Skip to main content

Dynamic Project Management: An Application of System Dynamics in Construction Engineering and Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Optimization and Control Methods in Industrial Engineering and Construction

Abstract

Computer simulation is one of the most widely utilized tools for operational research in construction engineering and management. Although discrete event simulation (DES) has been extensively utilized in construction, system dynamics (SD) has received relatively little attention despite its great potential to address dynamic complexity in construction projects, which are inherently complex, dynamic and involve multiple feedback processes and non-linear relationships. This chapter introduces dynamic project management (DPM), an SD-based new construction project modeling approach, which has been successfully applied to deal with dynamic complexities in diverse infrastructure and building projects. Particularly, this chapter introduces three major theoretical foundations of DPM: a holistic approach, a system structure-oriented approach, and the incorporation of control time delays. This chapter is expected to serve as a useful guideline for the application of SD in construction and to contribute to expanding the current body of knowledge in construction simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pritsker AB, O’Reilly JJ (1999) Simulation with visual SLAM and AWESIM. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pegden C, Shannon R, Sadowsky R (1995) Introduction to simulation using SIMAN. McGraw Hill, OH

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banks J, Carson II JS, Nelson BL, Nicol DM (2000) Discrete-event system simulation. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  4. Law AM, Kelton DM (1999) Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brailsford SC, Hilton NA (2000) A comparison of discrete event simulation and system dynamics for modelling healthcare systems. In: Proceedings of operational research applied to health services, 18–39

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. AbouRizk SM (2010) Role of simulation in construction engineering and management. J Constr Eng Manage 136(10):1140–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee S, Han S, Peña-Mora F (2009) Integrating construction operation and context in large-scale construction using hybrid computer simulation. J Comput Civil Eng 23(2):76–83

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peña-Mora F, Han S, Lee S, Park M (2008) Strategic-operational construction management: hybrid system dynamics and discrete event approach. J Constr Eng Manage 134(9):701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walsh KD, Hershauer JC, Walsh TA, Tommelein ID, Sawhney A (2002) Lead time reduction via pre-positioning of inventory in an industrial construction supply chain. Winter Simul Conf 2002:1737–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams T (2002) Modelling complex projects. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howell GA (1999) What is lean construction. In: Proceeding of the 7th annual conference of international group for lean construction, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Fornieles JM, Fan IS, Perez A, Wainwright C, Sehdev K (2003) A work breakdown structure that integrates different views in aircraft modification projects. Concurr Eng Res Appl 11(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koskela LJ, Kagioglou M (2005) On the metaphysics of production. In: Proceeding of the 13th annual conference of international group for lean construction. Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  15. AbouRizk SM, Halpin DW, Lutz JD (1992) State of the art in construction simulation. In: Proceedings of the 1992 winter simulation conference, pp 1271–1277

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ondash SC, Maloney S, Huerta J (1988) Large project simulation: a power tool for project management analysis. In: Proceedings of the 1988 winter simulation conference los angeles. pp 231–239

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rodrigues A, Bowers J (1996) The role of system dynamics in project management. Int J Proj Manage 14(4):213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morris PWG, Hough GH (1987) The anatomy of major projects: a study of the reality of project management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davidson FP, Huot J (1991) Large scale projects - management trends for major projects. Cost Eng 33(2):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee S, Peña-Mora F, Park M (2005) Quality and change management model for large scale concurrent design and construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage 131(8):890–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin R, Raffo D (2001) Application of a hybrid process simulation model to a software development project. J Syst Softw 59:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forrester J (1961) Industrial dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ford A (1999) Modeling the environment. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sterman JD (1992) System dynamics modeling for project management. Working paper, MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  25. Park M, Peña-Mora F (2003) Dynamic change management for construction: introducing the change cycle into model-based project management. Syst Dyn Rev 19(3):213–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han S, Love PED, Peña-Mora F (2011) A system dynamics model for assessing the impacts of design errors in construction projects. Mathematical and Computer Modelling advance online publication 22 June, doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.06.039

  27. Ogata K (2002) Modern control engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee S, Peña-Mora F, Park M (2006) Reliability and stability buffering approach: focusing on the issues of errors and changes in concurrent design and construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage 132(5):452–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thiry M (1997) Value management practice. Project Management Institute, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  30. Han S, Lee S, Peña-Mora F (2012) Identification and quantification of non-value-adding effort from errors and changes in design and construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage 138(1):98–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangwon Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Han, S., Lee, S., Park, M. (2014). Dynamic Project Management: An Application of System Dynamics in Construction Engineering and Management . In: Xu, H., Wang, X. (eds) Optimization and Control Methods in Industrial Engineering and Construction. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8044-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8044-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8043-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8044-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics