Skip to main content

Baselines and Monitoring Methods for Detecting Impacts of Hydrodynamic Energy Extraction on Intertidal Communities of Rocky Shores

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Humanity and the Sea ((HUMSEA))

Abstract

As part of the UK government’s objective to deliver an increasing proportion of electricity from renewable sources, West Mainland, Orkney, is at the forefront of the development of wave-energy extraction devices. Exposure to wave energy plays a dominant role in shaping the Orkney landscape and determining the ecological community, but little is known of the consequences of commercial scale removal of energy from the environment. An extensive long-term monitoring programme to assess the impacts of altering wave-energy exposure on these rocky shores alongside responses to other systemic forcing agents such as climate change is continuing. Within the programme are photographic surveys, including quadrat and fixed viewpoint techniques, littoral studies of sentinel species, and the development of cost-effective wave-energy quantifying devices. Software has been developed to analyse images efficiently, to produce quantitative data on species and biotope coverage. Additionally, extensive surveys along the shoreline provide detailed image records, including areas without prior scientific description, and have helped identify locations of environmental sensitivity. Collectively, the data provide a comprehensive pre-development baseline along this important coast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ang PO (1999) Natural dynamics of a Fucus distichus (Phaeophyceae, Fucales) population: reproduction and recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 78:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angus Council (2010). Wind, wave and tidal characteristics, coastal processes, shoreline management plan. http://www.angus.gov.uk/ac/documents/roads/SMP/default.html. Accessed 2012

  • Baardseth E (1970) A square-scanning, two-stage sampling method of estimating seaweed quantities. Norwegian Institute for Seaweed Research 33:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantine W J (1961) A biologically defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Field Stud 1:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes H (1956) The growth rate of Chthamalus stellatus (Poli). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 35:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry JP, Baxter CH, Sagarin RD, Gilman SE (1995) Climate-related, long-term faunal changes in a California rocky intertidal community. Science 267:672–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter JM (1983) Allometric relationships of Patella vulgata L. shells characters at three adjacent sites at Sandwick Bay in Orkney. J Nat Hist 17:743–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter JM, Jones AM, Simpson JA (1985) A study of long-term changes in some rocky shore communities in Orkney. Proc Roy Soc Edinb 87B:47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkby T, Rinde E, Erikstad L, Bakkestuen V (2009). Spatial predictive distribution modelling of the kelp species Laminaria hyperborea. ICES J Mar Sci 66:2106–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell EC, Denny MW (1994) Quantifying “wave exposure”: a simple device for recording maximum velocity and results of its use at several field sites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 181:9–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broitman BR, Mieszkowska N, Helmuth B, Blanchette CA (2008) Climate and recruitment of rocky shore intertidal invertebrates in the eastern North Atlantic. Ecology 89:S81–S90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows MT, Harvey R, Robb L (2008) Wave exposure indices from digital coastlines and the prediction of rocky shore community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 353:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows MT, Jenkins SR, Robb L, Harvey R (2010) Spatial variation in size and density of adult and post-settlement Semibalanus balanoides: effects of oceanographic and local conditions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 398:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows MT, Moore JJ, James B (2002) Spatial synchrony of population changes in rocky shore communities in Shetland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 240:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral JP, Jorge RMN (2007) Compressibility and shell failure in the European Atlantic Patella limpets. Mar Biol 150:585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castilla JC, Steinmiller DK, Pacheco CJ (1998) Quantifying wave exposure daily and hourly on the intertidal rocky shore of central Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat 71:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor D, Allen J, Golding N, Howell K, Liebernecht L, Noerten K, Reker J (2004) The marine habitat classification for Britain and Ireland (v04.05). http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/MarineHabitatClassification. Accessed 2012

  • Crisp DJ, Southward AJ (1953) Isolation of intertidal animals by sea barriers. Nature 172:208–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp DJ, Southward AJ (1958) The distribution of intertidal organisms along the coasts of the English Channel. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 37:157–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp DJ, Southward AJ, Southward EC (1981) On the distribution of the intertidal barnacles Chthamalus stellatus, Chthamalus montagui and Euraphia depressa. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 61:359–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delany J, Myers AA, McGrath D (1998) Recruitment, immigration and population structure of two coexisting limpet species in mid-shore tidepools, on the west coast of Ireland. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 221:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny MW (1983) A simple device for recording the maximum force exerted on intertidal organisms. Limnol Oceanog 28:1269–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny MW (1987) Life in the maelstrom: the biomechanics of wave-swept rocky shores. Trends Ecol Evol 2:61–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denny MW (1995) Predicting physical disturbance: mechanistic approaches to the study of survivorship on wave-swept shores. Ecol Monog 64:371–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny MW (2000) Limits to optimization: fluid dynamics, adhesive strength and the evolution of shape in limpet shells. J Exp Biol 203:2603–2622

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Digby PGN, Kempton RA (1987) Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2012) Natura 2000 network. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/index_en.htm. Accessed May 2012

  • Edelstein T, McLachlan J (1975) Autecology of Fucus distichus ssp distichus (Phaeophyceae: Fucales) in Nova Scotia, Canada. Mar Biol 30:305–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2008) About the EUNIS database. European environment agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/about.jsp. Accessed 2012

  • EMEC (European Marine Energy Centre) (2006) Monthly Report, January 2006. European Marine Energy Centre, Orkney

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth LB, Crowe TP (2010) Competition and habitat suitability: small-scale segregation underpins large-scale coexistence of key species on temperate rocky shores. Oecologia 162:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish JD, Fish S (1989) A student’s Guide to the Seashore. Unwin Hyman, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frid C, Andogeni E, Depestele J, Judd A, Rihan D, Rogers SI, Kenchington E (2012) The environmental interactions of tidal and wave energy generation devices. Environ Impact Assess 32:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuji A (1988) Measuring wave force on a rocky intertidal shore. Bull Faculty Fisheries, Hokkaido Univ 39:257–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville J (2001) Littoral monitoring using fixed quadrat photography. In: Davies J, Baxter J, Bradley M, Conner D, Kahn J, Murray E, Sanderson W et al (eds) Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. Marine Monitoring Handbook. pp 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins SJ, Jones HD (1992) Rocky shores. Immel, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock K, Southward A, Tittley I, Jory A, Hawkins S (2001) The impact of climate change on subtidal and intertidal benthic species in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage (Survey and Monitoring Series), Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones W, Demetropoulos A (1968) Exposure to wave action: measurements of an important ecological parameter on rocky shores in Anglesey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 2:46–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MA, Lewis JR (1986) Temporal and spatial patterns in the recruitment of Gibbula umbilicalis. Hydrobiologia 142:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MA, Williamson P, Garwood PR (1987) Annual variation in recruitment and population structure of Monodonta lineata and Gibbula umbilicalis populations at Aberaeron, mid-Wales. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 24:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JR (1964) The ecology of rocky shores. Hodder and Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JR (1986) Latitudinal trends in reproduction, recruitment and population characteristics of some rocky littoral molluscs and cirripedes. Hydrobiologia 142:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JR (1999) Coastal zone conservation and management: a biological indicator of climatic influences. Aquatic Conserv 9:401–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindegarth M, Gamfeldt L (2005) Comparing categorical and continuous ecological analyses: effects of “wave exposure” on rocky shores. Ecology 86:1346–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohse DP, Gaddam RN, Raimondi PT (2008). Predicted effects of wave energy conversion on communities in the nearshore environment. In: Nelson PA, Behrens D, Castle J, Crawford G, Gaddam RN, Hackett SC, Largier J et al (eds) Developing wave energy in coastal California: potential socio-economic and environmental effects by California Energy Commission, pp 75–98. http://www.opc.ca./gov/webmaster/ftp/project_pages/energy/CA_WEC_Effects.pdf. Accessed 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell RB (1986) Crab predation on limpets: predator behaviours and defensive features of the shell morphology of the prey. Biol Bull 171:577–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mieszkowska N, Kendall MA, Hawkins SJ, Leaper R, Williamson P, Hardman-Mountford NJ, Southward AJ (2006) Changes in the range of some common rocky shore species in Britain—a response to climate change? Hydrobiologia 555:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (2001) Fixed view-point photography. In: Davies J, Baxter J, Bradley M, Conner D, Kahn J, Murray E, Sanderson W et al (eds) Marine monitoring handbook. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, pp 179–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumby PJ, Green EP, Edwards AJ, Clark CD (1997) Coral reef habitat mapping: how much detail can remote sensing provide? Mar Biol 130:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray E, Dalkin MJ, Fortune F, Begg K (1999) Marine nature conservation review, Sector 2. Orkney: area summaries. Joint nature conservation committee, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal K, Skewes M (2004) Patella ulyssiponensis. China limpet. Marine life information network: biology and sensitivity key information sub-programme [on-line]. Mar Biol Assoc UK, Plymouth. Accessed 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan RM, Power RM, Myers RM (2010) Factors, at different scales, affecting the distribution of species of the genus Chthamalus Ranzani (Cirripedia, Balanomorpha, Chthamaloidea). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 392:46–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell HT (1957) Studies in the genus Fucus L. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 36:663–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell HT (1963) New records of Fucus distichus subspecies for the Shetland and Orkney Islands. British Phycol Bull 2:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power AM, McKrann K, McGrath D, O’Riordan RM, Simkanin C, Myers AA (2011) Physiological tolerance predicts species composition at different scales in a barnacle guild. Mar Biol 158:2149–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie AF, Hansom JD (2011) Sea level trend reversal: land uplift outpaced by sea level rise on Scotland’s coast. Geomorphology 125:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell FS (1935) On the value of certain plankton animals as indicators of water movements in the English Channel and North Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 20:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government (2009) Marine Renewables Masterplan. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2009/01/2809505sc2. Accessed 2012

  • Shields MA, Woolf DK, Grist EPM, Kerr SA, Jackson AC, Harris RE, Bell MC et al (2011) Marine renewable energy: the ecological implications of altering the hydrodynamics of the marine environment. Ocean Coast Manage 54:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjøtun K, Fredriksen S, Rueness J (1998) Effect of canopy biomass and wave exposure on growth in Laminaria hyperborea (Laminariaceae: Phaeophyta). Eur J Phycol 33:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M et al (eds) (2007) IPCC: climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Southward AJ (1991) Forty years of changes in species composition and population density of barnacles on a rocky shore near Plymouth. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 71:495–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Southward AJ, Hawkins SJ, Burrows MT (1995) Seventy years’ observations of changes in distribution and abundance of zooplankton and intertidal organisms in the western English channel in relation to rising sea temperature. J Therm Biol 20:127–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE, Henderson PA (2000) Ecological methods. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson TA, Stephenson A (1949) The universal features of zonation between tide-marks on rocky coasts. J Ecol 37:289–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MLH (1986). A physically derived exposure index for marine shorelines. Ophelia 25:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells E, Wilkinson M, Tittley I, Scanlan C (2003) Intertidal seaweed biodiversity around Orkney. Coast Zone Topics 5:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernberg T, Thomsen MS (2005) The effects of wave exposure on the morphology of Eklonia radiata. Aquat Bot 83:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerbom M, Jattu S (2006) Effects of wave exposure on sublittoral distribution of blue mussels Mytilus edulis in a heterogeneous archipelago. Mar Biol 306:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson M (1975) The marine algae of Orkney. Eur J Phycol 10:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Want .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Want, A., Beharie, R., Bell, M., Side, J. (2014). Baselines and Monitoring Methods for Detecting Impacts of Hydrodynamic Energy Extraction on Intertidal Communities of Rocky Shores. In: Shields, M., Payne, A. (eds) Marine Renewable Energy Technology and Environmental Interactions. Humanity and the Sea. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8002-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics