Abstract
The hazards and vulnerability concepts are introduced after a brief review of the definition of risk. Hazards are essentially associated with any natural phenomenon investigated, while vulnerability is primarily a socioeconomic parameter influenced by other drivers of change such as demography. The risk concept derives from these two parameters. Given that there is no such thing as a zero risk situation, it is essential to introduce the idea of an acceptable level of risk which must be determined through a participatory process set in motion by society. Knowledge regarding these two risk components is dependent on the methods used to assess them and associated levels of uncertainty. The impact of climate change on hazards is hard to quantify because, under a constant climate, it is generally an order of magnitude below the natural existing uncertainty. Conversely, vulnerability is not well understood and few rigorous methods are available to quantify this factor. Clarifying hazards thus may seem to enhance the risk assessment but this is illusory since the less understood vulnerability factor is overlooked, which may lead to too much attention being focused on the hazards factor to the detriment of vulnerability management. This may also apply to other climate risks such as drought, although flooding risk is better understood. These considerations may be useful for the agricultural community which, besides its production function, could offer society other services of territorial scope, encompassing different areas, while in return benefitting from support measures that would make the risks more acceptable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The 1992 historic flood of the Ouvèze River at Vaison-la-Romaine (France) is edifying in this respect—it was not possible to reduce the assessment range (found to be between 800 and 1200 m3/s) even after a year of research (Chastan et al. 1993; Gilard and Mesnil 1994). Similarly, inclusion of a single especially dry year in the 1986 Niger River flow record prompted a review of all probabilistic flood frequency estimates for this large river.
References
Alliaud D, De Saint-Seine J (CNR), Lang M, Sauquet E, Renard B(Irstea) (2013) Étude du risque d’inondation d’un site industriel par des crues extrêmes: de l’évaluation des valeurs extrêmes aux incertitudes hydrologiques et hydrauliques, 207e session du comité scientifique et technique de la Société hydrotechnique de France, 13–14 novembre 2013
Chastan B, Gilard O, Lavabre J (1993) Les difficultés d’estimation rapide des débits observés en crue: exemple de la crue de l’Ouvèze du 22 septembre 1992. Revue de géographie de Lyon 68(2):153–158
Galéa G, Javelle P, Chaput N (2000) Un modèle débit-durée-fréquence pour caractériser le régime d’étiage d’un bassin versant. Revue des sciences de l’eau-Journal of Water Science 13(4):421–440, <http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/705401ar>
Gilard O (1998a) Guide pratique de la méthode Inondabilité, coll. Étude Interagences de l’eau, Agence de l’eau, ministère de l’Environnement
Gilard O., 1998b. Guide technique de la méthode Inondabilité, Cemagref Éditions
Gilard O, Mesnil JJ (1994) Le risque d’inondation: analyse de la crue de Vaison-la-Romaine, quelques réflexions sur le risque d’inondation. Bulletin de l’AIGREF, 24, 12 p
Goutx D (2012) Rôle des individus dans la prévention des risques d’inondation et la gestion de crise. In: 23 es Journées scientifiques de l’environnement, Risques environnementaux: détecter, comprendre, s’adapter, Créteil, France
Javelle P, Grésillon J-M, Galéa G (1999) Modélisation des courbes débit-durée-fréquence en crues et invariance d’échelle. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences – Series IIA – Earth and Planetary. Science 329(1):39–44
Mar AL, Gineste P, Hamatan M, Mahe G (2003) Modélisation débit-durée-fréquence appliquée à des bassins versants de grande taille du Burkina Faso. Sud Sciences et technologie, (11)
Redaud JL, Noilhan J, Gillet M, Huc M, Begni G (2002) Changement climatique et impact sur le régime des eaux en France, Mission interministérielle de l’effet de serre. Ministère de l’Écologie et du Développement durable, Paris, France
Renard B, Lang M, Bois P, Dupeyrat A, Mestre O, Niel H, Gailhard J, Laurent C, Neppel L, Sauquet E (2006) Évolution des extrêmes hydrométriques en France à partir de données observées. La houille blanche 6:48–54
Sauquet S, Vidal JP, Perrin C, Bourgin PY, Chauveau M, Chazot S, Rouchy N (2012) Climate and hydrological uncertainties in projections of flood and low-flows in France. Geophysical Research Abstracts (EGU 2012), Vienna, Austria, avril 2012
Veyret Y, Reghezza M (2006) Vulnérabilité et risques, l’approche récente de la vulnérabilité. Responsabilité et environnement, (43), juillet 2006
Vinet F (2010) Le risque inondation: diagnostic et gestion, Lavoisier, Tec & Doc, Série Innovation, sciences du risque et du danger, 328 p
Weiss K, Girandola F, Colbeau-Justin L (2011) Les comportements de protection face au risque naturel: de la résistance à l’engagement. Pratiques psychologiques 17(3):251–262
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Éditions Quæ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilard, O. (2016). Hazards, Vulnerability and Risk. In: Torquebiau, E. (eds) Climate Change and Agriculture Worldwide. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7462-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7462-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7460-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7462-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)