Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology ((VERT))

Abstract

Stone tool hafting has always been considered important, but its interpretative potential has not yet been sufficiently recognized. While wear studies have recently demonstrated the possibility of deriving hafting data from the stone tools themselves, it is essential that these kinds of data are now also integrated with regard to armature identifications. New experiments with spears and arrows show that armature identifications are complex and that no single feature on its own is diagnostic of projectile impact. Also the distinction between different projecting modes is still seriously hampered by the lack of a reliable reference. It is argued that hafting wear is essential for more adequate identifications of armatures and their projecting mode. The analysis of a number of archaeological Middle Palaeolithic and Late Palaeolithic assemblages in North West Europe allowed identifying the existence of hafted spear points for the Middle Palaeolithic sites and arrows armed with tips and barbs for the Late Palaeolithic sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambrose, S. H. (2001). Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science, 291, 1748–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, S. H. (2010). Coevolution of composite-tool technology, constructive memory, and language. Implications for the evolution of modern human behavior, Current Anthropology, 51, S135–S147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barham, L. (2013). From hand to handle: The first industrial revolution. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O., & Kuhn, S. L. (1999). The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution. American Anthropologist, 101, 322–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behre, K.-E. (Ed.). (2012). Die chronologische Einordnung der paläolithischen Fundstellen von Schöningen. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, C. A., McEwen, E., & Miller, R. (1988). Experimental archery: Projectile velocities and comparison of bow performances. Antiquity, 62, 658–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyries, S., & Inizan, M.-L. (1982). Typologie, ocre, fonction. In D. Cahen (Ed.), Tailler! pour quoi faire: préhistoire et technologie lithique II. Recent progress in microwear studies (pp. 313–322). Tervuren: Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E. (2008). Middle Palaeolithic bitumen use at Umm el Tlel around 70,000 BP. Antiquity, 82, 853–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E., Connan, J., Dessort, D., Muhesen, S., Mercier, N., Valladas, H., et al. (1996). Bitumen as a hafting material on Middle Palaeolithic artefacts. Nature, 380, 336–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E., Geneste, J. M., Griggo, C., Mercier, N., Muhesen, S., Reyss, J. L., et al. (1999). A Levallois point embedded in the vertebra of a wild ass (Equus africanus): Hafting, projectiles and Mousterian hunting weapons. Antiquity, 73, 394–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspar, J. P., & De Bie, M. (1996). Preparing for the hunt in the Late Paleolithic camp at Rekem, Belgium. Journal of Field Archaeology, 23, 437–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. D. (1970). The prehistory of Africa. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, R. E. (1988). Microwear analysis and site function of Paglicci Cave, level 4A. World Archaeology, 19, 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., Hansen, P. V., & Rasmussen, P. (1984). Macro and micro wear traces on lithic projectile points. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 3, 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudzinski, S., & Roebroeks, W. (2000). Adults only. Reindeer hunting at the Middle Palaeolithic site Salzgitter Lebenstedt, Northern Germany. Journal of Human Evolution, 38, 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1979). Palaeolithic reflections. Lithic technology and ethnographic excavation among Australian Aborigines, Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, R. E. M., Pettitt, P. B., Bronk Ramsey, C., & Van Klinken, G. J. (1998). Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 25. Archaeometry, 40, 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, W. K. (2011). Measuring use-related fracture velocity in lithic armatures to identify spears, javelins, darts, and arrows. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 1737–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. H. (1982). Hafting and retooling—Effects on the archaeological record. American Antiquity, 47, 798–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, L. R. (1989). Planning and functional variability in the Upper Palaeolithic: Microwear analysis of Upper Perigordian tools from the Flageolet I (Dordogne). Unpublished PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., & Pargeter, J. (2008). Hunting with Howiesons Poort segments: Pilot experimental study and the functional interpretation of archaeological tools. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2523–2531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., & Phillipson, L. (2010). Indications of bow and stone-tipped arrow use 64,000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa. Antiquity, 84, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, A. E., Hietala, H. J., & Williams, J. (2001). Tool standardization in the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic: A closer look. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11, 17–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, P. P. A., Martini, F., Sala, B., Magi, M., Colombini, M. P., Giachi, G., et al. (2006). A new Palaeolithic discovery: Tar-hafted stone tools in a European Mid-Pleistocene bone-bearing bed. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1310–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, E. H. (1983). The functional analysis of flint implements: Pincevent and Pont D’Ambon: Two case studies from the French Final Palaeolithic. Oxford: BAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movius, H. L. (1950). A wooden spear of third interglacial age from Lower Saxony. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 6, 139–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K. P., Andrews, P., Keeley, L. H., & Clark, D. (1977). A reappraisal of the Clacton spearpoint. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 43, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H., & Cowan, F. (1986). Experiments with spears and arrows on animal targets. Journal of Field Archaeology, 13, 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plisson, H., & Beyries, S. (1998). Pointes ou outils triangulaires? Données fonctionnelles dans le Moustérien Levantin. Paléorient, 24, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plisson, H., & Geneste, J.-M. (1989). Analyse technologique des pointes à cran solutréennes du Placard (Charente), du Fourneau du Diable, du Pech de la Boissière et de Combe Saunière (Dordogne). Paléo, 1, 65–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. P., Pettitt, P. B., Trinkaus, E., Smith, F. H., Paunovic, M., & Karavanic, I. (2000). Neanderthal diet at Vindija and Neanderthal predation: The evidence from stable isotopes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 7663–7666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2002a). Hafting traces on flint tools: Possibilities and limitations of macro- and microscopic approaches (Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2002b). Are tangs morphological adaptations in view of hafting? Macro- and microscopic wear analysis on a selection of tanged burins from Maisières-Canal. Notae Praehistoricae, 114, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2003). Towards an understanding of hafting: The macro- and microscopic evidence. Antiquity, 77, 805–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2005). Wear traces and the interpretation of stone tools. Journal of Field Archaeology, 30, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2009). The functional analysis of the Mousterian and Micoquian assemblages of Sesselfelsgrotte, Germany. Tool use and hafting in the European Late Middle Paleolithic. Quartär, 56, 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2010a). Prehension and hafting wear on flint tools. A methodology. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2010b). Un tailleur et ses traces. Traces microscopiques de production: programme expérimental et potentiel interprétatif. Bulletin de la Société Royale Belge d’Etudes Géologiques et Archéologiques, Les Chercheurs de la Wallonie hors-série, 2, 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2013). Insights into early Middle Palaeolithic tool use and hafting in Western Europe. The functional analysis of Level IIa of the early Middle Palaeolithic site of Biache-Saint-Vaast (France). Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2015). Hafting and site function in the European Middle Paleolithic. In N. J. Conard & A. Delagnes (Eds.), Settlement Dynamics of the Middle Palaeolithic and Middle Stone Age (Vol. 4, pp. 383–410). Tübingen: Kerns Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (In prep). The functional analysis of the Levallois points of Bettencourt-Saint-Ouen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V., & Plisson, H. (2014). Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact. Journal of Archaeological Science, 48, 154–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V., Stapert, D., & Johanssen, L. (2003). De Cheddar- en Creswell-spitsen van Zeijen (Dr.): ‘projectielen’ of ‘messen’? Paleo-Aktueel, 13, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V., Stapert, D., & Johanssen, L. (2005). Spitsen van Siegerswoude (Fr.), Emmerhout (Dr.) en Luttenberg (OV.): gebruikssporenonderzoek. Paleo-Aktueel, 14–15, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V., & Van Peer, P. (2006). Early evidence of complexity in lithic economy: core-axe production, hafting and use at Late Middle Pleistocene site 8-B-11, Sai Island (Sudan). Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 360–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V., Van Peer, P., & Vermeersch, P. M. (2011). Aspects of tool production, use and hafting in Palaeolithic industries from Northeast Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 60, 637–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1988). Spear points from the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Field Archaeology, 15, 441–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J., & Sisk, M. (2010). Complex projectile technology and Homo sapiens dispersal into Western Eurasia. PaleoAnthropology, 2010, 100–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, H. (1997). Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature, 385, 807–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, H., & Veil, S. (1985). Neue Untersuchungen zum eemzeitlichen Elefanten-Jagdplatz Laehringen, LDKR, Die Kunde N.F., 36, 11–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuffreau, A., & Sommé, J. (1988). Le gisement paléolithique moyen de Biache-Saint-Vaast (Pas-de-Calais). Volume I. Stratigraphie, environnement, etudes archéologiques (1ère partie). Mémoires de la Société Préhistorique Française, 21, 338p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Peer, P., Vermeersch, P., & Moeyersons, J. (1996). Palaeolithic stratigraphy of Sodmein Cave (Red Sea Mountains, Egypt). Geo-Eco-Trop, 20, 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch, P. M., Van Peer, P., Moeyersons, J., & Van Neer, W. (1994). Sodmein cave site (Red Sea Mountains, Egypt). Sahara, 6, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadley, L., Hodgskiss, T., & Grant, M. (2009). Implications for complex cognition from the hafting of tools with compound adhesives in the Middle Stone Age (South Africa). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 9590–9594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadley, L., Williamson, B., & Lombard, M. (2004). Ochre in hafting in Middle Stone Age southern Africa: A practical role. Antiquity, 78, 661–675.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to the Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS and FWO) and to the research fund of KU Leuven for their financial support of this research. My sincerest thanks are due to the Chercheurs de la Wallonie and the Préhistosite de Ramioul who were involved in the experimental program. I especially want to thank Louis Baumans, Claude Bawin, Didier Cocchi, Fernand Collin, Christian Lepers, Louis Pirnay, and Philippe Pirson.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veerle Rots .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rots, V. (2016). Projectiles and Hafting Technology. In: Iovita, R., Sano, K. (eds) Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Stone Age Weaponry. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7602-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics