Skip to main content

Smith-Peterson Osteotomy and Ponte Osteotomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2616 Accesses

Abstract

Both Smith-Peterson osteotomy (SPO) and Ponte osteotomy (PO) are the simplest and the most useful posterior-column-only wedge osteotomy technique. The middle column functioning as a pivot point during correction of sagittal imbalance or kyphotic deformity with SPO or PO results in the least change of the length and risk of injury of neural tissue comparing with pedicle subtraction osteotomy and vertebral column resection. Using PO results in closing wedge of posterior column without opening wedge of anterior column like SPO does. Vascular injury due to open wedge of anterior column by SPO is very rare. PO and SPO are the simplest surgical technique of osteotomy and should always be considered to be applied to achieve a balance spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith-Petersen MN, Larson CB, Aufranc OE. Osteotomy of the spine for correction of fixation deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1945;27:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams JC. Technique, dangers and safeguards in osteotomy of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1952;34:226–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Simmons EH. Kyphotic deformity of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop. 1977;128:65–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Law WA. Osteotomy of the spine. Clin Orthop. 1969;66:70–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Styblo K, Bossers GT, Slot GH. Osteotomy for kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56:294–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klems VH, Friedebold G. Ruptur der Aorta abdominalis nach Aufrichtungsoperation bei Spondylitis ankylopoetica. Z Orthop. 1971;108:554–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weatherley C, Jaffary D, Terry A. Vascular complications associated with osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: a report of two cases. Spine. 1988;13:43–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lichtblau PO, Wilson PD. Possible mechanism of aorta rupture in orthopaedic correction of rheumatoid spondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38:123–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine. 1999;24:1712–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang KW, Chen YY, Lin CC, et al. Apical lordosating osteotomy and minimal segment fixation for the treatment of thoracic or thoracolumbar osteoporotic kyphosis. Spine. 2005;30:1674–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang KW, Cheng CW, Chen HC, et al. Closing-opening wedge osteotomy for the treatment of sagittal imbalance. Spine. 2008;33:1470–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen TC, Tu MY, Wu CM, et al. Risk of aorta injury in patients treated by accomplishing an anterior open wedge and lengthening of anterior column. J Orthop Surg Taiwan. 2008;25:79–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang KW, Chen YY, Lin CC, et al. Closing wedge osteotomy versus opening wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity. Spine. 2005;30:1584–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ponte A, Sicciard GL. Surgical treatment of Scheuermann’s hyperkyphosis. Orthop Trans. 1985;9:127.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ponte A. Posterior column shortening for Scheuermann’s kyphosis. An innovative one-stage technique. In: Haher TR, Merola AA, editors. Surgical techniques for the spine. New York: Thieme; 2003. p. 107–13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al. Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine. 2010;35:2224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vidal J, Marnay T. Morphology and anteroposterior body equilibrium in spondylolisthesis L5–S1 [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1983;69:17–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vidal J, Marnay T. Sagittal deviations of the spine, and trial of classification as a function of the pelvic balance [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1984;70 Suppl 2:124–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, et al. Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine. 2006;31:E959–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duval-Beaupere G, Marty C, Barthel F, et al. Sagittal profile of the spine prominent part of the pelvis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;88:47–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:99–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, et al. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine. 2005;30:346–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:260–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, et al. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang KW, Leng X, Zhao W, et al. Quality control of reconstructed sagittal balance for sagittal imbalance. Spine. 2011;36:E186–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiggins GC, Ondra SL, Shaffrey CI. Management of iatrogenic flat-back syndrome. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15(3):E8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kao-Wha Chang MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, KW. (2015). Smith-Peterson Osteotomy and Ponte Osteotomy. In: Wang, Y., Boachie-Adjei, O., Lenke, L. (eds) Spinal Osteotomy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8038-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8038-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8037-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8038-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics