Skip to main content

Intermittent Catheterization (IC)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Neurourology

Abstract

Catheter drainage of the lower urinary tract in patients with neurogenic bladder seeks to maintain low bladder pressures that protect the kidneys, minimize urinary tract infections (UTIs), and achieve dryness to prevent decubitus ulcers and for social reasons. In mild cases of neurogenic voiding impairment, timed voiding and assistive maneuvers can achieve these goals and should always be attempted prior to instituting catheterization. External devices, in the form of condom catheters, may be preferable for men, when low pressure incontinence due to poor outlet resistance is the dominant issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jamil F. Towards a catheter free status in neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a review of bladder management options in spinal cord injury (SCI). Spinal Cord. 2001;39:355–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamin E, Newman DK. Clean intermittent catheterization revisited. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48:931–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunter KF, Bharmal A, Moore KN. Long-term bladder drainage: suprapubic catheter versus other methods: a scoping review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:944–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Katsumi HK, Kalisvaart JF, Ronningen LD, Hovey RM. Urethral versus suprapubic catheter: choosing the best bladder management for male spinal cord injury patients with indwelling catheters. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:325–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jamison J, Maguire S, McCann J. Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD004375.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chao R, Clowers D, Mayo ME. Fate of upper urinary tracts in patients with indwelling catheters after spinal cord injury. Urology. 1993;42:259–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol. 1972;107:458–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guttmann L. Discussion of the treatment and prognosis of traumatic parapalegia. Proc R Soc Med. 1947;40:219–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Niel-Weise BS, van den Broek PJ, da Silva EM, Silva LA. Urinary catheter policies for long-term bladder drainage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD004201.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drake MJ, Apostolidis A, Cocci A, Emmanuel A, Gajewski JB, Harrison SC, et al. Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: clinical management recommendations of the Neurologic Incontinence Committee of the Fifth International Consultation on Incontinence 2013. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:657–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Snow-Lisy DC, Yerkes EB, Cheng EY. Update on urological management of spina bifida from prenatal diagnosis to adulthood. J Urol. 2015;194:288–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lapides J. Mechanisms of urinary tract infection. Urology. 1979;14:217–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes FM Jr, Hill HM, Wood CM, Edmondson AT, Dumas A, Foo WC, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome mediates inflammation produced by bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. 2016;195:1598–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siddiq DM, Darouiche RO. New strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9:305–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Turi MH, Hanif S, Fasih Q, Shaikh MA. Proportion of complications in patients practicing clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) vs indwelling catheter. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56:401–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Esclarin De Ruz A, Garcia Leoni E, Herruzo Cabrera R. Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Urol. 2000;164:1285–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2000;163:768–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van den Brand IC, Castelein RM. Total joint arthroplasty and incidence of postoperative bacteriuria with an indwelling catheter or intermittent catheterization with one-dose antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplast. 2001;16:850–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hakvoort RA, Thijs SD, Bouwmeester FW, Broekman AM, Ruhe IM, Vernooij MM, et al. Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG. 2011;118:1055–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schurch B, Tawadros C, Carda S. Dysfunction of lower urinary tract in patients with spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;130:247–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobs SC, Kaufman JM. Complications of permanent bladder catheter drainage in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol. 1978;119:740–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hackler RH. Long-term suprapubic cystostomy drainage in spinal cord injury patients. Br J Urol. 1982;54:120–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sekar P, Wallace DD, Waites KB, DeVivo MJ, Lloyd LK, Stover SL, et al. Comparison of long-term renal function after spinal cord injury using different urinary management methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:992–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dewire DM, Owens RS, Anderson GA, Gottlieb MS, Lepor H. A comparison of the urological complications associated with long-term management of quadriplegics with and without chronic indwelling urinary catheters. J Urol. 1992;147:1069–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McGuire EJ, Savastano JA. Urodynamic findings and clinical status following vesical denervation procedures for control of incontinence. J Urol. 1984;132:87–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Z, Liao L. Risk factors predicting upper urinary tract deterioration in patients with spinal cord injury: a prospective study. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:468–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jamil F, Williamson M, Ahmed YS, Harrison SC. Natural-fill urodynamics in chronically catheterized patients with spinal-cord injury. BJU Int. 1999;83:396–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitsui T, Minami K, Furuno T, Morita H, Koyanagi T. Is suprapubic cystostomy an optimal urinary management in high quadriplegics?. A comparative study of suprapubic cystostomy and clean intermittent catheterization. Eur Urol. 2000;38:434–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bothig R, Hirschfeld S, Thietje R. Quality of life and urological morbidity in tetraplegics with artificial ventilation managed with suprapubic or intermittent catheterisation. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:247–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaufman JM, Fam B, Jacobs SC, Gabilondo F, Yalla S, Kane JP, et al. Bladder cancer and squamous metaplasia in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol. 1977;118:967–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Locke JR, Hill DE, Walzer Y. Incidence of squamous cell carcinoma in patients with long-term catheter drainage. J Urol. 1985;133:1034–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Delnay KM, Stonehill WH, Goldman H, Jukkola AF, Dmochowski RR. Bladder histological changes associated with chronic indwelling urinary catheter. J Urol. 1999;161:1106–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stonehill WH, Dmochowski RR, Patterson AL, Cox CE. Risk factors for bladder tumors in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol. 1996;155:1248–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Adriaansen JJ, van Asbeck FW, Tepper M, Faber WX, Visser-Meily JM, de Kort LM, et al. Bladder-emptying methods, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and impact on quality of life in people with long-term spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oh SJ, Ku JH, Jeon HG, Shin HI, Paik NJ, Yoo T. Health-related quality of life of patients using clean intermittent catheterization for neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury. Urology. 2005;65:306–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chai T, Chung AK, Belville WD, Faerber GJ. Compliance and complications of clean intermittent catheterization in the spinal-cord injured patient. Paraplegia. 1995;33:161–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Husmann DA. Long-term complications following bladder augmentations in patients with spina bifida: bladder calculi, perforation of the augmented bladder and upper tract deterioration. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:3–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, Colgan R, Geerlings SE, Rice JC, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:625–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, Kuntz G, Pegues DA, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory C. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:319–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wald H, Richard A, Dickson VV, Capezuti E. Chief nursing officers’ perspectives on Medicare’s hospital-acquired conditions non-payment policy: implications for policy design and implementation. Implement Sci. 2012;7:78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D, Del Popolo G, Gross T, Hamid R, et al. Summary of European association of urology (EAU) guidelines on neuro-urology. Eur Urol. 2016;69:324–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vahr S, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Eikenboom J, Geng V, Holyrod S, Lester M, et al. Catheterisation urethral intermittent in adults. 2013. http://patients.uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Catheterisation-Urethral-Intermittent-in-adults-Lr_DEF.pdf.

  43. Prieto J, Murphy CL, Moore KN, Fader M. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD006008.

    Google Scholar 

  44. King RB, Carlson CE, Mervine J, Wu Y, Yarkony GM. Clean and sterile intermittent catheterization methods in hospitalized patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:798–802.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Duffy LM, Cleary J, Ahern S, Kuskowski MA, West M, Wheeler L, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization: safe, cost-effective bladder management for male residents of VA nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:865–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moore KN, Burt J, Voaklander DC. Intermittent catheterization in the rehabilitation setting: a comparison of clean and sterile technique. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:461–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Charbonneau-Smith R. No-touch catheterization and infection rates in a select spinal cord injured population. Rehabil Nurs. 1993;18:296–9, 305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chitale S, Hirani M, Swift L, Ho E. Prospective randomized crossover trial of lubricant gel against an anaesthetic gel for outpatient cystoscopy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42:164–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Palit V, Ashurst HN, Biyani CS, Elmasray Y, Puri R, Shah T. Is using lignocaine gel prior to flexible cystoscopy justified? A randomized prospective study. Urol Int. 2003;71:389–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ho KJ, Thompson TJ, O’Brien A, Young MR, McCleane G. Lignocaine gel: does it cause urethral pain rather than prevent it? Eur Urol. 2003;43:194–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pachler J, Frimodt-Moller C. A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization. BJU Int. 1999;83:767–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kiddoo D, Sawatzky B, Bascu CD, Dharamsi N, Afshar K, Moore KN. Randomized crossover trial of single use hydrophilic coated vs multiple use polyvinylchloride catheters for intermittent catheterization to determine incidence of urinary infection. J Urol. 2015;194:174–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Schlager TA, Clark M, Anderson S. Effect of a single-use sterile catheter for each void on the frequency of bacteriuria in children with neurogenic bladder on intermittent catheterization for bladder emptying. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, Mevorach RA. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter. J Urol. 1996;156:2041–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Sarica S, Akkoc Y, Karapolat H, Aktug H. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46:473–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. De Ridder DJ, Everaert K, Fernandez LG, Valero JV, Duran AB, Abrisqueta ML, et al. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial. Eur Urol. 2005;48:991–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cardenas DD, Moore KN, Dannels-McClure A, Scelza WM, Graves DE, Brooks M, et al. Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infections in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. PM R. 2011;3:408–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Scivoletto G, Virgili G, Dolci S, Porena M. Intermittent catheterization with a prelubricated catheter in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomized crossover study. J Urol. 2001;166:130–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, Hayter E, Spinks J, Pellowe C. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:e8639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Goessaert AS, Antoons S, Van Den Driessche M, Tourchi A, Pieters R, Everaert K. No-touch intermittent catheterization: caregiver point of view on sterility errors, duration, comfort and costs. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:2000–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kelly KJ, Walsh-Kelly CM. Latex allergy: a patient and health care system emergency. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:723–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Garabrant DH, Schweitzer S. Epidemiology of latex sensitization and allergies in health care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110(Suppl 2):S82–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Monasterio EA, Barber DB, Rogers SJ, Able AC, Fredrickson MD. Latex allergy in adults with spinal cord injury: a pilot investigation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2000;23:6–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Beaudouin E, Prestat F, Schmitt M, Kanny G, Laxenaire MC, Moneret-Vautrin DA. High risk of sensitization to latex in children with spina bifida. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1994;4:90–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Nacey JN, Delahunt B, Tulloch AG. The assessment of catheter-induced urethritis using an experimental dog model. J Urol. 1985;134:623–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wood CE, Jokinen MP, Johnson CL, Olson GR, Hester S, George M, et al. Comparative time course profiles of phthalate stereoisomers in mice. Toxicol Sci. 2014;139:21–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hall AG. Nurses: taking precautionary action on a pediatric environmental exposure: DEHP. Pediatr Nurs. 2006;32:91–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Hoenich NA, Levin R, Pearce C. Clinical waste generation from renal units: implications and solutions. Semin Dial. 2005;18:396–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lawrence EL, Turner IG. Materials for urinary catheters: a review of their history and development in the UK. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27:443–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Dworniczek E, Kuzko K, Mroz E, Wojciech L, Adamski R, Sobieszczanska B, et al. Virulence factors and in vitro adherence of enterococcus strains to urinary catheters. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48:671–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Kovindha A, Mai WN, Madersbacher H. Reused silicone catheter for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC): is it safe for spinal cord-injured (SCI) men? Spinal Cord. 2004;42:638–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Todd Purves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Purves, J.T., Lloyd, J.C. (2019). Intermittent Catheterization (IC). In: Liao, L., Madersbacher, H. (eds) Neurourology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7509-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7509-0_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7507-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7509-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics