Abstract
In exploring the quality of schools’ social system, this study provides insight into in which types of schools students may encounter barriers in developing supportive teacher-student relationships because of teachers exposing low levels of trust in students. Student culture and teachability perceptions are assessed as incentives for teachers’ perceptions of students’ trustworthiness. Information was gathered from 2,104 teachers across a representative sample of 84 secondary schools in Flanders (Belgium). Multilevel analyses reveal that teacher perceptions of students’ teachability strongly predict teacher trust. This underscores the importance of teacher perceptions of students’ ability to meet the expectations imposed on them with regard to the formation of trust. Additionally, we show that teacher trust is affected by the organizational school context, although the study orientation of the student culture plays no role.
An earlier version of this article has previously been published as:Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2011). The Quality of School Life: Teacher-Student Trust Relationships and the Organizational School Context. Social Indicators Research, 110, 85–100.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In 2007, the Forum for Ethnic-Cultural Minorities roughly estimated the percentage of elementary and secondary school teachers with an immigrant background in Flanders at 1 % of the whole teaching staff
(http://www.minderhedenforum.be/2onderwijs/200710allochtoneleerkrachten.htm).
- 2.
In the Flemish educational system, no real distinction is made between public and private schools regarding state support. Historically, the private sector encountered greater development in terms of both the number of schools and the number of enrolled students. In our sample, public schools are somewhat overrepresented due to the data collection procedure favoring larger cities, in which most of the municipal schools are located.
- 3.
Transforming the variable to reduce its skewness and adjusted analyses (not reported) yielded similar results.
References
Adams, C. M. (2008). Building trust in schools: A review of the empirical evidence. In W. K. Hoy & M. DiPaola (Eds.), Improving schools: Studies in leadership and culture (pp. 29–54). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing Inc.
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Thompson, M. S. (1987). School performance, status relations, and the structure of sentiment: Bringing the teacher back in. American Sociological Review, 52, 665–682.
Becker, H. S. (1968). Social-class variations in the teacher-pupil relationship. In R. R. Bell & H. R. Stub (Eds.), The Sociology of education: A sourcebook (revised ed., pp. 155–166). Homewood: Dorsey Press.
Bishop, J. H., & et al. (2004). Why we harass nerds and freaks: A formal theory of student culture and norms. The Journal of School Health, 74, 235–251.
Blau, P. (1986). Exchange and power in social life. (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brutsaert, H. (2001). Co-educatie. Studiekansen en kwaliteit van het schoolleven [Coeducation. Educational opportunities and the quality of school life]. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.
Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cochran-Smith, M., Shakman, K., Terrell, D. G., & McQuillan, P. (2009). Good and just teaching: The case for social justice in teacher education. American Journal of Education, 115, 347–377.
Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap press of Harvard university press.
Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools. The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
Corten, R., & Dronkers, J. (2005). Schoolprestaties van leerlingen uit de lagere strata op openbare, bijzondere en privé-scholen: Een cross-nationale test van de Coleman & Hoffer-these [School performance of pupils from the lower strata in public, special and private schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman and Hoffer thesis]. Pedagogische Studiën, 82, 205–222.
Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103, 548–581.
Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. Jr. (2004a). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 11, 60–81.
Crosnoe, R., Kirkpatrick, M., & Elder, G. H. Jr. (2004b). School size and the interpersonal side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational context. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1259–1274.
Driessen, G. (2002). Sociaal-etnische schoolcompositie en onderwijsresultaten: Effecten van positie, concentratie en diversiteit [School social-ethnic composition and achievement: Effects of position, concentration and diversity. Pedagogische Studiën, 79, 212–230.
Ennis, C. D., & McCauley, M. T. (2002). Creating urban classroom communities worthy of trust. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 149–172.
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 30, 415–441.
Forsyth, P. B. (2008). The empirical consequences of school trust. In W. K. Hoy & M. DiPaola (Eds.), Improving schools: Studies in leadership and culture (pp. 1–28). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing Inc
Freeman, D. J., Brookhart, S. M., & Loadman, W. E. (1999). Realities of teaching in racially/ethnically diverse schools: Feedback from entry-level teachers. Urban Education, 34, 89–114.
Gambetta, D. (1988). Can We Trust Trust. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Braking Cooperative Relations (pp. 213-237). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601–616.
Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, 102, 3–17.
Goddard, R. D., Salloum, S. J., & Berebitsky, D. (2009). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between poverty, racial composition, and academic achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 292–311.
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43.
Hallinan, M. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81, 271–283.
Harvey, D. G., & Slatin, G. T. (1975). The relationship between child’s SES and teacher expectations: A test of the middle-class bias hypothesis. Social Forces, 54, 140–159.
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohavy, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures—A qualitative and quantitative study across 20 cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286–316.
Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184–208.
Huisman, M. (1999). Imputation of missing item responses: some simple techniques. In M. Huisman (Ed.), Item nonresponse: occurrence, causes, and imputation of missing answers to test items (pp. 91–119). Leiden: DSWO press, Leiden University.
Imber, S. (1973). Relationship of Trust to Academic Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 145–150.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2005). The Anomaly of Educational Organizations and the Study of Organizational Control. In L. V. Hedges & B. Schneider (Eds.), The social organization of schooling (pp. 91–110). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kornblau, B. (1982). The teachable pupil survey: A technique for assessing teachers’ perceptions of pupil attributes. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 170–174.
Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B., & Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357-389). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Lee, V. E. (2000). School size and the organization of secondary schools. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 327-344). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. (2nd ed.) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: John Wiley.
Meier, D. (2002). In schools we trust: Creating communities of learning in an e ra of testing and standardization. Boston: Beacon Press.
Merton, R. K. (1957). The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 8, 106–120.
Mitra, D. L. (2009). Collaborating with students: Building youth-adult partnerships in schools. American Journal of Education, 115, 407–436.
Newmann, F. M. (1981). Reducing student alienation in high schools: Implications for theory. Harvard Educational Review, 51, 546–564.
Nieto, S. (2000). Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 180–187.
Opdenakker, M.-C., & Hermans, D. (2006). Allochtonen in en doorheen het onderwijs: Cijfers, oorzaken en verklaringen [Foreigners in and through education: Figures, causes and explanations]. In S. Sierens, M. Van Houtte, P. Loobuyck, K. Delrue, & K. Pelleriaux (Eds.), Onderwijs onderweg in de immigratiesamenleving [Education on the way in the immigration society] (pp. 33-66). Gent: Academia Press.
Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323–367.
Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical lineair models. Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
Saft, E. W., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Teachers’ perceptions of their relationships with students: Effects of child age, gender, and ethnicity of teachers and children. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 125–141.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
Sitkin, S., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organizational Science, 4, 367–392.
Smyth, J. (2004). Social capital and the ‘socially just school’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 19–33.
Stanton-Salazar, R. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 1–40.
Stevens, P. A. J. (2007). Exploring the importance of teachers‛ institutional structure on the development of teachers‛ standards of assessment in Belgium. Sociology of Education, 80, 314–329.
Talacchi, S. (1960). Organization size, individual attitudes and behavior: An emperical study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 398–420.
Talbert, J. E., McLaughlin, M. W., & Rowan, B. (1993). Understanding context effects on secondary school teaching. Teachers College Record, 95, 45–68.
Tan, B. (1998). Blijvende sociale ongelijkheden in het Vlaamse onderwijs [Persistent social inequalities in Flemish education]. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 19, 169–197.
Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools Making a difference: Let’s be Realistic. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Thrupp, M., & Lupton, R. (2006). Taking school contexts more seriously: The social justice challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 308–328.
Timmerman, C., Hermans, P., & Hoornaert, J. (2002). Allochtone Jongeren in het Onderwijs. Een Multidisciplinair Perspectief [Allochthonous Youngsters in Education. A Multidisciplinary Perspective]. Leuven-Apeldoorn: Garant.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547–593.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Van Houtte, M. (2003). Reproductietheorieën getoest. De link tussen SES-compositie van de school en onderwijscultuur van leerkrachten en directie [Reproduction theories tested. The link between SES composition of the school and the academic culture of teachers and administration]. Mens en Maatschappij, 78, 547–593.
Van Houtte, M. (2004). Gender context of the school and study culture, or how the presence of girls affects the achievement of boys. Educational Studies, 30, 409–423.
Van Houtte, M. (2005). Climate or culture? A plea for conceptual clarity in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 71–89.
Van Houtte, M. (2006). Tracking and teacher satisfaction: Role of study culture and trust. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 247–254.
Van Houtte, M. (2007). Exploring teacher trust in technical/vocational secondary schools: Male teachers’ preference for girls. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 826–839.
Van Houtte, M., Stevens, P. A. J., Sels, A., Soens, K., & Van Rossem, R. (2005). De invloed van structurele en compositorische schoolkenmerken op prestaties en welbevinden van leerlingen in het secundair onderwijs: een verklaring via cultuur [The influence of structural and compositional school features on achievement and well-being of secondary school students. An explanation through culture]. (Unpublished report). Ghent: Ghent University, Department of Sociology, Research Group on Youth, Education, and Gender
Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2009). Faculty trust and organizational school characteristics: An exploration across secondary schools in flanders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 556–589.
Van Petegem, K., Aelterman, A., Van Keer, H., & Rosseel, Y. (2008). The influence of student characteristics and interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom on student’s wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 85, 279–291.
Warrington, M., Younger, M., & Williams, J. (2000). Student attitudes, image and the gender gap. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 393–407.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour. How working class kids get working class jobs. Hants: Saxon House.
Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior 8 (pp. 53–111). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Maele, D., Van Houtte, M. (2014). Teacher Trust in Students and the Organizational School Context: The Role of Student Culture and Teachability Perceptions. In: Van Maele, D., Forsyth, P., Van Houtte, M. (eds) Trust and School Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8014-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8014-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8013-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8014-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)