Skip to main content

Optimum Confidence Interval Analysis in Two-Factor Mixed Model with a Concomitant Variable for Gauge Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Optimization and Control Methods in Industrial Engineering and Construction

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 72))

  • 2415 Accesses

Abstract

Measurements often include a variety sources of variability due to measurement systems. The measurement systems study is performed to determine if the measurement procedure is appropriate for monitoring a manufacturing process. The measurement systems study here focuses on determining the amount of variability in a two-factor mixed model with a concomitant variable and no interaction in situations where two variables are correlated. The Analysis of variance is performed for the model and variabilities in the model are represented in a linear combination of variance components. Optimum confidence intervals are constructed using Modified Large Sample approach and Generalized Inference approach in order to determine the variability such as repeatability, reproducibility, parts, gauge, and the ratio of variability of parts to variability of gauge. A numerical example is provided to compute the optimum confidence intervals to investigate the variability in the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adamec E, Burdick RK (2003) Confidence intervals for a discrimination ratio in a gauge R & R study with three random factors. Qual Eng 15(3):383–389

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arteaga C, Jeyaratnam S, Graybill FA (1982) Confidence intervals for proportions of total variance in the two-way cross component of variance model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 11:1643–1658

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Borror CM, Montgomery DC, Runger GC (1997) Confidence intervals for variance components from gauge capability studies. Qual Reliab Eng Int 13:361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burdick RK, Borror CM, Montgomery DC (2003) A review of methods for measurement system capability analysis. J Qual Tech 35(4):342–354

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burdick RK, Borror CM, Montgomery DC (2005) Design and analysis of gauge R & R studies. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burdick RK, Graybill FA (1992) Confidence intervals on variance components. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burdick RK, Larsen GA (1997) Confidence intervals on measures of variability in R & R studies. J Qual Tech 29(3):261–273

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen HC, Li H-L, Wen M-J (2008) Optimal confidence intervals for the largest mean of correlated normal populations and its application to stock fund evaluation. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:4801–4813

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dolezal KK, Burdick RK, Birch NJ (1998) Analysis of a two-factor R & R study with fixed operators. J Qual Tech 30(2):163–170

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drain D (1996) Statistical methods for industrial process control. International Thomson Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gong L, Burdick RK, Quiroz J (2005) Confidence intervals for unbalanced two-factor gauge R & R studies. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21:727–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Graybill FA, Wang C-M (1980) Confidence intervals on nonnegative linear combinations of variance components. J Am Stat Assoc 75(372):869–873

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Montgomery DC, Runger GC (1993) Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part I: basic methods. Qual Eng 6(1):115–135

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery DC, Runger GC (1993) Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part II: experimental design models and variance component estimation. Qual Eng 6(2):289–305

    Google Scholar 

  15. Park DJ, Burdick RK (1993) Confidence intervals on the among group variance component in a simple linear regression model with nested error structure. Commun Stat Theory Methods 22:3435–3452

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Park DJ, Burdick RK (1994) Confidence intervals on the regression coefficient in a simple linear regression model with nested error structure. Commun Stat Simul Comput 23:43–58

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park DJ, Burdick RK (2003) Performance of confidence intervals in regression model with unbalanced one-fold nested error structures. Commun Stat Simul Comput 32:717–732

    Google Scholar 

  18. Park DJ, Burdick RK (2004) Confidence intervals on total variance in a regression model with unbalanced one-fold nested error structure. Commun Stat Theory Methods 33:2735–2744

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Searle SR (1987) Linear models for unbalanced data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ting N, Burdick RK, Graybill FA, Jeyaratnam S, Lu T-FC (1990) Confidence intervals on linear combinations of variance components. J Stat Comput Simul 35:135–143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsui K, Weerahandi S (1989) Generalized p-values in significance testing of hypotheses in the presence of nuisance parameters. J Amer Stat Assoc 84(381):602–607

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Yoon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Park, D.J., Yoon, M. (2014). Optimum Confidence Interval Analysis in Two-Factor Mixed Model with a Concomitant Variable for Gauge Study. In: Xu, H., Wang, X. (eds) Optimization and Control Methods in Industrial Engineering and Construction. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8044-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8044-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8043-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8044-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics