Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

When Is a Point a Projectile? Morphology, Impact Fractures, Scientific Rigor, and the Limits of Inference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Stone Age Weaponry

Part of the book series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology ((VERT))

Abstract

Archaeologists have long sought a reliable means to identify whether certain pointed stone artifacts represent weapon armatures, and more specifically, whether specific types of pointed artifacts are associated with specific weapon technologies. These attempts have generally relied on ethnographic data; morphological, and more recently, morphometric, criteria; experimentation; use wear analyses; residue analyses; and combinations thereof. This paper is concerned with the reliability of established methods of identification of the stone arming tips of ancient weaponry, and in particular established means of differentiating weapon delivery technologies. The author presents a critical review of major attempts to isolate criteria intended to identify such artifacts and technologies; identifies deficiencies in the methodologies and criteria employed to date; and concludes that due to underlying subjective methods and a lack of comprehensive experimentation, current methods for identifying weapon armatures and delivery technologies lack sufficient scientific rigor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahler, S. (1971). Projectile point form and function at Rodgers shelter, Missouri. Missouri archaeological society research series 8. Columbia: University of Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahler, S. A., & McMillan, R. B. (1976). Material culture at Rodgers shelter: A reflection of past human activities. In W. R. Wood & R. B. McMillan (Eds.), Prehistoric man and his environments: A case study in the Ozark highland (pp. 163–199). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Gerfaud, P. C. (1990). Aspects of behaviour in the Middle Palaeolithic: Functional analysis of stone tools from southwest France. In P. A. Mellars (Ed.), The emergence of modern humans (pp. 389–418). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Kidder, A. V. (1937). A spear thrower from Oklahoma. American Antiquity, 3, 51–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. N. E., & Bergman, C. A. (1982). Hunters at Hengistbury: Some evidence from experimental archaeology. World Archaeology, 14, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, C. A., & Newcomer, M. H. (1983). Flint arrowhead breakage: Examples from Ksar Akil, Lebanon. Journal of Field Archaeology, 10, 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. S. (1976). Remnant cave. In G. F. Dalley (Ed.), Swallow shelter and associated sites. University of Utah anthropological papers 96 (pp. 115–127). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E., Connan, J., & Muhesen, S. (1998). Bitumen as hafting material on Middle Paleolithic artifacts from the El Kown Basin, Syria. In T. Akazawa, K. Aoki & O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), Neandertals and modern humans in Western Asia (pp. 181–204). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E., Geneste, J. M., Griggo, C., Mercier, N., Muhesen, S., Reyss, J., et al. (1999). A Levallois point embedded in the vertebra of a wild ass (Equus africanus): Hafting, projectiles and Mousterian hunting weapons. Antiquity, 73, 394–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1961). Typologie du paléolithique ancien et moyen. Bordeaux: Delmas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratlund, B. (1996). Hunting strategies in the late glacial of northern Europe: A survey of the faunal evidence. Journal of World Prehistory, 10, 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A., Yellen, J., Nevell, L., & Hartman, G. (2006). Projectile technologies of the African MSA: Implications for modern human origins. In E. Hovers & S. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition (pp. 233–256). New York: Plenum/Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J. (1940). Projectile points. American Antiquity, 5, 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callow, P. (1986). The flint tools. In P. Callow & J. Cornford, (Eds.), La Cotte de St. Brelade (pp. 251–314). Norwich (UK): Geo Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S., & Rhodes, J. (2009). The evolution of the human capacity for “killing at a distance”: The human fossil evidence for the evolution of projectile weaponry. In J.-J. Hublin & M. P. Richards (Eds.), The evolution of hominin diets: Integrating approaches to the study of palaeolithic subsistence (pp. 201–210). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corliss, D. W. (1972). Neck width of projectile points: An index of culture continuity and change (p. 29). Pocatello, Idaho: Occasional Papers of the Idaho State University Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, C. B. (1947). Caves of the Upper Gila and Hueco areas in New Mexico and Texas (Vol. 24, No. 2). Cambridge: Papers of the Peabody museum of American archaeology and ethnology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalley, G. F. (1976). Swallow shelter and associated sites. University of Utah anthropological papers 96. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalley, G. F., & Petersen, K. L. (1970). Additional artifacts from Hogup Cave. Appendix X. In M. C. Aikens (Ed.), Hogup cave. University of Utah anthropological papers 93 (pp. 283–286). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debénath, A., & Dibble, H. L. (1994). Handbook of Paleolithic typology, Vol. 1: Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockall, J. E. (1997). Wear traces and projectile impact: A review of the experimental and archaeological evidence. Journal of Field Archaeology, 24, 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, O. F. (1957). Probable uses of stone projectile points. American Antiquity, 23, 83–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenenga, F. (1953). The weights of chipped stone points: A clue to their functions. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 9, 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenenga, F., & Heizer, R. F. (1941). The origins and authenticity of an atlatl and atlatl dart from Lassen County, California. American Antiquity, 7, 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., Hansen, P. V., & Rasmussen, P. (1984). Macro and micro wear traces on lithic projectile points: Experimental results and prehistoric examples. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 3, 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbis, R. G. (1962). The old woman’s buffalo jump, Alberta. Contributions to anthropology (pp. 56–123). Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources, National Museum of Canada, Bulletin 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frison, G. C. (1974). The Casper Site. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frison, G. C. (1978). Prehistoric hunters of the high plains. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frison, G. C., Wilson, M., & Wilson, D. J. (1976). Fossil bison and artifacts from an early altithermal period arroyo trap in Wyoming. American Antiquity, 41, 28–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guernsey, S. J. (1931). Explorations in Northeastern Arizona: Report on the archaeological fieldwork of 1920–1923. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology (Vol. 12, No. 1). Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guernsey, S. J., & Kidder, A. V. (1921). Basket-maker caves of Northeastern Arizona: Report on the explorations 1916–17. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology (Vol. 8, No. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, B., & Kay, M. (1999). Stone tool function at Starosele: Combining residue and use-wear analysis. In V. P. Chabai & K. Monigal (Eds.), The Paleolithic of Crimea II: The Paleolithic of Western Crimea (Vol. 2, pp. 197–210). Liége, Belgium: Etudes et Récherches de l’Université de Liége, ERAUL 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, B., Kay, M., Marks, A. E., & Monigal, K. (2001). Stone tool function at the Paleolithic sites of Starosele and Buran Kaya III, Crimea: Behavioral implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 10972–10977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, B., & Raff, R. A. (1997). Recovery of mammalian DNA from Middle Paleolithic stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24, 601–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, M. R. (1933). Gypsum Cave, Nevada. Los Angeles: Southwest Museum Papers 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori, E. M. (1982). The archaeology of Falcon Hill, Winnemucca Lake, Washoe County, Nevada. Carson City: Nevada State Museum Anthropological Papers 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heizer, R. F. (1938). A complete atlatl dart from Pershing county, Nevada. New Mexico Anthropologist, 11, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, S. (1989). Were there hafted projectile points in the Mousterian? Journal of Field Archaeology, 16, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, S. (1990). Mousterian projectile points – Reply to Shea. Journal of Field Archaeology, 17, 114–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. S. (1998). Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 345–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, W. K. (1991). The Nachcharini composite projectile: Design theory and the study of hunting systems technology at Mugharet En-Nachcharini in the Post-Natufian Levant. M.A. thesis, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, W. K. (1997). The Paleoindian fluted point: Dart or spear armature? The identification of Paleoindian delivery technology through the analysis of lithic fracture velocity. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, W. K. (2011). Measuring use-related fracture velocity in lithic armatures to identify spears, javelins, darts, and arrows. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 1737–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janetski, J. C. (1980). Wood and reed artifacts. In J. D. Jennings (Ed.), Cowboy cave (pp. 75–95). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, University of Utah Anthropological Papers 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. D. (1957). Danger cave. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, University of Utah Anthropological Papers 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, M. (1996). Microwear analysis of some Clovis and experimental chipped stone tools. In G. H. Odell (Ed.), Stone tools: Theoretical insights into human prehistory (pp. 315–344). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental determination of stone tool uses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, A. V., & Guernsey, S. J. (1919). Archaeological explorations in Northeastern Arizona. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L., & Stiner, M. C. (2001). The antiquity of hunter-gatherers. In C. Panter-Brick, R. H. Layton, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Hunter-gatherers: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 99–142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., & Pargeter, J. (2008). Hunting with Howiesons Poort segments: Pilot experimental study and the functional interpretation of archaeological tools. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2523–2531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loud, L. L., & Harrington, M. R. (1929). Lovelock Cave (Vol. 25). USA: University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, P., Martini, F., Sala, B., Magi, M., Colombini, M., Giachi, G., et al. (2006). A new Palaeolithic discovery: Tar-hafted stone tools in a European Mid-Pleistocene bone-bearing bed. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1310–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 453–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussi, M., & Villa, P. (2008). Single carcass of Mammuthus primigenius with lithic artifacts in the Upper Pleistocene of northern Italy. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2606–2613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, J. F. (2006). How did modern humans displace neanderthals? Insights from hunter-gatherer ethnography and archaeology. In N. J. Conard (Ed.), When neanderthals and modern humans met (pp. 43–64). Tübingen: Kerns Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H. (1977). The application of micro-wear analysis to the lithic component of an entire prehistoric settlement: Methods, problems, and functional reconstructions. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H. (1988). Addressing prehistoric hunting practices through stone tool analysis. American Anthropologist, 90, 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H., & Cowan, F. (1986). Experiments with spears and arrows on animal targets. Journal of Field Archaeology, 13, 95–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargeter, J. (2011). Assessing the macrofracture method for identifying Stone Age hunting weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 2882–2888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, L. S. A. (1985). Material culture: Artifacts of wood. In D. H. Thomas (Ed.), The archaeology of Hidden Cave, Nevada. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History (Vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 251–261). New York: American Museum of Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plisson, H., & Béyries, S. (1998). Pointes ou outils triangulaires? Données fonctionnelles dans le moustérien levantin. Paléorient, 24, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigaud, J., & Simek, J. F. (1987). “Arms too short to box with God”: Problems and prospects for Paleolithic prehistory in Dordogne, France. In O. Soffer (Ed.), The Pleistocene Old World: Regional perspectives (pp. 47–61). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, D. C. (1979). Breakage patterns of central Illinois woodland projectile points. Plains Anthropologist, 24, 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2003). Towards an understanding of hafting: The macro- and microscopic evidence. Antiquity, 77, 805–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rots, V. (2004). Prehensile wear on flint tools. Lithic Technology, 29, 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salls, R. A. (1986). The La Brea atlatl foreshafts: Inferences for the Millingstone horizon. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 22, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sano, K. (2009). Hunting evidence from stone artefacts from the Magdalenian cave site Bois Laiterie, Belgium: A fracture analysis. Quatär, 56, 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenov, S. A. (1964). Prehistoric technology. Bath: Adams and Dart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (1997). Stones and shafts redux: The metric discrimination of chipped-stone dart and arrow points. American Antiquity, 62, 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1988). Spear points from the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Field Archaeology, 15, 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1990). A further note on Mousterian spear points. Journal of Field Archaeology, 17, 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1991). The behavioral significance of Levantine Mousterian industrial variability. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1993). Lithic use-wear evidence for hunting by Neandertals and early modern humans from the Levantine Mousterian. In G. L. Peterkin, H. M. Bricker & P. Mellars (Eds.), Hunting and animal exploitation in the Later Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia (pp. 189–197). American Anthropological Association Archaeological Paper 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1995a). Behavioral factors affecting the production of Levallois points in the Levantine Mousterian. In H. L. Dibble & O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology (pp. 279–292). Madison: Prehistory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1995b). Lithic microwear analysis of Tor Faraj rockshelter. In D. O. Henry (Ed.), Prehistoric ecology and evolution: Insights from Southern Jordan (pp. 85–97). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1997). Middle Paleolithic spear point technology. In H. Knecht (Ed.), Projectile technology (pp. 79–106). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2003a). Neandertals, competition, and the origin of modern human behavior in the Levant. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2003b). The Middle Paleolithic of the East Mediterranean Levant. Journal of World Prehistory, 17, 313–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2006). The origins of lithic projectile point technology: Evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 823–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2009). The impact of projectile weaponry on late Pleistocene hominin evolution. In J.-J. Hublin & M. P. Richards (Eds.), The evolution of hominid diets: Integrating approaches to the study of Paleolithic subsistence (pp. 189–199). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2011). Homo sapiens is as Homo sapiens was: “Behavioral modernity” in Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 52, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J., Davis, Z., & Brown, K. (2001). Experimental tests of middle Paleolithic spear points using a calibrated crossbow. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 807–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J., & Sisk, M. L. (2010). Complex projectile technology and Homo sapiens dispersal into western Eurasia. Paleoanthropology, 2010, 100–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, M. L., & Shea, J. J. (2009). Experimental use and quantitative performance analysis of triangular flakes (Levallois points) used as arrowheads. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 2039–2047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. A. (Ed.). (1963). Archaeological survey of the Mojave river area and adjacent regions. San Bernardino: San Bernardino County Museum Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. A., Schuiling, W. C., Ritner, L. M., Sayles, J., & Jillson, P. (1963). The archaeology of Newberry Cave, San Bernardino County, Newberry, California. In G. A. Smith (Ed.), Archaeological survey of the Mojave river area and adjacent regions (pp. 138–197). San Bernardino: San Bernardino County Museum Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solecki, R. L. (1992). More on hafted projectile points in the Mousterian. Journal of Field Archaeology, 19, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. W. (1966). Archaic cultures adjacent to the northeastern frontiers of Mesoamerica. In G. F. Ekholm & G. R. Willey (Eds.), Archaeological frontiers and external connections (pp. 59–94). Washington: Handbook of Middle American Indians 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, H. (1997). Lower Paleolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature, 385, 807–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. H. (1978). Arrowheads and atlatl darts: How the stones got the shaft. American Antiquity, 43, 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomenchuk, J. (1985). The development of a wholly parametric use-wear methodology and its application to two selected samples of Epipaleolithic chipped stone tools from Hayonim Cave, Israel. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B., & Whitman, A. (1974). Experimentation in the formation of edge damage: A new approach to lithic analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology, 1, 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy, D. R. (1982). Another Great Basin atlatl with dart foreshafts and other artifacts: Implications and ramifications. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 4, 80–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, J., & Lenoir, M. (2006). Hunting weapons of the Middle Stone Age and the Middle Palaeolithic: Spear points from Sibudu, Rose Cottage and Bouheben. South African Humanities, 18, 89–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, J., Boscato, P., Ranaldo, F., & Ronchitelli, A. (2009a). Stone tools for the hunt: Points with impact scars from a Middle Paleolithic site in southern Italy. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 850–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, J., Soressi, M., Henshilwood, C., & Mourre, V. (2009b). The still bay point of Blombos cave (South Africa). Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witthoff, J. (1968). Flint arrowpoints from the Eskimo of northwestern Alaska. Expedition, 10, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J. C. (1988). Projectile point fracture patterns and inferences about tool function. Idaho Archaeologist, 11, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. (1937). Atlatl dart foreshafts from the La Brea pits. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 36, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff, D. G. (1964). The cultural sequence of the Packard Site, Mayes County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma River Basin Survey Project: Archaeological Site Report, No. 2. Norman: University of Oklahoma Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Thompson Rivers University, 900 McGill Road, Kamloops, BC, V2C 0C8, Canada

    Wallace Karl Hutchings

Authors
  1. Wallace Karl Hutchings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wallace Karl Hutchings .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Museum for Human Behavioural Evolution,, MONREPOS Archaeological Research Centre, Neuwied, Germany

    Radu Iovita

  2. University Museum, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Katsuhiro Sano

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hutchings, W.K. (2016). When Is a Point a Projectile? Morphology, Impact Fractures, Scientific Rigor, and the Limits of Inference. In: Iovita, R., Sano, K. (eds) Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Stone Age Weaponry. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7602-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation