N. (2005). Coastal mangrove forests mitigated tsunami. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 65, 601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kay, R., & Alder, J. (1999). Coastal planning and management. E & FN Spon. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  22. Kurian, V. (4 January 2012). IMD claims its radars chased ‘Thane’ to the wire. The Hindu Business Line.Google Scholar
  23. Kurien, J. (1995). The Kerala model: Its central tendency and the outlier. Social Scientist, 23, (1–3, Jan–Mar), 70–90.Google Scholar
  24. Lakshmi, A. (2007, March). “Agents of change”. TRINet Newsletter: Tsunami rehab information network. Accessed 1 Mar 2007.
  25. Lakshmi, A., & Bau, M. (2007). Project management needs in disaster situations: Lessons learnt from the Boxing day Tsunami. Originally published as a part of 2007 PMI (Project Management Institute) Global Congress Proceedings—Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  26. Lakshmi, A., & Babu, S. (2010). Community based reconstruction experiences after 2004 Tsunami. In R. Shaw & R. R. Krishnamurthy (Eds.), Communities and Coastal Zone Management (pp 11–27). Research Publishing: Singapore.Google Scholar
  27. Lakshmi, A., & George, A. (2012, May). Changing responses to natural hazards. TRINet Newsletter: The resource and information network for the coast. Accessed 1 May 2012.
  28. Lakshmi, A., Schiavina, A., Banerjee, P., Reddy, A., Mandeen, S., Rodriguez, S., & Apte, D. (2012, October). The challenged coast of India. A report prepared by PondyCAN (Pondicherry Citizen Action Network) in collaboration with BNHS (Bombay Natural History Society) and TISS (Tata Institute for Social Sciences).Google Scholar
  29. Lay, T., Kanamori, H., Ammon, C., Nettles, M., Ward, S., Aster, R., Beck, S., Bilek, S., Brudzinski, M., Butler, R., DeShon, H., Ekström, G., Satake, K., & Sipkin, S. (2005). The great Sumatra–Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004. Science, 308, 1127–1133. doi:10.1126/science.1112250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maplecroft. (2010). Big economies of the future—Bangladesh, India, Philippines, Vietnam and Pakistan—Most at risk from climate change. Accessed 26 Oct 2012
  31. McGranahan, G., Balk, D., & Anderson, B. (2007). Low Elevation Coastal Zone (LECZ) Urban-Rural Population Estimates, Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project (GRUMP), Alpha Version. Palisades: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Accessed 26 Oct 2012.
  32. MoEF. (2011). The coastal regulation zone notification, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
  33. MSSRF. (2008). Ecological rehabilitation of the coastal areas of Pichavaram: Establishing community-based Mangrove and other coastal vegetation as bioshield. Annual Report of the M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2007–2008. Accessed 26 Oct 2012.
  34. Murthy, K. S. R., Subrahmanyam, A. S., Murty, G. P. S., Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., Subrahmanyam, V., MohanaRao, K., Suneetha Rani, P., Anuradha, A., Adilakshmi, B., & Sri Devi, T. (2006, June 10) Factors guiding tsunami surge at the Nagapattinam–Cuddalore shelf, Tamil Nadu, east coast of India. Current Science, 90(11), 1535–1538.Google Scholar
  35. NCRC. (2006). Report of national workshop on disaster preparedness in agriculture, NGO coordination and resource centre, Nagapattinam, August 3–4, 2006.Google Scholar
  36. NDMA (2008). National disaster management guidelines: Management of cyclones. National Disaster Management Agency. Accessed 24 Oct 2012.
  37. Niyas et al. (2009). Climate Profile of India. Contribution to the Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment (National Communication-II). Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. (Quoted in S. D. Attri and A. Tyagi, 2010)Google Scholar
  38. Ramesh Kumar, M. R., & Sankar, S. (2010, December). Impact of global warming on cyclonic storms over north Indian Ocean. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 39(4), 516–520.Google Scholar
  39. Salagrama, V. (2006). Trends in poverty and livelihoods in coastal fishing communities of Orissa State, India. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 490. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2006a.Google Scholar
  40. Saxena, S., Purvaja, R., Suganya, G., Divya, M. & Ramesh, R. (2012). Coastal hazard mapping in the Cuddalore region, South India. Natural Hazards Published Online 13 September 2012. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0362-7.Google Scholar
  41. Subramanian, B. R. (2006). Inundation of seawater due to Indian Ocean Tsunami along the Indian Coast. In G. V. Rajamanickam, B. R. Subramaniyan, M. Baba, R. Ramesh, L. Elango, & M. Prithviraj (Eds.), 26th December 2004 tsunami: Causes, effects, remedial measures pre and post tsunami disaster management: A geoscientific perspective (pp 10–44). New Delhi: New Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. UN. (2008). Disaster recovery: A focus on good practices. UN Tsunami Response—India. Compiled by Dave Storey and Anupama Pai.Google Scholar
  43. UNDP. (2005). Forearmed for surviving natural disasters. Good Practice 2005-2004-18.4648364550. UNDP Asia-Pacific.Google Scholar
  44. Unnikrishnan, A. S., Manimurali, M., & Ramesh Kumar, M. R. (2010, November 16). Sea-level changes along the Indian coast—Impacts & vulnerability. Presentation made at the National Workshop 16th Nov 2010. Accessed 19 Sept 2011.
  45. UNTRS. (2005). Tsunami damages in India: United Nations team for tsunami recovery support. Accessed 4 Feb 2009.
  46. UNTRS/FAO. (2008). Setting directions for sustainable fisheries and coastal livelihoods in the post-tsunami context, India. A report of the interventions by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) under the United Nations team for Tsunami Recovery Support.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Sustainable Coastal ManagementAnna University CampusChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations