Skip to main content

If Women Hold Up Half the Sky, How Much of the World’s Food Do They Produce?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Gender in Agriculture

Abstract

This chapter explores—and explodes—the oft-quoted stylized fact that women produce 60–80 % of food in the developing world. It uses three approaches to shed light on this issue: (1) analyzing labor inputs to agriculture, using both employment data and time-use data; (2) analyzing different ways of assigning agricultural output to men or women, based on four nationally representative household survey datasets; and (3) estimating women’s labor productivity relative to men at the macro level, using national-level agricultural productivity data across time and countries. While it is not possible to substantiate the claim that women produce 60–80 % of the food in developing countries—or even that they provide 60–80 % of the labor in agriculture, women contribute a large portion of the measured contributions to agricultural labor and women’s share of the measured agricultural labor force has a positive impact on national-level agricultural productivity. While women are not the majority of agricultural workers, the agricultural sector is important for women: 48 % of the economically active women in the world—and 79 % in developing countries—report that their primary activity is agriculture. The “60–80 %” statistical claim obscures the complex underlying reality, that it is difficult to separate women’s labor from other uses and from men’s labor, and that it cannot be understood properly without considering the gender gap in access to land, capital, assets, human capital, and other productive resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The one reference that indicates that these numbers are not accurate is Jackson (2005), who says, “It is interesting that this statement is so enduring, so effective—and so wrong…”.

  2. 2.

    It is not clear what it would mean for food not to be locally grown. Usually the context implies that it is consumed near where it is produced.

  3. 3.

    Katz (2003) has similar estimates.

  4. 4.

    These include Congo, Jordan, Libya, Palestinian Territory, Portugal, and Turkey.

  5. 5.

    For example, a discussion of these studies in Africa by Charmes (2006) provides an analysis of the nonmarket time spent in agricultural activities, but does not include the measure of agricultural activities in the market sector.

  6. 6.

    See Deere (2005) and Lastarria-Cornhiel (2009) for reviews of this literature and Jarvis and Vera-Toscano (2004) for an econometric analysis of agricultural wages in Chile for men and women.

  7. 7.

    See Ganguly (2003) and Jose (1989).

  8. 8.

    Livestock products are also not included in this section of the analysis.

  9. 9.

    While the data are also available on land owned by men and women, it isn’t possible to sort out which outputs are produced on land that is owned by an individual, separate from that simply held by them.

  10. 10.

    For example, Hoddinott and Haddad (1995) and Duflo and Udry (2001) use gender patterns of cropping in Côte d’Ivoire to separate men’s and women’s incomes.

  11. 11.

    The econometric estimations all were done both with and without a measure of gross national product (GNP) per/capita. This is occasionally used as a measure of labor quality, but is certainly simultaneously determined with agricultural output per worker in the agricultural labor force. While lagged GNP could be included, the levels are still highly correlated with agricultural output per worker. The coefficients on women’s share of labor were robust to the inclusion or exclusion of this variable.

  12. 12.

    For example, see Craig et al. (1997), Wiebe et al. (2000), and Vollrath (2007).

  13. 13.

    This specification assumes constant returns to scale in the production technology.

  14. 14.

    Using the indicator variables for the year does not impose the structure of a smooth growth rate that would be implied by including a time trend; this is a more general specification.

  15. 15.

    See Doss (2001) for a review of this literature on Africa.

  16. 16.

    See Peterman et al. (2011) for a review of the literature on nonland agricultural inputs, and Peterman et al. (Chap. 7).

  17. 17.

    FAOSTAT.

References

  • Acharya M, Bennett L (1982) Women and the subsistence sector: economic participation and household decisionmaking in Nepal. World Bank staff working paper number 526. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackden CM, Wodon Q (eds) (2006) Gender, time use, and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank working paper no 73. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmes J (2006) A review of empirical evidence on time use in Africa from UN-sponsored surveys. In: Blackden CM, Wodon Q (eds) Gender, time use, and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank working paper no 73. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 39–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig B, Pardey P, Roseboom J (1997) International productivity patterns: Accounting for input quality, infrastructure, and research. Am J Agric Econ 79(4):1064–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brauw A, Li Q, Liu C, Rozelle S, Zhang L (2008) Feminization of agriculture in China? Myths surrounding women’s participation in farming. China Q 194(June):327–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere CD (2005) The feminization of agriculture? Economic restructuring in rural Latin America. Occasional paper 1. UN Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Doss CR (2001) Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: lessons from 25 years of experience. World Dev 29(12):2075–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doss C (2002) Men’s crops? Women’s crops? The gender patterns of cropping in Ghana. World Dev 30(11):1987–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doss C, Morris M (2001) How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations? The case of improved maize technology in Ghana. Agric Econ 25(1):27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo E, Udry C (2001) Intrahousehold resource allocation in Côte d’Ivoire: social norms, separate accounts, and consumption choices. Mimeo, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (no date-a) FAO focus on women and food security. Rome. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (no date-b) FAOSTAT. Rome. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org

  • Fontana M, Natali L (2008) Gendered patterns of time use in Tanzania: public investment in infrastructure can help? Paper prepared for the IFPRI project on evaluating the long-term impact of gender-focused policy interventions, University of Sussex, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly ATS (2003) Feminization of India’s agricultural work force. Labor Educ 131–132:29–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Statistical Services (1999) Ghana living standards survey, 1998–99. Accra, Ghana

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno de Nicaragua (2001) Encuesta Nacional de Hogares sobre medición de nivel de vida. Instituto de Estadísticas y Censos. Proyecto MECOVI, Managua

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta GR (2009) When women farm, crops and economies grow. Des Moines Register

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami Y, Ruttan V (1985) Agricultural development: an international perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoddinott J, Haddad L (1995) Does female income share influence household expenditure patterns? Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 57(1):77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson C (2005) Strengthening food policy through gender and intrahousehold analysis: impact assessment of IFPRI multicountry research. IFPRI impact assessment discussion paper 23. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain D (1996) Valuing work: time as a measure. Econ Polit Wkly 31(43):48–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis L, Vera-Toscano E (2004) Seasonal adjustment in a market for female agricultural workers. Am J Agric Econ 86(1):254–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose AV (1989) Limited options: women workers in rural India. International Labour Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz E (2003) The changing role of women in the rural economies of Latin America. In: Davis B (ed) Food, agriculture, and rural development: current and emerging issues for economic analysis and policy research–II, vol I, Latin America and the Caribbean. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 31–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastarria-Cornhiel S (2009) Feminization of agriculture: trends and driving forces. RIMISP. Background paper for the world development report 2008. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney BG (1979) Collection and analysis of data on rural women’s time use. Learning about rural women. Stud Fam Plan 10(11/12):379–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra R, Hill Rojas M (2008) A significant shift: women, food security and agriculture in a global marketplace. International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) citing FAO focus on women and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Retrieved at http://www.icrw.org/publications/women-food-security-and-agriculture-global-marketplace

  • Momsen JH (1991) Women and development in the Third World. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peterman A, Behram J, Quisumbing A (2010) A review of empirical evidence on gender differences in nonland agricultural inputs, technology, and services in developing countries. IFPRI discussion paper 00975. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman A, Quisumbing A, Behrman J, Nkonya E (2011) Understanding the complexities surrounding gender differences in agricultural productivity in Nigeria and Uganda. J Dev Stud 47(10):1482–1509

    Google Scholar 

  • Quisumbing A (1996) Male–female differences in agricultural productivity: methodological issues and empirical evidence. World Dev 24(10):1579–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito K, Mekonnen H, Spurling D (1994) Raising the productivity of women farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Africa Technical Department series no 230. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa) (1972) Women: the neglected human resource for African development. Can J Afr Stud/Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines. Special issue: the roles of African women: past, present, and future 6(2):359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath D (2007) Land distribution and international agricultural productivity. Am J Agric Econ 89(1):202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe K, Soule M, Narrod C, Breneman V (2000) Resource quality and agricultural productivity: a multicountry comparison. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Tampa. Retrieved at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/21723/1/sp00wi01.pdf

  • World Bank (2001) Bosnia-Herzogovenia. Living standards study survey. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl Doss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix Tables

Appendix Tables

Table 4.6 Agricultural productivity and female share of total population active in agriculture–Developed and developing countries, high and low income countries
Table 4.7 Agricultural productivity and female share of total population active in agriculture

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doss, C. (2014). If Women Hold Up Half the Sky, How Much of the World’s Food Do They Produce?. In: Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Raney, T., Croppenstedt, A., Behrman, J., Peterman, A. (eds) Gender in Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics