Skip to main content
Book cover

Neurourology pp 261–265Cite as

External Appliances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This article focuses on the Male External Catheter (MEC), on assessment, products, techniques and care. A MEC is indicated in male patient if other curative treatment options have either failed or are deemed unsuitable, perhaps on account of a patient being unfit for any other intervention or are requested by the patient. The usual scenarios are urinary incontinence without significant post-void residual urine, overactive bladder with urge UI and significant post-void residual urine in patients that are incapable or unwilling to perform IC or other treatment options, but without other complications of chronic urinary retention. Absolute and relative contraindications are listed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Doherty W. Urinary sheaths: assessment, prescription and evaluation. Br J Community Nurs. 2001;6(2):80–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pomfret I. Back to basics: urinary sheaths. J Community Nurs. 2003;17:22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brodie A. A guide to the management of one-piece urinary sheaths. Nurs Times. 2006;102(9):49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lam T, Omar M, Fisher E, Gillies K, MacLennan S. Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD004013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cottenden A, Bliss D, Buckley B, et al., Management using continence products. In: ICUD Comm 20; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ouslander J, Greengold B, Chen S. External catheter use and urinary tract infections among incontinent male nursing home patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987;35(12):1063–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Byers P, Lyder C, McCray G, et al. Efficacy of condom catheters in controlling incontinence odor. Appl Nurs Res Elsevier. 1992;5:186–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Potter J. Male urinary incontinence—could penile sheaths be the answer? J Community Nurs. 2007;21:40–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pascoe G. Transfix: a new range of all-silicone male incontinence sheaths. Br J Community Nurs. 2001;6(6):313–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson J. Continence: sizing and fitting a penile sheath. Br J Community Nurs. 2006;11:420–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pratt R, Pellowe C, Wilson J, Loveday H, Harper P, Jones S, McDougall C, Wilcox M. epic2: National Evidence-Based Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections in NHS Hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65(Suppl 1):1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bath J, Fader M, Petterson L. Urinary sheaths and bags making an informed choice. Prim Health Care. 1999;9(7):17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Golji H. Complications of external condom drainage. Paraplegia. 1981;19(3):189–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saint S, Kaufman S, Rogers M, et al. Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1055–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Banerji J, Shah S, Kekre N. Fibroepithelial polyp of the prepuce: a rare complication of long-term condom. Indian J Urol. 2008;24:263–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan H, Treacy A, Yousef G, Stewart R. Giant fibroepithelial polyp of the glans penis not associated with condom-catheter use: a case report and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7(9–10):E621–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Özkan H, İrkoren S, Sivrioğlu N. Penile strangulation and necrosis due to condom catheter. Int Wound J. 2015;12(3):248–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bycroft J, Hamid R, Shah P. Penile erosion in spinal cord injury–an important lesson. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(11):643–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Palmero Martí J, Bonillo García M, Pacheco Bru J, Alapont Alacreu J, García Reboll L, Jiménez Cruz J. Necrosis of the skin of the penis as a complication of the use of a urine collector. Actas Urol Esp. 2003;27(2):155–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawoosa N. Isolated gangrene of the penis in a paraplegic patient secondary to a condom catheter. Indian J Surg. 2011;73(4):304–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Macaulay M, Broadbridge J, Gage H, Williams P, Birch B, Moore K, Cottenden A, Fader M. A trial of devices for urinary incontinence after treatment for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2015;116(3):432–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fader M. Review of current technologies for urinary incontinence: strengths and limitations. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2003;217:233–41.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blok B, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D et al. EAU guidelines on neuro-urology. In: European Association of Urology; 2015. p. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dora Mair .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Geng, V., Cobussen-Boekhorst, H., Lurvink, H., Pearce, I., Vahr, S., Mair, D. (2019). External Appliances. In: Liao, L., Madersbacher, H. (eds) Neurourology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7509-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7509-0_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7507-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7509-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics