Skip to main content

The Contradictions of Capitalism: A Schumpeterian Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethicmentality - Ethics in Capitalist Economy, Business, and Society

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 45))

  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I discuss the works of Joseph Schumpeter. He was mainly concerned with capitalism and the conditions for its survival. He understood capitalism to be a rational organizational form that included a capitalist system (economy and business), a capitalist order (capitalist institutions and government, politics, and bureaucracies), and capitalist society (culture, mentality and habits, schemes of moral values, and middle-class expectations). Schumpeter argued that the capitalist system contributed to the prosperity of order and society. But he also thought that the capitalist system was exposed to internal contradictions that made it unstable. Threats came also from external sources. He viewed bureaucracies as being driven by political elites too eager to regulate the capitalist system, while cultural movements embodied by public intellectuals condemned capitalism for social and ethical reasons. Schumpeter linked their criticisms to a fundamental inability of capitalism to make itself emotionally attractive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I deal with entrepreneurship and innovation in Chap. 8.

  2. 2.

    See Richard Swedberg (2004, viii).

  3. 3.

    This does not mean, however, that I will neglect his economic analysis. Under the section Capitalism as a Process later in this chapter I detail some of his most important economic thoughts.

  4. 4.

    See also Swedberg (2004), xvi and xix.

  5. 5.

    Swedberg (2002, 2012) claimed that Schumpeter’s importance for today’s capitalist analysis cannot be stressed enough.

  6. 6.

    The dates in square brackets indicate the year of the original publications. In-text referencing will include the original year of publication only the first time I mention one of Schumpeter’s works. These articles have been collected in a book edited by Richard Clemence (2004), one of Schumpeter’s most respected interpreters. I have decided to quote from this latter publication to honor Clemence’s efforts to provide us with a compelling and well-rounded idea of how Schumpeter viewed some of the most controversial issues of his time. The collected articles provide insights into Schumpeter’s fears and concerns with regard to the future of democratic societies that, in his view, were the product of what he described as capitalist civilization.

  7. 7.

    One only needs to look at the emerging economies of India, China, and other Asian countries as well Africa to realize that their people are more interested in good schools, less corruption, employment, and many other things that have always been very precious to the middle class of the West, than in revolutions. Not even within the cash-stricken members of the European Union were the highly qualified and skilled unemployed youth interested in revolutionary action.

  8. 8.

    Recent studies about capitalism have persistently compared rich and poor and have captured that comparison in a succinct but powerful language of a rich 10 % versus a poor 90 %, or even more radically of 1 % rich versus 99 % poor. See Atkinson (2015), Piketty (2014), and Stiglitz (2013).

  9. 9.

    I dwell on these collapses and crises in Chaps. 5 and 6.

  10. 10.

    Even so, Schumpeter believed that small and medium business was generally threatened by big business. He thought that under conditions of prosperity, the latter would expand at the expense of the former.

  11. 11.

    Some theorists have rejected this criticism. David Graeber (2011), for example, has strongly argued that many tend to forget the “as if” nature of Marx’s analysis and that Marx “was well aware that there were more bootblacks, prostitutes, butlers, soldiers, pedlars, chimneysweeps, flower girls, street musicians, convicts, nannies, and cab drivers in the London of his day than there were factory workers” (2011, 354). That awareness, however, never transpires from Marx’s work, and neither does the fact that he wrote in the hypothetical mode.

  12. 12.

    Interestingly, although during the economic downturn of 2006–2010 many private investors lost their life savings or retirement investments, and the losses of some organizations and institutions that had invested in the share market were in the range of millions of dollars, there was a general acceptance of these changes of fortune. This seems to confirm Schumpeter’s thesis that the social groups that grow around big business are unable to protect, and, more importantly, defend their wealth and property.

  13. 13.

    Schumpeter’s perception of the role of the entrepreneur and middle class is inflexible, as he seems to be incapable of imaging an evolution in the identity of the entrepreneur and the middle class.

  14. 14.

    Daniel Bell (1996) has described the loss of the work ethos intimated by Schumpeter as one of the two most toxic cultural contradictions of capitalism.

  15. 15.

    The principal investigators of the study were the then editors of the Harvard Business Review (HBR), namely John J. Brennan, James J. Valtz, John B. Shallenberger, and Vincent P. Staton. The study included a lengthy questionnaire about business ethics which was completed by some 1700 HBR executive readers that attracted a response rate of 34 % of the 5000 cross section polled. From the data reported in Baumhart’s article, it appears that the questionnaire included essay-like responses.

References

  • Atkinson, A.B. 2015. Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumhart, R.C. 1961. How ethical are businessmen? Harvard Business Review 39(6–19): 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. [1978] 1996. The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. 1953. Social responsibility of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler Jr., A.D. 1984. The emergence of managerial capitalism. Business History Review 58: 473–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemence, R. (ed.). 2004. Essays on entrepreneurship, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism. Joseph Schumpeter. New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donham, W.B. 1927. The social significance of business. Harvard Business Review 5: 406–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. 1977. Near or far right. New Society 758: 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. 2011. Debt: The first 5,000 years. Brooklyn: Melville House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heermance, E.L. 1924. Code of ethics: A handbook. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twentieth-First Ccentury. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, A.J. 1943. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. [1911] 2002. New translations: Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 61:405–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. [1928] 2004a. The instability of capitalism. In Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism, by J. A. Schumpeter, ed. R.V. Clemence, 7th ed., 47–72. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. [1943] 2004b. Capitalism in the postwar world. In Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism, by J.A. Schumpeter, ed. R.V. Clemence, 7th ed., 175–188. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. [1946] 2004c. Capitalism. In Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism, by J. A. Schumpeter, ed. R.V. Clemence, 7th ed., 189–210. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. [1935] 2004d. The analysis of economic change. In Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism, by J. A. Schumpeter, ed. R.V. Clemence, 7th ed., 134–149. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. [1949] 2004e. Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism, by J. A. Schumpeter, ed. R. V. Clemence, 7th ed., 254–272. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. [1937] 2004f. Preface to the Japanese edition of “Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung”. In Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism, by J. A. Schumpeter, ed. R.V. Clemence, 7th ed., 165–168). New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. [1949] 2004g. The historical approach to the analysis of business cycles. In Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism, by J. A. Schumpeter, ed. R. V. Clemence, 7th edition, 322–329. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. 2013. The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. 2002. The economic sociology of capitalism. Journal of Classical Sociology 2: 227–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. 2004. Introduction to the transaction edition. In Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism, by J. A. Schumpeter, ed. R. V. Clemence, 7th ed., vii–xxxix. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. 2012. A comeback for capitalism. Contemporary Sociology 41:609–613.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Betta, M. (2016). The Contradictions of Capitalism: A Schumpeterian Analysis. In: Ethicmentality - Ethics in Capitalist Economy, Business, and Society. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7590-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics