Abstract
According to ICI 2017 imaging of the upper urinary tract upper urinary tract (UUT) is indicated in cases of NLUTD and urinary incontinence with high risk of renal damage (due to high storage and/or voiding detrusor pressure, e.g., myelodysplasia, spinal cord injury) [1]. There is however no general consensus how frequently this evaluation has been indicated and what test included. European Association of Urology guidelines (EAU) [2] and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines [3] has similar although slightly different recommendations. Currently, the Canadian Urological Association (CUA) and the American Urological Association (AUA) lack guidelines for management of neurogenic bladder. This chapter describes imaging techniques in the evaluation of the patients with NLUTD.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A. 6th International Consultation on Incontinence (2017) Tokyo, September 2016, incontinence, 6th Edition.
Pannek J, Blok B, Castro-Diaz D, Del Popolo G, Kramer G, Radziszewski P, Reitz A, Stöhrer M, Wyndaele JJ. Guidelines on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. European Association of Urology; 2013.
Urinary incontinence in neurological disease: management of lower urinary tract dysfunction in neurological disease. 2012. NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg148/chapter/1-guidance. Accessed 3 Aug 2017.
Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA. Campbell-Walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011.
Calenoff L, Neiman HL, Kaplan PE, Nannninga JB, Brandt TD, Hamilton BB. Urosonography in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol. 1982;128:1234–7.
Abrams P, Agarwal M, Drake M. A proposed guideline for the urological management of patients with spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 2008;101:989–94.
Cameron AP, Rodriguez GM, Schomer KG. Systematic review of urological follow-up after spinal cord injury. J Urol. 2012;187:391–7.
Razden S, Leboeuf L, Meinback DS. Current practice patterns in the urologic surveillance and management of patients with spinal cord injury. Urol. 2003;61:893–6.
Averbeck MA, Madersbacher H. Follow-up of the neuro-urological patient: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2015;115:39–46.
Guzelkucuk U, Demir Y, Kesikburun S. Ultrasound findings of the urinary tract in patients with spinal cord injury: a study of 1005 cases. Spinal Cord. 2015;53:139–44.
Akkoc Y, Cinar Y, Kismali R. Should complete and incomplete spinal cord injury patients receive the same attention in urodynamic evaluations and ultrasonography examinations of the upper urinary tract? Int J Rehabil Res. 2012;35:178–80.
Elmelund M, Oturai PS, Toso B. Forty-five year follow-up on the renal function after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:445–51.
Zhang Z, Liao L. Risk factors predicting upper urinary tract deterioration in patients with spinal cord injury: a prospective study. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:468–71.
Tsai S, Ting H, Ho C. Use of sonography and radioisotope renography to diagnose hydronephrosis in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:103–6.
Bih L, Tsai S, Tung L. Sonographic diagnosis of hydronephrosis in patients with spinal cord injury: influence of bladder fullness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1537–9.
Vaidyanathan S, Hughes PS, Soni BM. A comparative stud of ultrasound examination of urinary tract performed on spinal cord injury patients with no urinary symptoms and spinal cord injury patients with symptoms related to urinary tract: do findings of ultrasound examination lead to changes in clinical management? Sci World J. 2006;30:2450–9.
Tseng F, Bih R, Tsai S. Application of renal Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of obstructive uropathy in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1509–12.
Alpajaro SIR, Bolong DT. The incidence and implications of hydronephrosis at initial presentation of patients with neurogenic bladder. Eur Urol Suppl. 2015;14:e498. (abstract)
Capitanucci ML, Iacobelli BD, Siveri M. Long-term urological follow-up of occult spinal dysraphism in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1996;6:25–6.
Ma Y, Li B, Wang L. The predictive factors of hydronephrosis in patients with spina bifida: reports from China. In Urol Nephrol. 2013;45:687–93.
Veenboer PW, Hobbelink MGG, Ruud Bosch JLH. Diagnostic accuracy of Tc-99m DMSA scintigraphy and renal ultrasonography for detecting renal scarring and relative function in patients with spinal dysraphism. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:513–8.
Lemack GE, Hawker K, Frohman E. Incidence of upper tract abnormalities in patients with neurovesical dysfunction secondary to multiple sclerosis: analysis of risk factors at initial urologic evaluation. Urology. 2005;65:854–7.
Christman MS, Kalmus A, Casale P. Morbidity and efficacy of ureteroscopic stone treatment in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol. 2013;190:1479–83.
Ganesan V, Chen WM, Jain R. Multiple sclerosis and nephrolithiasis: a matched-case comparative study. BJU Int. 2017;119:919–25.
Kanno T, Kubota M, Funada S. The utility of the kidney-ureters-bladder radiograph as the sole imaging modality and its combination with ultrasonography for the detection of renal stones. Urology. 2017;104:40–4.
Tins B, Teo HG, Popuri R. Follow-up imaging of the urinary tract in spinal injury patients: is a KUB necessary with every ultrasound? Spinal Cord. 2005;43:219–22.
Bih L, Ho C, Tsai S. Bladder shape impact on the accuracy of ultrasonic estimation of bladder volume. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1553–6.
Patel U. Imaging modalities used for assessment of the bladder. In: Patel U, editor. Imaging and urodynamics of the lower urinary tract. London: Springer; 2010. p. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-836-0_2.
Choe JH, Lee JY, Lee K. Accuracy and precision of a new portable ultrasound scanner, the BME-150A, in residual urine volume measurement: a comparison with the BladderScan BVI 3000. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(6):641–4.
Park YH, Ku JH, Oh S. Accuracy of post-void residual urine volume measurement using a portable ultrasound bladder scanner with real-time pre-scan imaging. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:335–8.
Housami F, Drake M, Abrams P. The use of ultrasound-estimated bladder weight in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction and detrusor overactivity in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(1):105–9.
Oelke M. International consultation on incontinence-research society (ICI-RS) report on non-invasive urodynamics: the need of standardization of ultrasound bladder and detrusor wall thickness measurements to quantify bladder wall hypertrophy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:634–9.
Panicker JN, Fowler CJ, Kessler TM. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in the neurological patient: clinical assessment and management. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:720–32.
Sturm RM, Cheng EY. Bladder wall thickness in the assessment of neurogenic bladder: a translational discussion of current clinical applications. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:32.
Silva JAF, de Castro Diniz Gonsalves M, de Melo RT. Association between the bladder wall thickness and urodynamic findings in patients with spinal cord injury. World J Urol. 2015;33:131–5.
Tanaka H, Matsuka M, Moriya K. Ultrasonographic measurement of bladder wall thickness as a risk factor for upper urinary tract deterioration in children with myelodysplasia. J Urol. 2008;180:312–6.
Kojima M, Inui E, Ochiai A. Possible use of ultrasonically-estimated bladder weight in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 1996;15:641–9.
Bayat M, Kumar V, Denis M. Correlation of ultrasound bladder vibrometry assessment of bladder compliance with urodynamic study results. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179598.
Sturm RM, Yerkes EB, Nicholas JL. Ultrasound shear wave elastography: a novel method to evaluate bladder pressure. J Urol. 2017;198:422–9.
Bright E, Oelke M, Tubaro A, Abrams P. Ultrasound estimated bladder weight and measurement of bladder wall thickness—useful noninvasive methods for assessing the lower urinary tract? J Urol. 2010;184(5):1847–54.
Wiseman OJ, Swinn MJ, Brady CM, Fowler CJ. Maximum urethral closure pressure and sphincter volume in women in retention. J Urol. 2002;167:367–71.
Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ. Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2005;235(3):756–73.
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim K-P, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2078–86.
https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emittingproducts/radiationemittingproductsandprocedures/medicalimaging/medicalx-rays/ucm115317.htm. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/CT/risks.html. Accessed July 2017.
Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4(5):272–84.
Berrington de González A, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071–7.
Demb J, Chu P, Nelson T, Hall D, Seibert A, Lamba R, Boone J, Krishnam M, Cagnon C, Bostani M, Gould R, Miglioretti D, Smith-Bindman R. Optimizing radiation doses for computed tomography across institutions dose auditing and best practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(6):810–7.
Stenzl A, Kolle D, Eder R, Stoger A, Frank R, Bartsch G. Virtual reality of the lower urinary tract in women. Int Urogynecol J. 1999;10:248–53.
Stenzl A, Frank R, Eder R, et al. 3-Dimentional computerized tomography and virtual reality endoscopy of the reconstructed lower urinary tract. J Urol. 1998;159(3):741–6.
Crivellaro S, Mami E, Wald C, et al. Correlation between urodynamic function and 3D cat scan anatomy in neobladders: does it exist? Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(3):236–40.
Arslan H, Ceylan K, Harman M, Yilmaz Y, Temizoz O, Can S. Virtual computed tomography cystoscopy in bladder pathologies. Int Braz J Urol. 2006;32(2):147–54.
Perazella MA. Gadolinium-contrast toxicity in patients with kidney disease: nephrotoxicity and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Curr Drug Saf. 2008;3(1):67–75.
Khawaja AZ, Cassidy DB, Al Shakarchi J, McGrogan DG, Inston NG, Jones RG. Revisiting the risks of MRI with gadolinium based contrast agents-review of literature and guidelines. Insights Imaging. 2015;6(5):553–8.
Margulies RU, Hsu Y, Kearney R, Stein T, Umek WH, DeLancey JO. Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in magnetic resonance images. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):1064–9.
Shipstone DP, Thomas DG, Darwent G, Morcos SK. Magnetic resonance urography in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction and spinal dysraphism. BJU Int. 2002;89:658–64.
Roy C, Saussine C, Guth S, et al. MR urography in the evaluation of urinary tract obstruction. Abdom Imaging. 1998;23:27–34.
Battal B, Kocaoglu M, Akgun V, Aydur E, Dayanc M, Ilica T. Feasibility of MR urography in patients with urinary diversion. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2011;55:542–50.
Gousse AE, Barbaric ZL, Safir MH, Madjar S, Marumoto AK, Raz S. Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis. J Urol. 2000;164:1606.
Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL, Gousse AE, Raz S. Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology. 1999;54:454.
Hocaoglu Y, Roosen A, Herrmann K, Tritschler S, Stief C, Bauer RM. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): anatomical changes during physiological voiding in men. BJU Int. 2011;109:234–9.
Borghesi G, Simonetti R, Goldman SM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging urodynamics. Technique development and preliminary results. Int Braz Urol. 2006;32:336–41.
Shy M, Fung S, Boone TB, Karmonik C, Fletcher SG, Khavar R. Functional magnetic resonance imaging during urodynamic testing identifies brain structures initiating micturition. J Urol. 2014;192:1149–54.
Khavari R, Karmonik C, Shy M, Fletcher S, Boone T. Functional magnetic resonance imaging with concurrent urodynamic testing identifies brain structures involved in micturition cycle in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Urol. 2017;197:438–44.
Zempleni M-Z, Michels L, Mehnert U, Schurch B, Kollias S. Cortical substrate of bladder control in SCI and the effect of peripheral pudendal stimulation. NeuroImage. 2010;49:2983–94.
Sakakibara R, Uchida Y, Ishii K, Kazui H, Hashimoto M, Ishikawa M, Yuasa T, Kishi M, Ogawa E, Tateno F, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto T, Yamanishi T, Terada H, the members of SINPHONI (Study of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus On Neurological Improvement). Correlation of right frontal hypoperfusion and urinary dysfunction in iNPH: a SPECT study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:50–5.
Kavia RB, DasGupta R, Critchley HD, et al. An fMRI study of the effect of sacral neuromodulation on brain responses in women with Fowler’s syndrome. BJU Int. 2010;105:366–72.
DasGupta R, Critchley HD, Dolan RJ, et al. Changes in brain activity following sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention. J Urol. 2015;174:2268–72.
Griffiths D, Fowler CJ. Brain imaging in Fowler’s syndrome. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2010;5:114–8.
Kitta T, Kakizaki H, Furuno T, Moriya K, Tanaka H, Shiga T, Tamaki N, Yabe I, Sasaki H, Nonomura K. Brain activation during detrusor overactivity in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a positron emission tomography study. J Urol. 2006;175:994–8.
Herzog J, Weiss PH, Assmus A, Wefer B, Seif C, Braun PM, Pinsker MO, Herzog H, Volkmann J, Deuschl G, Fink GR. Improved sensory gating of urinary bladder afferents in Parkinson’s disease following subthalamic stimulation. Brain. 2008;131:132–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gajewski, J.B., Cox, A.R. (2019). Imaging Techniques in the Evaluation of the Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (NLUTD). In: Liao, L., Madersbacher, H. (eds) Neurourology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7509-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7509-0_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7507-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7509-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)