Skip to main content

Lean and Agile Construction Project Management: As a Way of Reducing Environmental Footprint of the Construction Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 72))

Abstract

Construction industry effects the environment through its outputs and its process (i.e. causing CO\(_{2}\) emissions, exploitation of raw materials, energy consumption). There is need to reduce its environmental footprint of the construction industry with the help of efficient and effective construction project management, where possible benchmarking with management principles and applications in manufacturing industry. Such a key concept originated and adapted from manufacturing industry is lean and agile construction which can contribute to the reduction of environmental footprint of the construction industry, enabling especially reduction in waste, increasing value added activities. For this reason, this chapter focuses on the construction project management with respect to the agility and leanness perspective. It provides an indepth analysis of the whole project life cycle phases based on lean and agile principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdel-Razek R, Elshakour HA, Abdel-Hamid M (2007) Labour productivity: benchmarking and variability in egyptian projects. Int J Project Manage 25(2):189–197

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alinaitwe HM (2009) Prioritising lean construction barriers in Uganda’s construction industry. J Constr Developing Countries 14:15–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arbos LC (2002) Design of a rapid response and high efficiency service by lean production principles: Methodology and evaluation of variability of performance. Int J Prod Econ 80:169–183

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballard G, Howell G (1994) Implementing lean construction: improving downstream performance. In: Proceedings of the second annual conference of the international group for lean construction, Santiago, Chile

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ballard G, Howell G (1994) Implementing lean construction: stabilizing work flow. In: Proceedings of the second annual conference of the international group for lean construction, Santiago, Chile

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ballard G, Howell G (1995)“Toward construction JIT” Proceedings of Conference-Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Sheffield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ballard G, Howell GA (1998) Shielding production: an essential step in production control. J Constr Eng Manage 124(1), 11–17, ASCE, Reston, VA, Accessed 26 Aug 2011 from http://www.cce.ufl.edu

  8. Ballard G, Koskela L, Howell G, Zabelle T (2001) “Production System Design: Work Structuring Revisited”, LCI White Paper 11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bashir AM, Suresh S, Proverbs D, Gameson R (2011) A critical, theoretical, review of the impacts of lean construction tools in reducing accidents on construction sites. In: Egbu C, Lou ECW (eds) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, Bristol, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 5–7 Sept 2011, pp 249–258

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bertelsen, S. (2004). Lean construction: where are we and how to proceed. http://www.kth.se. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  11. Bicheno J (2004) The new Lean toolbox towards fast, flexible flow. Picsie Books, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  12. Breit M, Vogel M, Haubi F, Marki F, Raps M (2008) 4D design and simulation technologies and process design patterns to support lean construction methods. Tsinghua Sci Technol 13(S1):179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown MT, Bardi E (2001) Handbook of energy evaluation. A compendium of data for energy computation issued in a series of folios. Folio no 3: energy of ecosystems. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville. Available at http://www.emergysystems.org/folios.php

  14. Burton TT (2011) Accelerating lean six sigma results how to achieve improvement excelence in the new economy, J. Ross Publishing, Hardcover

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carroll BJ (2008) Lean performance ERP project management implementing the virtual lean enterprise, 2nd edn, Auerbach publications Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cucek L, Klemes JJ, Kravanja Z (2012) A Review of Footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J Cleaner Prod 34:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dobson DW, Sourani A, Sertyesilisik B, Tunstall A (2013) Sustainable construction: analysis of its costs and benefits. Am J Civil Eng Archit 1(2):32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Excellence C (2004) Effective teamwork: a best practice guide for the construction industry Constructing Excellence, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher D (1995) Benchmarking in construction industry. J Manage Eng 11(1):50–57

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gabriel E (1997) The lean approach to project management. Int J Proj Manage 15(4):205–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Galli A, Weinzettel J, Cranston G, Ercin E (2013) A footprint family extended MRIO model to support Europe’s transition to a one planet economy. Sci Total Environ, 461–462:813–818

    Google Scholar 

  22. George JM, Jones GR (2008) Understanding and managing organizational behavior. Pearson International Edition

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gnoni MG, Andriulo S, Maggio G, Nardone P (2013) “Lean occupational” safety: an application for a near-miss management system design. Saf Sci 53:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Green Building Solutions website “Environmental Issues in Construction” http://www.greenbuildingsolutions.org/Main-Menu/What-is-Green-Construction/Environmental-Issues-in-Construction

  25. Harris F, McCaffer R (1997) Modern construction management. Blackwell Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hawken P, Lovins E, Lovins H (1999) Natural capitalism—creating the next industrial revolution. Little Brown and Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoekstra AY (2008) Water neutral: reducing and offsetting the impacts of water footprints. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 28

    Google Scholar 

  28. Howell GA (1999) What is lean construction?. In: proceedings of IGLC-7. University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 26–28 Jul 1999

    Google Scholar 

  29. Howell G (2001) Introducing lean construction: reforming project management. Report Presented to the Construction User Round Table (CURT), Lean Construction Institute

    Google Scholar 

  30. Howell G, Ballard G (1994) Implementing lean construction: reducing inflow variation presented at the 2nd annual conference on lean construction at Catolica Universidad de Chile Santiago, Chile September

    Google Scholar 

  31. Howell GA, Koskela L (2000) Reforming project management: the role of lean construction. In: 8th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, Brighton, UK, 17–19 Jul 2000

    Google Scholar 

  32. Irizarry J, Karan EP, Jalaei F (2013) Integrating BIM and GIS to improve the visual monitoring of construction supply chain management. Autom Constr 31:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jeong H (2003) Distributed planning and coordination to support lean construction. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  34. King PL (2009) Lean for the process industries dealing with complexity CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, New York (A productivity press book)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Koskela L (1992) Application of the new production philosophy to construction Tech. Report No. 72, CIFE, Stanford University, CA

    Google Scholar 

  36. Koskela L, Ballard G, Tanhuanpää VP (1997) Towards lean design, management. In: IGLC-5 proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  37. Koskela L, Huovila P (1997) “On Foundations of Concurrent Engineering.” Proc. Concurrent Engineering in Construction CEC’97. In: Anumba C, Evbuomwan N (eds). Paper presented at the 1st Intl. Conf., London, 3–4 July (1997) The Institution of Structural Engineers, London, pp 22–32

    Google Scholar 

  38. Madigan D (1997) Benchmark Method Version 3, No. ACL /DLV/96/015, Agile Construction Initiative, University of Bath

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mohd Yunus NM (2006) Implementation of OHSAS 18001:1999: The experienced of construction companies in Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lean Enterprise Institute (2009) Principles of lean. http://www.lean.org. Accessed 25 Aug 2012

  41. Lim VLJ (2008) Lean construction: knowledge and barriers in implementing into Malaysia construction industry. http://eprints.utm.my

  42. Marhani MA, Jaapar A, Bari NAA (2012) Lean Construction: Towards enhancing sustainable construction in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 68:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Naylor JB, Naim MM, Berry D (1999) Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 62:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. OHSAS 18001 (2012) Overview of OHSAS 18001. http://www.vts.net.my

  45. Olomolaiye PO (1998) Construction productivity management. Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Edinburgh Gate

    Google Scholar 

  46. Osman I, Abdel-Razek RH (1996) Measuring for competitiveness: the role of benchmarking. In: Proceedings of the Cairo first international conference on concrete structures, Cairo University, Cairo, vol 1, 2–4 Jan 1996, pp 5–12

    Google Scholar 

  47. Salem O, Solomon J, Genaidy A, Minkarah I (2006) Lean construction: from theory to implementation, Manag Eng 22(4):168–175

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sertyesilisik B, Remiszewski B, Al-Khaddar R (2012) Sustainable waste management in the UK construction industry. Int J Constr Proj Manage 4(2):173–188

    Google Scholar 

  49. Seppanen O, Ballard G, Pesonen S (2010) The combination of last planner system and location based management system. http://www.lean.org

  50. Small MH, Yasin MM, Alavi J (2011) Assessing the implementation and effectiveness of process management initiatives at technologically consistent firms. Bus Process Manag J 17(1):6–20. DOI 10.1108/14637151111105553

    Google Scholar 

  51. Summers DC (2005) Quality Management, Creating and Sustaining Organizational Effectiveness Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: PEARSON Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  52. Thomas HR, Michael JH, Zavrski I (2002) Reducing variability to improve performance as a lean construction principle. J Constr Eng Manage 128(2):144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tommelein ID (1998) Pull-driven scheduling for pipe spool installation: simulation of lean construction technique. J Constr Eng Manage 124(4):279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. UNEP/SETAC (2009) Life cycle management: how business uses it to decrease footprint, create opportunities and make value chains more sustainable. www.unep.fr

  55. Vadera S, Woolas P, Flint C, Pearson I, Hodge M, Jordan W, Davies M (2008) Strategy for sustainable construction. Available: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file46535.pdf

  56. Vais A, Miron V, Pedersen M, Folke J (2006) "Lean and Green" at a Romanian secondary tissue paper and board mill–putting theory into practice. Resour Conser Recycl 46:44–74

    Google Scholar 

  57. Womack JP, JonesDT, RoosD (1990) Themachine that changed theworld.RawsonAssociates, 567 New York

    Google Scholar 

  58. Womack JP, Jones DT (1996) Lean thinking:banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. simon & schuster

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vadera S, Woolas P, Flint C, Pearson I, Hodge M, Jordan W, Davies M (2008) Strategy for sustainable construction. Available: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file46535.pdf

  60. Vais A, Miron V, Pedersen M, Folke J (2006) “Lean and Green” at a Romanian secondary tissue paper and board mill—putting theory into practice. Resour Conser Recycl 46:44–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Begum Sertyesilisik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sertyesilisik, B. (2014). Lean and Agile Construction Project Management: As a Way of Reducing Environmental Footprint of the Construction Industry. In: Xu, H., Wang, X. (eds) Optimization and Control Methods in Industrial Engineering and Construction. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8044-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8044-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8043-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8044-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics