Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why is it Hard to Read Arabic?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Arabic Literacy

Part of the book series: Literacy Studies ((LITS,volume 9))

Abstract

Previous research has shown that reading in Arabic is a slower process than reading in other languages, even among skilled native Arabic speakers. In addition, the process of reading acquisition by beginning readers is slower than in other languages. We present three possible sources of these phenomena from both a psycholinguistic and a neuropsychological perspective. We examine the effects of diglossia (the fact that children learn to read a language in which they are not fluent), and the visual characteristics of Arabic orthography on reading acquisition, and suggest that the particular combination of grapheme-phoneme relations and visual characteristics of Arabic orthography result in a specific reading strategy among skilled readers that involves the cerebral hemispheres differently in Arabic than in Hebrew or English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdulhadi, S., Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar. Z. (2011). Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing SystemsResearch, 3(2), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2000). Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visualprocesses underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asaad, H. (2011).The effects of the visual characteristics of Arabic orthography on reading acquisition. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Haifa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, R. (1984). Orthography and reading of the Arabic language. In J. Aaron & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, R. (1993). The nature of Arabic reading and spelling errors of young children. Reading and Writing, 5, 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basharaheel, L. (2009). Gulf News, 9aba72l5air! Texting, Arab style.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, M. J., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Complementary right and left hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. (1886). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11, 277-282, 524–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, S., Federmeier, K., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2005). Right hemispheresensitivity to word and sentence level context: Evidence from event-relatedbrain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M. (1990). Arabic linguistics: The current scene. In M. Eid (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics I (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. W., Ferreira, R., Cathles-Hagan, P., Holt, K., Jarvis, L., & Barca, L., (2009). Word learning and the cerebralhemispheres: from serial to parallelprocessing of written words. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B ,364, 3675–3696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z. (1999). Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords. Neuropsychology, 13(4), 498–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2000).Bilingual is as bilingual does: Metalinguistic abilities of Arabic-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics 21, 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2004). Morphological and orthographic effects on hemispheric processing of nonwords: A Cross-linguistic comparison. Reading and Writing, 17, 691–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2007). Morphological structure and hemispheric functioning: The contribution ofthe right hemisphere to reading in different languages. Neuropsychology, 21(4), 470–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., & Ganayim, D. (2004). Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Zaidel, E. (1992). Letter matching in the hemispheres: Speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Neuropsychologia, 30, 699–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Zaidel, E. (1994). Letter matching in the disconnected hemispheres. Brain and Cognition, 25, 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, XV, 325-340; Reprinted in Dell Hymes (Ed.), Language in Culture and Society. New York, Evanston, London, 1964, 429–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, G. R., Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 120(10), 1779–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R. (2009). Selective deficit of second language: A case of Arabic-Hebrew bilingual brain-damaged patient. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5(17), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Is literary Arabic a second language for native Arab speakers?: Evidence from a semantic priming study. The Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar. Z. (2009). Language status and hemispheric involvement in reading: Evidence from trilingual Arabic speakers tested in Arabic, Hebrew, and English. Neuropsychology, 23(2), 240–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2012). The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8(3).http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/8/1/3

  • Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of the Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing. Neuropsychology, 16(3), 322–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon Peretz, J. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and reading performance:A cross language comparison. The Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(4), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivry, R. B., & Robertson, L. C. (Eds.). (1998). The two sides of perception. New York: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In L. Katz, R. Frost (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, advances in psychology:Vol. 94 (pp. 67–84). Oxford: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khateb, A., Michelb, C. M., Pegna, A. J., Thutc, G., Landis, T., & Annoni, J. M. (2001). The time course of semantic category processing in the cerebralhemispheres: An electrophysiological study. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne, M. (1998). The right hemisphere and recovery from aphasia. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of neurolinguistics (pp. 386-393). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003).The visual word form area: Expertisefor reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, O., & Eviatar, Z. (2008). Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual information: Evidence from lexical ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language, 105(2), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prunet, J. F., Be’land, R., & Idrissi, A. (2000). The mental representation of Semitic words. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 609–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C., Vaid, J., Srinivasan, N., & Chen, H. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates. Reading and Writing, 24, 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1971). Trail making test results for normal and brain-damaged children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 575–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, L. C. (1995). Hemispheric specialization and cooperation in processing complex visual patterns;. In F. L. Kitterle (Ed.), Hemispheric communication: Mechanisms and models (pp. 310-318). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of word and pseudo-words in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolatephonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 605–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38, 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Mathews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taouk, M., & Coltheart, M. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleeck, M. (1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia, 27(9), 1165–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L. (2007). Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organizationof the visual word-form system. Neuron, 55, 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of Haifa, 31905, Haifa, Israel

    Zohar Eviatar

  2. Department of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, 31905, Haifa, Israel

    Raphiq Ibrahim

Authors
  1. Zohar Eviatar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raphiq Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zohar Eviatar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel

    Elinor Saiegh-Haddad

  2. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

    R. Malatesha Joshi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R. (2014). Why is it Hard to Read Arabic?. In: Saiegh-Haddad, E., Joshi, R. (eds) Handbook of Arabic Literacy. Literacy Studies, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8545-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation