Advertisement

Introduction

  • A. E. HughesEmail author
  • J. M. C. Mol
  • M. L. Zheludkevich
  • R. G. Buchheit
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Springer Series in Materials Science book series (SSMATERIALS, volume 233)

Abstract

This book is about reviewing and exploring the opportunities for introducing increased functionality into coating systems. The intention is to not only provide an account of recent developments, such as other books of this genre, but to also review, in detail, the nature of the problems that we are trying to address in advancing the materials science of coating systems. To this end we examine the fundamentals of corrosion science, the materials science of coatings, and developments in characterisation methods that all help to give an overview of the field. Importantly, we also look at the needs of industry with respect to developments in the coatings field.

Keywords

Coating System Layered Double Hydroxide Cosmetic Appearance Inhibitor Release Anodise Coating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    P.T. LaPuma, J.M. Fox, E.C. Kimmel, Chromate concentration bias in primer paint particles. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 33(3), 343–349 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.H. Koch, M.P.H. Brongers, N.G. Thompson, Y.P. Virmani, J.H. Payer, Corrosion Costs and Preventative Strategies in the United States, F.H.A. Department of Transport, Editor. 2002, (NACE International, Houston)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anon., Success stories: air force: material substitution and new sealing technologies keep airframes flying longer. AMPTIAC Quarterley. 7(4), 57–61Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.A.C Laudise, Aging of U.S. Air Force Aircraft. (National Research Council (United States), Washington D.C, 1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Kendig, M. Hon, L. Warren, ‘Smart’ corrosion inhibiting coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 47(3–4), 183–189 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Trinchi et al. Distributed quantum dot sensors for monitoring the integrity of protective aerospace coatings, in 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.R. Broach, J. Thorner, High-throughput screening for drug discovery. Nature 384(6604), 14–16 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O.G. Schramm et al., Polymeric nanocontainers with high loading capacity of hydrophobic drugs. Soft Matter 5(8), 1662–1667 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.Q. Zhang et al., Combinatorial and high-throughput approaches in polymer science. Meas. Sci. Technol. 16(1), 203–211 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Hoogenboom, M.A.R. Meier, U.S. Schubert, Combinatorial methods, automated synthesis and high-throughput screening in polymer research: Past and present. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 24(1), 16–32 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Bode et al., Self-healing metallopolymers based on cadmium bis(terpyridine) complex containing polymer networks. Polym. Chem. 4(18), 4966–4973 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.J. Garcia, H.R. Fischer, S. van der Zwaag, A critical appraisal of the potential of self healing polymeric coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 72(3), 211–221 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B.D. Chambers, S.R. Taylor, The high throughput assessment of aluminium alloy corrosion using fluorometric methods. Part II—A combinatorial study of corrosion inhibitors and synergistic combinations. Corros. Sci. 49(3), 1597–1609 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B.D. Chambers, S.R. Taylor, High-throughput assessment of inhibitor synergies on aluminum alloy 2024-T3 through measurement of surface copper enrichment. Corrosion 63(3), 268–276 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.D. Chambers, S.R. Taylor, The high throughput assessment of aluminium alloy corrosion using fluorometric methods. Part I—Development of a fluorometric method to quantify aluminium ion concentration. Corros. Sci. 49(3), 1584–1596 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chambers, B.D., The Discovery and Investigation of Synergistic Combinations of Corrosion Inhibitors for AA2024-T3. (University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.A. White et al., A new high-throughput method for corrosion testing. Corros. Sci. 58, 327–331 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.J. Garcia et al., Validation of a fast scanning technique for corrosion inhibitor selection: influence of cross-contamination on AA2024-T3. Surf. Interface Anal. 42(4), 205–210 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P.A. White et al., High-throughput channel arrays for inhibitor testing: Proof of concept for AA2024-T3. Corros. Sci. 51(10), 2279–2290 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T.H. Muster et al., A rapid screening multi-electrode method for the evaluation of corrosion inhibitors. Electrochim. Acta 54(12), 3402–3411 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    X.Z. Wang et al., Robust QSAR model development in high-throughput catalyst discovery based on genetic parameter optimisation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87(10A), 1420–1429 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    F.H. Scholes et al., Chromate leaching from inhibited primers—Part I. Characterisation of leaching. Prog. Org. Coat. 56(1), 23–32 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hoschke, N., et al., Structural Health Monitoring of Space Vehicle Thermal Protection Systems, in Structural Health Monitoring: Research and Applications, ed. by W.K. Chiu and S.C. Galea (Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Stafa-Zurich, 2013), pp. 268–280Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Fedrizzi et al., EIS study of environmentally friendly coil coating performances. Prog. Org. Coat. 29(1–4), 89–96 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Carbonini et al., Electrochemical characterisation of multilayer organic coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 29(1–4), 13–20 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. Wernick, R. Pinner, P.G. Sheasby, The Surface Treatment and Finishing of Aluminium and its Alloys, 5th edn. (Finishing Publications and ASM International, Teddington, 1987)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Mardel et al., The characterisation and performance of Ce(dbp)3-inhibited epoxy coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 70(2–3), 91–101 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S.A. Furman et al., Corrosion in artificial defects II. Chromate reactions. Corros. Sci. 48(7), 1827–1847 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R.L. Howard et al., Inhibition of cut edge corrosion of coil-coated architectural cladding. Prog. Org. Coat. 37(1–2), 83–90 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    I.M. Zin et al., The mode of action of chromate inhibitor in epoxy primer on galvanized steel. Prog. Org. Coat. 33(3–4), 203–210 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S.J. Garcia, Effect of polymer architecture on the intrinsic self-healing character of polymers. Eur. Polymer J. 53(1), 118–125 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fischer, H.R., Nat. Sci. 2, 873–901 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    D.Y. Wu, S. Meure, D. Solomon, Self-healing polymeric materials: A review of recent developments. Prog. Polym. Sci. 33(5), 479–522 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Challener, The intelligence behind smart coatings. J. Coat. Technol. 2006(January), 50–55Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M.W. Kendig, R.G. Buchheit, Corrosion inhibition of aluminum and aluminum alloys by soluble chromates, chromate coatings, and chromate-free coatings. Corrosion 59(5), 379–400 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    K.D. Ralston et al., Corrosion inhibition of aluminum alloy 2024-T3 by aqueous vanadium species. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155(7), C350–C359 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A.N. Salak et al., Anion exchange in Zn-Al layered double hydroxides: In situ X-ray diffraction study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 495(1–3), 73–76 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M.L. Zheludkevich et al., Active protection coatings with layered double hydroxide nanocontainers of corrosion inhibitor. Corros. Sci. 52(2), 602–611 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    S.K. Poznyak et al., Novel Inorganic Host Layered Double Hydroxides Intercalated with Guest Organic Inhibitors for Anticorrosion Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1(10), 2353–2362 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    G. McAdam et al., Fiber optic sensors for detection of corrosion within aircraft. Struct. Health Monit. 4(1), 47–56 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    S.K. Sahoo, V. Labhasetwar, Nanotech approaches to delivery and imaging drug. Drug Discov. Today 8(24), 1112–1120 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    M. Nishikawa et al., Hepatocyte-targeted in vivo gene expression by intravenous injection of plasmid DNA complexed with synthetic multi-functional gene delivery system. Gene Ther. 7(7), 548–555 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    I. Roy et al., Calcium phosphate nanoparticles as novel non-viral vectors for targeted gene delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 250(1), 25–33 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    S.R. Taylor, B.D. Chambers, Identification and characterization of nonchromate corrosion inhibitor synergies using high-throughput methods. Corrosion 64(3), 255–270 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    S.R. Taylor, B.D. Chambers, The discovery of non-chromate corrosion inhibitors for aerospace alloys using high-throughput screening methods. Corros. Rev. 25(5–6), 571–590 (2007)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    B.D. Chambers, S.R. Taylor, M.W. Kendig, Rapid discovery of corrosion inhibitors and synergistic combinations using high-throughput screening methods. Corrosion 61(5), 480–489 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    S.J. Garcia et al., The influence of pH on corrosion inhibitor selection for 2024-T3 aluminium alloy assessed by high-throughput multielectrode and potentiodynamic testing. Electrochim. Acta 55(7), 2457–2465 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    B.F. Gibbs et al., Encapsulation in the food industry: a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 50(3), 213–224 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. E. Hughes
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • J. M. C. Mol
    • 3
  • M. L. Zheludkevich
    • 4
  • R. G. Buchheit
    • 5
  1. 1.Mineral ResourcesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Frontier MaterialsDeakin UniversityWaurn PondsAustralia
  3. 3.Mechanical, Maritime and Materials EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Magnesium Innovation CentreInstitute of Materials ResearchGeesthachtGermany
  5. 5.Materials Science EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options